Milly Osworth
Member
You need to be a rocket surgeon to buy the right tv these days.
KS8000 55 inch goes for a little over 1800 euro in the Netherlands
https://tweakers.net/pricewatch/519851/samsung-ue55ks8000-zwart.html
A lot more expensive than US prices, but so are all other tv's.
If I understood correctly a 1080p tv with 50Hz refresh rate ( which I own atm ) is way faster ( inputlag and response ) than a fancy tv with all the digital bells and whistles. Is it safe to say that a 50Hz 4K HDR10 capabele set will also perform better when it comes to gaming?
For all I know that gamemode on any tv will set 100/200Hz etc to 50Hz. For me personally , who will be using this tv purely for gaming, 50Hz might be the way to go as it is cheaper.
Sony has released some new models in August ( at least in the Netherlands ) which could do the trick ( 4K HDR10, although no info is geven on brightness ).
Models are:
- 49XD 8005
- 49XD 8077/ 8088 / 8099
Yeah, it blows my mind how people can bust 5k on a 4K TV at this point.Basically your choices are:
1. Spend $5+k, and be super pissed in 1-2 years when it doesn't meet some new standard as 4K solidifies
2. Wait 2 years and spend $1k
I am in team 2, especially considering I have a really nice Sony 1080p low input lag panel + receiver.
Save for UHD blurays, a few things on Netflix, and high end PCs, there really isn't much 4K content at native resolution. It's like trying to have 1080p in the early 2000s. Did you miss it then? I didn't.
Ouch that panel is a friggen booby trap lol.
Do not get that damned thing. I swear this kind of stuff is almost straight up illegal.
The USA and EU models don't match.KS8000 55 inch goes for a little over 1800 euro in the Netherlands
https://tweakers.net/pricewatch/519851/samsung-ue55ks8000-zwart.html
A lot more expensive than US prices, but so are all other tv's.
Can you elaborate?
This was not thread worthy.
What is the uk model for this? I cant find anything on amazon or even the sony uk site is not clear. I want the 43" model as dont have space for anything bigger
I think the 8005 is the same range as the TV in the OP, only larger. So there should be a 43XD8005 as well
btw what is the equivalent model no. for Euro?
I hate how AV companies name their models differently in each part of the world, so confusing
http://ca.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/x850d
any downsides in going with the next model up? specifically the 55"
Its only 650 at amazon now, 2016 set that ticks many boxes, i think its good deal thread worthyWe create threads now with will recuse reviewed tv's from every company?
Does Sony still use Android on their sets? I heard horrible reviews about that.
What is theNIT output for this TV, Sony have refused to publish them.
Why? Because they likely don't meet 1000
Still not sure if this tv has hdr10 ?
I don't get it either. There's a general thread for TV talk where people with knowledge tend to dwell. Threads like these are very prone for incorrect information.We create threads now with will recuse reviewed tv's from every company?
Does Sony still use Android on their sets? I heard horrible reviews about that.
UHD premium requires 1000 for LCD and 540 for OLED.Chû Totoro;216466114 said:Doesn't HDR10 mean it's at least 1000?
From what I read on the Sony site the two models are basically identical except for motionflow performance.
X800: 200Hz
X850: 800Hz
Chû Totoro;216466114 said:Doesn't HDR10 mean it's at least 1000?
In the UK its XD8077/8099, assume its the same for the rest of Europe? No idea why it has 8077/8099.
Link incase you are in the UK http://www.johnlewis.com/sony-bravi...3_1473371087_c81409f54d17103060c444a14ed88a33
thanks. ok i found this on amz uk
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01HM7JPMW/
seems to be the black bezel and the one i want
are these sets 10bit color - i cant seem to find any confirmation of this.
Tempting, even though I wonder if it'll be a noticeable difference when switching from a 3ms to 30ms input lag display... other than that it sounds like a solid choice.
I take it only Sony TVs with the "x-tended dynamic range pro" bullshit provide proper HDR with 1000+ nits? So not this.
Man I hate the TV industry. I honestly do. Such a huge amount of purposeful confusion, every time. And now we have "real HDR" and "poor man's HDR", plus the whole HDR10/Dolby Vision format war. Get it together people, jesus.
They are 10 bit panels, but they are not HDR10. They will for the price still deliver amazing color and picture though and a decent form of HDR. If you want HDR10 for cheap.....you're not going to find it sadly
They are 10 bit panels, but they are not HDR10. They will for the price still deliver amazing color and picture though and a decent form of HDR. If you want HDR10 for cheap.....you're not going to find it sadly
It'll be VERY noticeable. Gaming limit must be under 20 ms. People used to play with higher input lag are so mad.
Oh well, so the wait for HDR 4K monitors in 2017 begins...
Yeah it's going to take a while to show up in PC monitors as Win 10 anniversary was the first OS to gain HDR support and very few graphics cards support it (The new Polaris and Pascal ones do for example)
See my post.
HDR10 is essentially a data format
Like MP3 vs OGG
You can have totally mediocre TV that supports HDR10, almost all of the current 4K Tvs are exactly that.
In my case, or rather at my viewing distance, 4K starts to make sense on bigger TVs and projector screens. Not sure how big though, I'm sure there is a graph for this but maybe 65" and above?
I don't know of any monitor or HDTV that has a 3ms of input lag.Tempting, even though I wonder if it'll be a noticeable difference when switching from a 3ms to 30ms input lag display... other than that it sounds like a solid choice.
They are 10 bit panels, but they are not HDR10. They will for the price still deliver amazing color and picture though and a decent form of HDR. If you want HDR10 for cheap.....you're not going to find it sadly
I think the 8005 is the same range as the TV in the OP, only larger. So there should be a 43XD8005 as well
I take it only Sony TVs with the "x-tended dynamic range pro" bullshit provide proper HDR with 1000+ nits? So not this.
Man I hate the TV industry. I honestly do. Such a huge amount of purposeful confusion, every time. And now we have "real HDR" and "poor man's HDR", plus the whole HDR10/Dolby Vision format war. Get it together people, jesus.
I don't know of any monitor or HDTV that has a 3ms of input lag.
If you're below 20ms on a HDTV you're already the very top of the line in that category.
Im limited by space really, max tv size i can have is 43" which is not ideal. I sit 2m away. Guess il wait till 2017 and see if sony has sorted its act out by then..
This 10bit color and HDR shit is so confusing :/
I don't know of any monitor or HDTV that has a 3ms of input lag.
If you're below 20ms on a HDTV you're already the very top of the line in that category.
My apologies everyone pretty much has. Its a bad panel not actually true HD with the wrong pixel setup. Its literally sneaking into the market on bullshit.
edit RTings seems to have corrected it and said it has a 10bit panel so I removed that from the original comment. That leaves the pixel setup which is actually not true 4k.
And no local dimming and its edge lit. Sort of double not wanteds as we move forward.
Shame it's no where near that price in EU even with Euro=$