lawblob said:
There is no possibility of her looking good. Katie Couric was not asking difficult questions. Even if she is not a policy wonk, she should at least coherently be able to regurgitate Republican talking points. She cant even do that. Under the spotlight of a 90 minute freewheeling debate where she has to think on her toes to on-the-spot questions.... she will look dumb as fuck.
Well, the situation is volatile. Some of the Chicken Littles out there are terrified that as long as she puts up some sort of mediocre performance in the debate, then she will have exceeded expectations and will consequently win the debate just because she didn't embarrass herself.
There might be a hint of validity to that. If the expectations are that she's going to utterly humiliate herself and be off the ticket on Friday (maybe not that soon, but you know where I'm going with it), this could work. But it can only succeed if you think she still has some goodwill left out there, and independants watch her after the debate and buy into the "media has been overly harsh towards her" narrative. She would have to be elevated to some heroic figure her persevered in the face of being dealt a really bad hand.
And with the polls showing what they are, I don't think this is the case. The Palin hype has faded. We're no longer in a position where we'll consider anything short of her bursting into tears and running off the stage a disaster. Her limited and dubious interviews have caused the public at large to question her qualifications. Yeah, she might do better than expected, but I don't think that's going to be good enough to change the tide for the McCain campaign. However, I don't think it's entirely outside the realm of possibility that she might put up a servicable performance.