Why do you feel the need to post this in every Fallout thread? I mean, It's okay to like the dumber one of the two games more, I'm just confused as to why you want to make your preference heard all the time without adding nothing to the conversation
e: unless it's some elaborate joke due to your tag or something lol
Oh I can add plenty to the conversation, but there are those here that regularly do it better than I. Not to mention 90% of my posting is done from my phone whilst doing other things.
Odd that you notice my voice out of the thousands of "Save us Obsidian" "lol Bethesda" "Don't Believe his Lies" "Gamebryo haha" etc etc comments that litter every single Fallout 3/4/NV thread. (This thread not excluded)
The world of Fallout 3 just felt better than NV in every way. Made much better use of the FP perspective. The DC wasteland was more exciting to explore than the Mojave. The quests, while not always has complex, were more memorable. The storyline, while admittedly full of plotholes, felt more cohesive. The towns and characters were more iconic.
Everything NV did well was an iteration of what was established in FO3. So much so that most of the biggest improvements of NV already existed as mods for FO3.
Also, this articles biggest issue with FO3, the timeline and stagnation of tech/progress, is also a problem in NV. (And LoTR, and just about any other fantasy world)
If Fallout 4 is released and is somehow still considered inferior to NV then we can talk, but as of now, Obsidian stood on the shoulders of Bethsda's work to make New Vegas. Nothing is to say the improvements of NV wouldn't have been made by further Besthda iteration on the franchise.