I might be starting some shit but which game is better? MH looks better, but which has better gameplay?
I might be starting some shit but which game is better? MH looks better, but which has better gameplay?
They're completely different. There's no way to judge this unless you see some gameplay videos on the... you know... internet, like everyone with these type of questions should do in the first place.
2010 with MHP3rd
My local Targets have maybe 8 games for the system on their shelves, and they're actually with the Wii games in one of the stores.Pretty much. Has a system ever lost almost all it's shelf space only to gain some of it back? The second the first major US retailer actually drops it, there will be no going back, although some individual Target's I believe are already either not carrying it or barely pretending it exists.
If they released a new exclusive mainline numbered entry in the MH franchise for the dreamcast it would bring the platform back from the dead in japan, and those numbers only go higher and higher on any handheld platform.
The fanbase would absolutely move platforms for an exclusive MH game , and the vita wouldn't even need the whole fanbase to move to change its current fate. The chances of that actually happening for the vita are an entirely different story but to say that it wouldn't "save" the vita if it did by chance happen is just crazy to me.
Anyway, thanks for the action/rpg breakdown, Sera.
There is nothing to imply how MH would sell on Vita indeed, but that is natural because MH doesnt excist on the Vita. Looking at other titles is not much of an indicator for how MH would sell on Vita. The last game that capped 200k was either Persona 4 Golden or Miku F, but these titles are completely different games and series. Monster Hunter is in a completely different league than anything that excist on the Vita, so there is no indication to look for.Yea it'll sell more but that doesn't mean it'll sell massively more. It's not like people that own a vita will be more inclined to buy Monster by such a significant degree in comparison to any of the other "big" games it has. There's nothing to imply they're holding out. The system isn't exactly swimming in big games.
No problem. I'm actually a bit curious as to which one you'll go with.
If MH4 had never been made for 3DS and come out on Vita instead yes the platform would have a completely different fate. We're talking about the MH fanbase moving over from the 3DS years after MH4 has already come out for a game on a platform that will likely be almost completely dead if not dead and gone by the time this 3 years is up
There is nothing to imply how MH would sell on Vita indeed, but that is natural, because MH doesnt excist on the Vita. Looking at other titles is not much of an indicator for how MH would sell on Vita. The last game that capped 200k was either Persona 4 Golden or Miku F, but these titles are completely different games and series.
If that's true, and it's only 3 years, then PSVita will for sure dominate the market on japan by the end of the generation.
I mean, it's monster hunter with HD graphics, while the 3DS iterations are even below what we saw on PSP in that regard.
Unless Nintendo paid big money, this rumor isn't true. Capcom would never do this. Think about it. Almost every "major" game, they release on every device. Capcom isn't one to limit their profits.
If it is true (for whatever reason) bad news for Sony though.
MH3U's multiplayer is running on dedicated servers owned by Nintendo. Think about it.
If Sony wants to save Vita there will be a Monster Hunter Portable released for it. Capcom and Nintendo exclusive games don't exactly have a history of staying exclusive, even when Nintendo makes a big fuss about them being exclusive. Resident Evil is the poster boy of this, with every entry they've made except RE0 and REmake being ported to other non-Nintendo platforms.
If that's true, and it's only 3 years, then PSVita will for sure dominate the market on japan by the end of the generation.
I mean, it's monster hunter with HD graphics, while the 3DS iterations are even below what we saw on PSP in that regard.
Seems pretty shitty. Sony makes a portable with 2 analog sticks which was the main problem people had with playing MH on PSP and Capcom jumps it to some platform that has 1 stick by default unless you add on some unwieldy CPP. No doubt if this game was on Sony's platform it would probably move units in Japan so really if there is some sort of payed exclusive stuff it is Sony's fault for not wrapping that up. If I recall 3DS wasn't exactly setting the world on fire when this shift in MH happened either.
It is possible, but keep in mind that if such game excisted, a lot more would be buying the system. When more people own a system, more publishers will find it easier to release games for it. How big attach ratio it would be is very hard to say because the hardware sales for the Vita would be different than what it is today if a Monster Hunter game excisted for it.Yes but if Someone buys a platform they're going to want to buy games for a platform. They're not gonna let it sit around playing expsnisve psp games (which they get used cheaper and play on an actual psp), or whatever unique digital releases the Vita has. They going to want to buy the biggest games on the platform. Hundreds of thousands aren't gonna hold out waiting for the possible of that has even annouced and may never come. So it seems illogical to assume that just because MH is sold on the Vita that the it'd start get 70-90% if higher attach ratio when everything else has about 20.
Eventually there is going to be a sales breakpoint for the vita where any developer interested in taking advantage of the higher power or various other features only the vita offers will see it as worthwhile enough and then from that point on things will only be looking up. It doesn't really make much difference how many sub 15k sales months it takes to reach that point or how many times people claim that it's now officially dead.
I might be starting some shit but which game is better? MH looks better, but which has better gameplay?
Yeah but that was from less popular platform to a more popular platform. In this situation the 3DS is the PS2 and Capcom have little reason to leave.
Eventually there is going to be a sales breakpoint for the vita where any developer interested in taking advantage of the higher power or various other features only the vita offers will see it as worthwhile enough and then from that point on things will only be looking up.
Seems pretty shitty. Sony makes a portable with 2 analog sticks which was the main problem people had with playing MH on PSP and Capcom jumps it to some platform that has 1 stick by default unless you add on some unwieldy CPP. No doubt if this game was on Sony's platform it would probably move units in Japan so really if there is some sort of payed exclusive stuff it is Sony's fault for not wrapping that up. If I recall 3DS wasn't exactly setting the world on fire when this shift in MH happened either.
If I recall 3DS wasn't exactly setting the world on fire when this shift in MH happened either.
Yeah but that was from less popular platform to a more popular platform. In this situation the 3DS is the PS2 and Capcom have little reason to leave.
Which platform is more popular likely has zero influence over capcom when it comes to MH, whichever platform they put an exclusive MH game on is then the most popular one and a large part of why 3ds is having the sales numbers it is in japan is because of MH4 alone.
If Sony wants to save Vita there will be a Monster Hunter Portable released for it. Capcom and Nintendo exclusive games don't exactly have a history of staying exclusive, even when Nintendo makes a big fuss about them being exclusive. Resident Evil is the poster boy of this, with every entry they've made except RE0 and REmake being ported to other non-Nintendo platforms.
Seems pretty shitty. Sony makes a portable with 2 analog sticks which was the main problem people had with playing MH on PSP and Capcom jumps it to some platform that has 1 stick by default unless you add on some unwieldy CPP. No doubt if this game was on Sony's platform it would probably move units in Japan so really if there is some sort of payed exclusive stuff it is Sony's fault for not wrapping that up. If I recall 3DS wasn't exactly setting the world on fire when this shift in MH happened either.
Resident Evil: Revelations was evidently made with the plan to always port it to PS3/360. 3DS is the dominant platform in Japan, and the dominant handheld worldwide.
The 3DS was never doing as poorly as the Vita has, though.
Uh... DS was considerably more popular than PSP.
It is possible, but keep in mind that if such game excisted, a lot more would be buying the system. When more people own a system, more publishers will find it easier to release games for it. How big attach ratio it would be is very hard to say because the hardware sales for the Vita would be different than what it is today if a Monster Hunter game excisted for it.
Install base of Xbox 360 and ps3 dwarfs 3DS. It's the exact same example.
I never said it would show up en masse, I said developers would decide to make games for it once it reached a point where the install base was large enough they deemed it worthy. That is just common sense.
however in japan 3ds userbase will surpass ps3 and 360 combined probably next month
There's a bit difference with the Resident Evil situation: Monster Hunter is actually selling extremely well on 3DS (way, way above Capcom's expectations); also: Nintendo is distributing the game in the West. Add to that the money from the exclusivity contract, and you can clearly see how Monster Hunter is likely to stay on Nintendo hardware with all the relevant entry, at least in the next few years.
Quick, point me to an example of this happening in the past. I have a feeling I'll be waiting a while.
I doubt Capcom is looking to segregate the user base on this one but i could be wrong. I imagine the 3 years thing is just a fail safe, I don't think we'll see MH returning to Sony portables in any relevant form.
Quick, point me to an example of this happening in the past. I have a feeling I'll be waiting a while.
That third party lineup for the 3DS sure was so much better then the vita one at launch and for a while after launch wasn't it.
Then it reached a sales point where developers deemed it worthy of making there games for it and look where it's at now.
PS3 has no games, am I right?
You are being hostile for no real reason and that is all you have to challenge my statement with?