I've added something extra to the article.
average PlayStation 4 performance may be ~55fps
That would mean huge or constant dips to go as low as 55 fps average.
A few small dips would put the average at 58 or even 59.
I've added something extra to the article.
average PlayStation 4 performance may be ~55fps
I read his update correctly.
It's probably best to lock it before the PC dick waving and the PS4 dick waving tangle up a bunch of dicks and we end up with a dick king.I feel like this thread is on the verge of being locked, what with all the PC dick waving, lol.
Just no dude, the Titan doesn't get 60 fps 100% of the time on Tomb Raider with everything cranked up sorry.
http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/645/bench/Ultimate_1680.png[IMG]
This benchmark isnt even on 1080p and it gets a min fps of 19. That's with FXAA on not even SSAA the better AA technique the game has...[/QUOTE]
That came from [URL="http://kotaku.com/5990848/tomb-raider-performance-test-graphics-and-cpus"]here[/URL], I guess?
[QUOTE]We're using Fraps to measure frame rates during 90 seconds of gameplay footage from Tomb Raider's first level, the checkpoint is called "Stun." The test begins with Lara running to escape from a cave system.[/QUOTE]
I tried to do the exact same spot myself with FRAPS, though I managed to make it to the cutscene in ~75 seconds from the checkpoint, so I must have started the benchmark too late or I really sped through that section.
Frames 7744
Time (ms) 75187
Min 48
Max 232 (I have no idea where this came from, maybe in the blank screen before the prerendered cutscene plays?)
Avg 102.997
That's with a GTX 770, which costs considerably less than a Titan. I tested it at the same 1680x1050 resolution and "Ultimate" graphics preset they used. At 1920x1080, I got an average framerate of 87.395.
The only thing I want to point out with this is that benchmark is out of date compared to the most up-to-date game version and GPU drivers.
Also, for the record, I think the PS4 version is a -great- deal vs running it on my [B]$1100[/B] PC.
Not really.
Most console peeps don't give two shits about PCs. .
Locked at 60?I feel like this thread is on the verge of being locked, what with all the PC dick waving, lol.
That would mean huge or constant dips to go as low as 55 fps average.
A few small dips would put the average at 58 or even 59.
This is a joke post, right? Because if not, WTF.
The relevancy to he topic ends there. We have no barometer on how the WiiU version performs because it doesn't exist.Yes, but TR came on other platforms except one. I saw this as the main discussion is about PS4 and XB1, but because TR is on PC, 360 and PS3 we can compare them. The reason the Wii U is being discussed is because it has been left out.
That sounds better as a xbox owner. I would still prefer the option of lower resolution for higher fps, but atleast its over 30.
Mass Effect 2 reference. You know, the last good ME game.
If it's a ME3 reference, I'll have to go fuck myself.
I'm confused by this post though I shouldn't be.
Not really.
Most console peeps don't give two shits about PCs. It's PC people that come into threads about Tomb Raider wanting to tell all the console pleebs the "Definitive Edition" isn't really definitive because they played the game on their amazing PC at 60fps.
Of course when the facts come out, and the PS4 version actually runs at 60 as well, then some people take that opportunity to fire back.
But it all begins with the PC defense force. Not the other way around.
Locked at 60?
I'm going to go in an area with very little geometry and look at a wall and then downwards. I will do this for 10 hours and then I will start playing the game.
That way my average frame rate will be 59fps on PS4 and 40fps on Xbone.
PC only crowd gets a free pass to port beg and shit up threads.
PC is obsolete by a piece of hardware with tablet specs because it's able to do 1080p. Laughable.
Could you quote the several posters that said this? I only saw one that got a lot of backlash.Works both ways, you have PS4 fans in this thread calling PCs obsolete[...]
The biggest irony is some of Microsofts (First and third party) biggest franchises have been 60FPS while most of Sonys best loved games (Bar GT) have struggled to Mantain a locked 30FPS.
This TR news really has me more annoyed at some of these other multiplatform games on next gen. For example, Need for Speed: Rivals. Runs at 1080p 30fps on both consoles, with a few extra effects on PS4. It really makes me wonder why some devs aren't pushing the PS4 version.
I'm going to go in an area with very little geometry and look at a wall and then downwards. I will do this for 10 hours and then I will start playing the game.
That way my average frame rate will be 59fps on PS4 and 40fps on Xbone.
PS4 dick waving is better than PC dick waving... apparently lol
Let's wait for Digital Foundry before we conclude that the Xbone version is over 30 FPS on average.
I feel like this thread is on the verge of being locked, what with all the PC dick waving, lol.
Works both ways, you have PS4 fans in this thread calling PCs obsolete and saying that the console is superior to PCs because of the price and things like that. Not that I really disagree with that mind you, I like my PS4 and I think it's a great machine. I still love my PC and all the advantages it brings too.
I just find it funny how some people would like to be left alone in their consoles threads arguing like if they were in a vacuum and there was nothing else around them.
If this thread gets locked it better be at page 60 lol
You get more bang for your buck with PS4.PS4 dick waving is better than PC dick waving... apparently lol
What is you point, coming into a console thread to tell everyone you played the game at better settings ?????
How is it relevant, and why do PC players ALWAYS do this on console comparison threads.
Do you think we are impressed ?
Does it add to the discussion ?
Do you think we want to run out and build a gaming rig ?
Or do PC players like to show off their specs (my GPU is bigger) ?
Its afternoon where I am - do you think we all live in USA ?
Works both ways, you have PS4 fans in this thread calling PCs obsolete and saying that the console is superior to PCs because of the price and things like that. Not that I really disagree with that mind you, I like my PS4 and I think it's a great machine. I still love my PC and all the advantages it brings too.
I just find it funny how some people would like to be left alone in their consoles threads arguing like if they were in a vacuum and there was nothing else around them.
If this thread gets locked it better be at page 60 lol
Locked at 60?
PS4 dick waving is better than PC dick waving... apparently lol
Did you miss the original quote where dude said fucking gaming pcs are obselete because of ps4 or are just going to pretend that I decided to respond to this air
whats confusing about it ?
This appears to be this poster's modus operandi. See for example:
PS4 dick waving is better than PC dick waving... apparently lol
Did you miss the original quote where dude said fucking gaming pcs are obselete because of ps4 or are just going to pretend that I decided to respond to this air? Does what he said some how enlighten this already pathetic thread? No.
And of course you didn't go back and look.. That would require 10 second of clicking the quote icon next to a message.
PS4 dicks are smaller and sleeker, and they look great sitting under your television, so people don't seem to mind as much when they're waved around.
I suppose even the fact that you had to ask the question says enough about the level of communication between different players
He did not call PC's Obsolete - its just that PC experience is not relevant to some console players and this thread.
Did you miss the original quote where dude said fucking gaming pcs are obselete because of ps4 or are you just going to pretend that I decided to respond to thin air? Does what he said some how enlighten this already pathetic thread? No.
That came from here, I guess?
I tried to do the exact same spot myself with FRAPS, though I managed to make it to the cutscene in ~75 seconds from the checkpoint, so I must have started the benchmark too late or I really sped through that section.
Frames 7744
Time (ms) 75187
Min 48
Max 232 (I have no idea where this came from, maybe in the blank screen before the prerendered cutscene plays?)
Avg 102.997
That's with a GTX 770, which costs considerably less than a Titan. I tested it at the same 1680x1050 resolution and "Ultimate" graphics preset they used. At 1920x1080, I got an average framerate of 87.395.
The only thing I want to point out with this is that benchmark is out of date compared to the most up-to-date game version and GPU drivers.
Also, for the record, I think the PS4 version is a -great- deal vs running it on my $1100 PC.
Anyone could have predicted this before. Just look at this comparison chart, it clearly shows the difference between the systems.
I wonder if this is going to be the norm for multiplats.
Read back a few pages - yes I did miss the post you replied to, as you missed my apology.
You see, it is easy to miss posts, especially quick threads like this.
No need to swear or be aggressive though. Play
nice