That cat math, now I know where Judd get's it. This isn't possible when we dogs had the majority of the players. We actually had more, but were able to make up for our shitty terrible teammates.
Sorry, could you explain in more detail what you're saying? More of what, good players or bad players? More ___ players or more percent of ___ players?
I'm saying you guys had more players but the percentage of good-bad was roughly the same, at least the players that made it into a cat vs. dog match. The 51/49 result shows this, it's as close as it can be with one side coming out on top.
By the time I got to Cat King I had 30.0 rating. Most of the dog players were terrible that I met... but then if you read here on GAF some dog players had the same experience in their favor. I hope no one is letting anecdotal evidence affect your opinion. Some people had good runs, some bad, but at the end the result was 51/49, as even as possible.