... Context please? LolThe world needs Walton Goggins bringing this scene to life.
... Context please? LolThe world needs Walton Goggins bringing this scene to life.
AKA Affordable Tom Hardy.
So, my only Tom Hardy experience has been as a not-so-great Bane. What should I watch in order to appreciate this guy's acting chops?
... Context please? Lol
... Context please? Lol
Spider-Man 1 and 2 are considered great to excellent films.It has nothing to do with the character not being a part of the MCU than it's Sony by themselves not being able to make a good Spider-Man film in almost 15 years. They're so clueless nowadays that they just let someone else deal with it than them actually trying to come up with something good by themselves.
Plus, a Spider-Man universe is just dumb.
It's simultaneously the worst, best, and only comic book adaptation he has been in.DKR was amazing?
Man comic book fans are worse than star wars.
I'm delighted this is happening. Best villain, Hardy is proven, no idea about the director tbh.
Thor 2 was better than Spider-Man 2.Spider-Man 1 and 2 are considered great to excellent films.
The Amazing Spider-Man received reviews that are in-line with Captain America, Iron Man 2, Ant Man, etc. So how was it not a good film if those MCU films are considered good? Was it in the upper echelon of comic book films? No. But it was pretty well received as a good movie.
It's like you all forget Elektra, Daredevil, Catwoman, X3, Wolverine, Thor 2, Ghost Rider, et al when you think about bad superhero movies.
Thor 2 was better than Spider-Man 2.
praise be to the god
Don't care.
It's just another bad attempt by Sony to make a Spider-Man film universe. Only this time it's a Spider-Man film universe without Spider-Man in it.
It's gonna suck.
Sony should just try and get Raimi, Tobey Maguire, and Kirsten Dunst back and make a Renew Your Vows Spider-Man movie.
Yeah, he normally does well in the roles he's in for movies.tom hardy doesnt take bad roles. excited
Don't care.
It's just another bad attempt by Sony to make a Spider-Man film universe. Only this time it's a Spider-Man film universe without Spider-Man in it.
It's gonna suck.
Sony should just try and get Raimi, Tobey Maguire, and Kirsten Dunst back and make a Renew Your Vows Spider-Man movie.
Sooo... I'm a bit confused. So Sony made a deal with Disney that allows Disney to use Spider-Man in the MCU. If they are building their own extended universe starting with Venom, does it connect to the Homecoming Spider-Man, Amazing Spider-Man or a new Sony Spider-Man? Can't keep my Peter Parkers straight...
Marvel Studios never should have agreed to help with Spider-Man: Homecoming unless they had full control (or final approval) of Spiderverse films.
Marvel Studios never should have agreed to help with Spider-Man: Homecoming unless they had full control (or final approval) of Spiderverse films.
Yeah and it's over hated. Most of the problems with SM3 were not Raimi's fault.That sounds like an horrifically terrible idea. Have you seen Spider Man 3?
Don't care.
It's just another bad attempt by Sony to make a Spider-Man film universe. Only this time it's a Spider-Man film universe without Spider-Man in it.
It's gonna suck.
Sony should just try and get Raimi, Tobey Maguire, and Kirsten Dunst back and make a Renew Your Vows Spider-Man movie.
Yeah and it's over hated. Most of the problems with SM3 were not Raimi's fault.
Also ASM 2 is a way worst film.
From Marvel Axis, where villains and heroes had their moral "axises" flipped.
Carange became a good guy
Have you read Renew Your Vows cause it's the best Spider-Man book on the market since Marvel made the mistake to get rid of Spider-Man's marriage to Mary Jane, and would make a great movie.trash-tier move
"It doeshhn't maahhtaa who weee ahhh. What matttas ish ahhh plahhhn"What, Bane was great.
Cant believe people are betting against this movie.. But whats Gaf without a crow diet.
Tom Hardy >
Sony forced Raimi to use Venom.
They didn't force him to have Peter Parker dance around in two awkward scenes, retcon Uncle Ben's death so that it randomly involved Sandman, insert a terrible amnesia plot or have Harry's butler save the day.
And then a final film, where the primary villain is Jack O'Lantern, a childish, completely absurd and evil lunatic that declares that he will be Flash's arch-nemesis and finds out his true identity, but also sees him as a kindred spirit and almost like a brother:
To be honest, Venom #22 featuring the final battle between Venom and Jack was an amazing culmination of their feud, and would be a pretty beautiful ending to a film, as Flash turns away from the darkness and into the light, and embraces being a real hero.
If they are smart they will use more or less Flash Thompson origin but make the character Eddie brock
Spider-Man 1 and 2 are considered great to excellent films.
The Amazing Spider-Man received reviews that are in-line with Captain America, Iron Man 2, Ant Man, etc. So how was it not a good film if those MCU films are considered good? Was it in the upper echelon of comic book films? No. But it was pretty well received as a good movie.
It's like you all forget Elektra, Daredevil, Catwoman, X3, Wolverine, Thor 2, Ghost Rider, et al when you think about bad superhero movies.
I felt that movie was slept on. I liked it.I think it it might be a remote possibility that Sony could cast Daniel Craig as Carnage. Have you guys seen the Jacket? He would make a good Cleetus Kassidy.
Can someone reccomend me some Venom & Some Carnage Comics to read, other than Maximum Carnage thats the only One i have read, thanks
Can someone reccomend me some Venom & Some Carnage Comics to read, other than Maximum Carnage thats the only One i have read, thanks
Agent Venom would be the better choice, but I just don't trust current day Sony Pictures with such a strong concept, even if they do have a good director and Hardy behind it.