Wickerbasket
Member
For a platform starved for content, they don't seem to be buying many games.No I dont. All those titles should do fine for Wii U. Especially a platform starved for content.
For a platform starved for content, they don't seem to be buying many games.No I dont. All those titles should do fine for Wii U. Especially a platform starved for content.
For a platform starved for content, they don't seem to be buying many games.
Which was my original point.there haven't been many games released. it's sort of a problem.
I forgot about Sonic; I stand by my original statement though.
Wind Waker HD is going to be one of the only games worth buying up until it's release, but I don't think that's going to help it because of its high price.
Which was my original point.
I don't think a HD rerelease of a 10 year old title is going to have much of an impact at that price, even if it's one of the only games worth buying up until that point.
They should have priced it at a budget price.
Honestly, I probably would be surprised. The console it's being rereleased on isn't any more popular than the Gamecube, and I'd wager that most of the people who own a Wii U currently are Nintendo fans who've played Wind Waker.I think you'll be surprised what 10 years + having released on a relatively unpopular console would mean for the game. It might not be a new game, but if Nintendo bothers to push / advertise it, plenty of consumers wouldn't know or care.
No, my original point was that the game was being sent to die at that price point. I don't think there's a huge market for a full priced HD remake on a console with poor software sales. I could be wrong though.i thought your original point was that tww hd, the only game coming out for the wii u this year (aside from w101, sonic, dk, scribblenauts, mario, wii party, and wii fit) wasn't going to do much for the system.
the idea is to build a fanbase. nintendo is doing that by appealing to a particular market. there aren't people who will buy a wii u for zelda, but there are people who might buy one for zelda, and sonic, or zelda and mario, or zelda, mario, dk, and w101.
they haven't had the luxury of having a bunch of first-party titles three months apart to drive sales until now.
- One of the most popular Zelda titles.
- Actual reworking done the the mechanics and design.
- More than just basic resolution upgrades
- A few new things
Nintendo
Yeah, I expected $60. Have you seen their VC prices? Why would they only charge a slightly doubled price when they have to worry about packaging and whatnot on top of actually improving the game? Genuinely asking.
Do you know how many people bought the game 10 years ago? Something about 2% of today's potential market.You're definitely right though, there will be people who've never played the game before that might see the value in it at full price, I'm just not sure it will be that many.
I think you'll be surprised what 10 years + having released on a relatively unpopular console would mean for the game. It might not be a new game, but if Nintendo bothers to push / advertise it, plenty of consumers wouldn't know or care.
Not the Wii U's actual market though.Do you know how many people bought the game 10 years ago? Something about 2% of today's potential market.
Honestly, I probably would be surprised. The console it's being rereleased on isn't any more popular than the Gamecube, and I'd wager that most of the people who own a Wii U currently are Nintendo fans who've played Wind Waker.
Granted it might look like a new game to some, but I still think it would do much better at a budget price.
The game just don't look like great value when you consider other HD remakes like FFX|X2 being priced at £10 - £15 cheaper. You're definitely right though, there will be people who've never played the game before that might see the value in it at full price, I'm just not sure it will be that many.
No, my original point was that the game was being sent to die at that price point. I don't think there's a huge market for a full priced HD remake on a console with poor software sales. I could be wrong though.
FFX|X2 remaster is £25 and comes with two games.Wow, I was wondering why there was 9 pages of discussion on a $10 price cut. You people seriously thought it'd be $20-$30? Hilarious.
Did they add that dungeon that was cut from the original due to time constraints? It always bugged me I went into some cave and some dude just *gave* me one of the medallions (or whatever it was at the time) without having to do anything.
FFX|X2 remaster is £25 and comes with two games.
Wind Waker HD is £40.
That would still make a lot of happy people. Kids getting this remake for Christmas will feel a joy few games can bring.It could have a 100% attach rate to the Wii U and not outsell the original Wind Waker.
There would be even more happy people/kids if they priced it in line with other better value HD remakes.That would still make a lot of happy people. Kids getting this remake for Christmas will feel a joy few games can bring.
I think you'll be surprised what 10 years + having released on a relatively unpopular console would mean for the game. It might not be a new game, but if Nintendo bothers to push / advertise it, plenty of consumers wouldn't know or care.
Wow, I was wondering why there was 9 pages of discussion on a $10 price cut. You people seriously thought it'd be $20-$30? Hilarious.
FFX|X2 remaster is £25 and comes with two games.
Wind Waker HD is £40.
FFX/X2 is a great counter example. Squeenix redid all the models and textures in both games.
unfortunately x-2 still comes with x, which forced them to mark the price down.
FFX|X2 remaster is £25 and comes with two games.
Wind Waker HD is £40.
FFX/X2 is a great counter example. Squeenix redid the models and textures in both games. If only they had added some eye-melting bloom, then they could charge full price for it!
So if they think it could sell for $50 they should sell it for $30 so they don't look arrogant? Isn't that just confidence? Saying "we have a product for people without broadband, it's called the 360" is arrogant. Saying "people will get a second job to pay for our $600 console" is arrogant. Where are the arrogant Nintendo quotes? "Please understand"?
Did people also complain when Ocarina of Time 3D was $39.99?
Yes, though I personally felt it was worth the price for the portability of one of my favourite games of all time, but not everyone felt the same.Did people also complain when Ocarina of Time 3D was $39.99?
Did people also complain when Ocarina of Time 3D was $39.99?
Did people also complain when Ocarina of Time 3D was $39.99?
Yes but it had the oot factor to diminish itDid people also complain when Ocarina of Time 3D was $39.99?
Do you know how many people bought the game 10 years ago? Something about 2% of today's potential market.
TWW improves on OOT in a number of ways.Yes but it had the oot factor to diminish it
Did people also complain when Ocarina of Time 3D was $39.99?
TWW improves on OOT in a number of ways.
That was a complete graphical overhaul, but that price was still silly.
In this case people are more laughing at the OP saying this is a "great deal".
Then all the industry is overpriced, as these still stand as some of the best games money can buy.OoT was also overpriced.
Look, this isn't about getting angry. It's just calling it like it is. Both games are overpriced. And if you argue against that, then there is something wrong with you.
LOL, WW is complete crap compared to OOT.
Then all the industry is overpriced, as these still stand as some of the best games money can buy.
FFX|X2 remaster is £25 and comes with two games.
Wind Waker HD is £40.