Prisoner KSC2-303
Member
Do we have any context for this yet beyond one side of the story?
Nope. Sorry, no.
It's totally reasonable to wonder about the context of the situation and suggest that the comedian probably didn't mean to be rude or hateful. Maybe the comedian truly didn't know the gender of the journalist and it was an honest mistake.
But what you said does not hold up and shows that you haven't even tried to put yourself in the shoes of a transgendered person. The whole point is that they identify with the opposite gender, to say 'psh, I don't see the big deal, it IS a guy' is like....I don't even know. Doesn't mean you have to be on the side of the transgendered journalist in this situation, just means you're really missing the point with that remark.
I disagree, the line "we need a woman on stage, any women here" and doing this publicly on stage.... to me that crosses monster level.
Holy shit, the fact this situation exists is pretty ridiculous. I was there and saw the whole thing. The presenter genuinely did not know whether or not is was a man/woman and didn't really say anything that could have been taken in offense. Technically, this journalist is a man, so saying that you're offended by being called one is pretty ridiculous. I wasn't even sure at the time, I just thought it was a dude with colourful hair.
I think this has been blown way out or proportion. Overreaction much...
I disagree, the line "we need a woman on stage, any women here" and doing this publicly on stage.... to me that crosses monster level.
Why didn't a Microsoft representative just start hurdling towards the stage, screaming in panic once this douchebag said this?I disagree, the line "we need a woman on stage, any women here" and doing this publicly on stage.... to me that crosses monster level.
Was the presenter's first language english? That also has a lot to do with personal pronouns (german for example).
Quoting myself again for clarficiation.
ok, except we don't know she WAS called a thing. We just knew she took it that way. She could've misheard or the person was talking about something in-game: I was at Eurogamer and the same dude was using "it" and "this thing" to refer to avatars.
people are just assuming when we don't' have all the facts.
You know for a fact that it's just a joke in bad taste and not anything more? Even if it is, why should that kind of joke be acceptable? And no, I don't have to accept people making fun of my sexuality. I'll also bet you won't like it if people make fun of you. You want to move on and let them do it again and again to you and others, have it your way. I'd rather confront them and let them know that their behavior is offensive and unwelcome.
Quoting myself again for clarficiation.
If we have the right one - and it would seem strange for two comedians with the same first name to star in one show - he is British so yes.Quoting myself again for clarficiation.
ok, except we don't know she WAS called a thing. We just knew she took it that way. She could've misheard or the person was talking about something in-game: I was at Eurogamer and the same dude was using "it" and "this thing" to refer to avatars.
people are just assuming when we don't' have all the facts.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.Tell that transgendered who are constantly harassed (sometimes violently), because that's a true witch-hunt.
Except she says she was. That doesn't mean people are assuming, it means people are believing what she says, because she was there and we weren't and she was the offended party, so she knows if she was offended.
You weren't there for this particular bit, and have no real information to add to this, and yet you're going out of your way to try and create some other context for these cruel and callous comments.
We're going off of the information available to us. We're not assuming. That's not what an assumption is. Why should we be going with "she probably misheard" or "the person was probably just talking about something in the game".
Why are you saying we should just assume she's wrong or lying?
Why didn't a Microsoft representative just start hurdling towards the stage, screaming in panic once this douchebag said this?
Look at the picture. If you didn't know, would you get the impression that person is transgender? Honestly? For a comedian, the haircut alone would warrant the "it" comment. I didn't see the picture before but I'm now convinced that the guy didn't even know she took that as an insult based on her sexuality. If that is what she currently looks like, of course.
I'm not saying you should assume she's wrong or lying, I'm saying you shouldn't assume anything at this point until we have all the facts. There is a chance everything she is saying is 100% definitely what happened and the guy was being a transphobic asshat, but we don't know that yet. She could've heard some stuff wrongly so getting your pitchforks out right now is ridiculous.
Look at the picture. If you didn't know, would you get the impression that person is transgender? Honestly? For a comedian, the haircut alone would warrant the "it" comment. I didn't see the picture before but I'm now convinced that the guy didn't even know she took that as an insult based on her sexuality. If that is what she currently looks like, of course.
Look at the picture. If you didn't know, would you get the impression that person is transgender? Honestly? For a comedian, the haircut alone would warrant the "it" comment. I didn't see the picture before but I'm now convinced that the guy didn't even know she took that as an insult based on her sexuality. If that is what she currently looks like, of course.
I just mean that it's kinda inappropriate to ask for understanding and sensibility for that guy by saying "not to start a witch hunt, when this is what happens very often to persons like the one he insulted.An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
What would going after Microsoft for what some random presenter they hired for a stage event accomplish? I understand the frustration (because holly shit, this is awful), but people need to take a deep breath, get the whole story, and let this thing play out a bit more before rushing to get their torches. Dale herself has called for calm; if she isn't going for revenge, why should you?
Look at the picture. If you didn't know, would you get the impression that person is transgender? Honestly? For a comedian, the haircut alone would warrant the "it" comment. I didn't see the picture before but I'm now convinced that the guy didn't even know she took that as an insult based on her sexuality. If that is what she currently looks like, of course.
My point is what reason do we have to doubt her information other than an incredibly flimsy "she probably just misheard him on multiple occasions"?
Look at the picture. If you didn't know, would you get the impression that person is transgender? Honestly? For a comedian, the haircut alone would warrant the "it" comment. I didn't see the picture before but I'm now convinced that the guy didn't even know she took that as an insult based on her sexuality. If that is what she currently looks like, of course.
I agree MS should apologise, purely out of professionalism, but I don't think they're to blame at all, and people using this to trash the Xbox One is just hilarious...
I'm not saying you should assume she's wrong or lying, I'm saying you shouldn't assume anything at this point until we have all the facts. There is a chance everything she is saying is 100% definitely what happened and the guy was being a transphobic asshat, but we don't know that yet. She could've heard some stuff wrongly so getting your pitchforks out right now is ridiculous.
I didn't mean you, I meant what the guy said.I use the word monster differently I guess. In my eyes monster is someone I would want nothing to do with what so ever.
Look at the picture. If you didn't know, would you get the impression that person is transgender? Honestly? For a comedian, the haircut alone would warrant the "it" comment. I didn't see the picture before but I'm now convinced that the guy didn't even know she took that as an insult based on her sexuality. If that is what she currently looks like, of course.
Of course its insulting. But insulting people in a comedy routine isnt uncommon. I think Triumph the dog referred to people as 'it' in comicon."It" is a term I use when describing materials I use during lab. "It" is not a term I'd used in any way to refer to a person. If someone cannot honestly determine why a person would be unhappy being referred to as "it", regardless of the circumstance, then that's a problem.
Oh loltaku...
Who needs editing amirite guys?
Of course its insulting. But insulting people in a comedy routine isnt uncommon. I think Triumph the dog referred to people as 'it' in comicon.
Oi, off-topic but word from the wise. Don't double post so much. If you are posting that quickly just edit it into your first post.
People at the stage "appologise that I was upset by his comments". Refused to bring him out for me to talk to.
No, internally there does need to be an assignment of blame. They need to do an AAR - or an inquest, if you prefer - and figure out precisely where the systems in place for preventing this sort of thing from happening broke down. Most likely, it was a case of simple negligence: they may have hired an "event management" company to provide extra employees for this based purely on reputation and not dug any deeper; if they hired the comedian personally, they may have done it on word-of-mouth ("This guy really knows how to work a crowd!") from industry contacts without properly vetting him (by reviewing his stage shows, speaking with him personally, etc.); they may have failed to impress upon him the limitations of his working environment with regards to how the audience should be treated while he was working in an official capacity; they may have simply failed to supervise his work properly throughout the day and not noticed that he was becoming progressively more offensive/ill-tempered as a result of normal convention fatigue.
There's a reason these things don't happen often. There are measures in place to prevent them from happening. There is a very slight outside chance that he took it upon himself to do this in a completely uncharacteristic fashion and against the orders of those who hired him, but it's far more likely someone in charge dropped the ball.
That's how business works. There's no such thing as "blameless actions". There's always someone who had the responsibility to make sure things were handled properly, and they're always expected to answer for it when they aren't. I'm not saying that someone necessarily needs to be fired, but at a minimum they need to review their policies to make sure this wasn't caused by a failure there, and then - assuming the likely event it was a human failure - seriously ask whether the person it falls on is qualified for their responsibilities.
None of this will be much comfort to the unfortunate individual the comedian harassed, but from a pure "smart business" perspective on Microsoft's part, it's what needs to happen.
Alright then how about this.
Calling someone a "thing" is never justified or excusable.
I feel like we have very few facts, and even Laura saying "I doubt it was intentional, but doesn't make it any less huniliating.". If he intended to discriminate based on gender then that's awful, but shouldn't we wait to find out what happened?
even if it's followed by "of beauty"?
That's very possible. It could've just been an anti-brony joke that went horribly wrong.I'd assume the journalist was a male MLP fan or Brony or whatever the fanbase calls itself at first glance.