It was just a blurry unboxing video.Were his Youtube videos removed? What did they show?
It was just a blurry unboxing video.Were his Youtube videos removed? What did they show?
Ok, that makes sense I guess.pretty much i would think unless MS stops the auto bans
but thats how they do it on 360 and that will be how it works on the One.
If you play a unreleased game on 360 well before the street date or in some cases 2 days before, it gets your console banne dbecause they think its pirated
Were his Youtube videos removed? What did they show?
They finally started to look good to me after watching that 12 minute dash demo. I was really impressed.
Not according to The Verge.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/9/5083780/xbox-one-early-pre-order-deliveries
Oh right yeah, that was a nice video. I forgot amongst all the negativity.
I just really want this guy to get unbanned, it's so wrong.
He should expect the product reasonably delivered WHEN HE RECEIVES IT!He can't sue MS because he can recover his money and expenses from Target, should he not opt to just get a new console at the date of promised delivery. Brochures are irrelevant because he could not have reasonably expected the product to be delivered before the agreed date of delivery, in particular in the context of a new product launch.
It was just a blurry unboxing video.
The worst unboxing video you'll ever see.
Has it been removed or blocked?
Has it been removed or blocked?
Has it been removed or blocked?
Has it been removed or blocked?
Has it been removed or blocked?
I hate to be that guy considering at some point I will actually buy an XB1... but when have Microsoft ever looked good this year? it's just one colossal fuck up after another PR wise.
If this guy isn't unbanned by the 15th I'm sure he will have a pretty solid case against them.
Aw, come on! I was having a good Microsoft day! Free Killer Instinct, more games on PC, and a cool kinect feature. Why'd you have to mess up and do an interview?
If this is true, its just as bad.
And it sounds like a false claim. If the DMCA weren't an anti consumer sham then that part of the act would be enforced as well and MS would get in trouble for it but sadly the government doesn't enforce that stuff.Microsoft did copyright claim to take it down. And that guy is actually a YouTuber, so they flagged his account for 1 strike as well, he lost thousands of views from this and it potentially can harm his income.
Microsoft did copyright claim to take it down. And that guy is actually a YouTuber, so they flagged his account for 1 strike as well, he lost thousands of views from this and it potentially can harm his income.
MS actually made a copyright claim on it. Another ridiculous thing they did.
It's been removed.
Yessir. Copyright something or another.
The people defending these anti consumer bannings are making me really fucking see how toxic of a place NeoGAF is. Jesus christ what is wrong with you people
Microsoft did copyright claim to take it down. And that guy is actually a YouTuber, so they flagged his account for 1 strike as well, he lost thousands of views from this and it potentially can harm his income.
It might actually be worse. How is it copyright infringement to make an unboxing video of a product you own? It's simple abuse of the Youtube reporting system to maintain their embargo.
Right, and he isn't being punished if he has remedies available, which he does. Target and the buyer both knew that this product may not function before the launch date and therefore the goods are non-conforming and performance has not been fulfilled. Shipping a product that does not work until the implicitly agreed date shifts the risk of loss to the buyer, which is not acceptable and therefore Target has to accept the product back and make a proper performance.He should expect the product reasonably delivered WHEN HE RECEIVES IT!
He shouldn't be punished for receiving a product. Period.
I would bet money Sony would not ban a customer if the exact same thing happened with a PS4.
Continuing to fall on their sword after banning paying customers who got your console or game early, attempting to take away those same paying customers consumer rights. Yeah I've seen less dedication to actual family members.I don't think Sony is dumb enough to do those kinds of bans.
Not according to The Verge.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/9/5083780/xbox-one-early-pre-order-deliveries
Right, and he isn't being punished if he has remedies available, which he does. Target and the buyer both knew that this product may not function before the launch date and therefore the goods are non-conforming and performance has not been fulfilled. Shipping a product that does not work until the implicitly agreed date shifts the risk of loss to the buyer, which is not acceptable and therefore Target has to accept the product back and make a proper performance.
Right, and he isn't being punished if he has remedies available, which he does. Target and the buyer both knew that this product may not function before the launch date and therefore the performance has not been fulfilled. Shipping a product that does not work until the implicitly agreed date shifts the risk of loss to the buyer, which is not acceptable and therefore Target has to accept the product back and make a proper performance.
Not according to The Verge.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/9/5083780/xbox-one-early-pre-order-deliveries
Stockholm Syndrome
That claim makes no sense. Why would a youtube video lead to an console being banned? They are two separate entities.
What rule?
And how does he remedy his youtube source of income?
free to do what he wants with it.
So one user is free and the other isn't?
I would bet money Sony would not ban a customer if the exact same thing happened with a PS4.
Continuing to fall on their sword after banning paying customers who got your console or game early, attempting to take away those same paying customers consumer rights. Yeah I've seen less dedication to actual family members.I don't think Sony is dumb enough to do those kinds of bans.
You were sold a product that is tied to a service that can reasonably be expected to begin at the date of launch and the date of promised delivery. There is a mandatory date 1 patch even.What? Why would he expect it not to work? I expect anything that is sold to me as new to work.
he shouldn't be
I'm assuming the video has been banned on the grounds of transmitting an artistic work. The artistic work in this case being the packaging material where copyright subsists, namely the logos, or possibly literary works in terms of any manuals he may have shown.
No, I just love all games and manufacturers. I'm not going to sit here spitting on MS like you guys because I'm on some anti MS quest.
The guy used a product weeks early knowing he shouldn't be, and even used it for self promotion. Then he gets punished and is upset about it enough to cry about it to the world.
I find it justified and completely within reason.
so shoot me for not bearing a Sony emblazoned lightsaber.
Why should everyone know not to use a product they paid for that got shipped early? And did this particular guy say at some point he shouldn't be using his console?No, I just love all games and manufacturers. I'm not going to sit here spitting on MS like you guys because I'm on some anti MS quest.
The guy used a product weeks early knowing he shouldn't be, and even used it for self promotion. Then he gets punished and is upset about it enough to cry about it to the world.
I find it justified and completely within reason.
so shoot me for not bearing a Sony emblazoned lightsaber.
Was his youtube account banned? If so, answering that would require reading youtube TOS and I'm not really interested in touching that issue anyway.And how does he remedy his youtube source of income?
No, I just love all games and manufacturers. I'm not going to sit here spitting on MS like you guys because I'm on some anti MS quest.
The guy used a product weeks early knowing he shouldn't be, and even used it for self promotion. Then he gets punished and is upset about it enough to cry about it to the world.
I find it justified and completely within reason.
so shoot me for not bearing a Sony emblazoned lightsaber.