where?
i'm getting into 'fuck this show' territory again. i dipped out in season 2 when they showed a close up a little boy getting a sword slowly slid into his throat - just seemed like shock bullshit, pointlessly cruel. this bullshit is just as bad.
This feels like Tywin's episode. What was filming his scene with him and Tommen like?
That was one of the greatest days I've ever had filming. To film Charles (Dance) kidnapping Lena's son with words for three minutes of monologue -- and to have Lena keeping up with him at the highest bar of acting possible with no words at all -- was a joy. It was directorial crack to do that scene. It was one of my favorite scenes I've ever shot. It's almost like a build from Ordinary People meets a Hitchcock movie, because you're sitting here going, "This is so dysfunctional and bizarre." She's a wreck. Tywin is really going on about this historical stuff, and you slowly start to go, "He's kidnapping her only boy," because she's not going to have him anymore. And then he succeeds, and then Jaime comes in and he rapes her. That was like -- you read the scene and go, "Wait, who's directing this?"
Well, that's right from the books except its a spear, and the guy who did it was a cruel individual. He got his just desserts though.where?
i'm getting into 'fuck this show' territory again. i dipped out in season 2 when they showed a close up a little boy getting a sword slowly slid into his throat - just seemed like shock bullshit, pointlessly cruel. this bullshit is just as bad.
If somebody is "giving in" to sex, they are absolutely not consenting. They're letting it happen, so they don't get hurt, and so it ends quickly.
When asked if it was a rape scene, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau said "yes and no". That's a little troubling.
When asked if it was a rape scene, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau said "yes and no". That's a little troubling.
“It is fucked up,” Coster-Waldau tells The Daily Beast. “It doesn’t get any darker than that, does it?”
“There’s a moment in the scene where the hand comes up and she has this face of disgust, and Jaime says, Why have the Gods made me love a hateful woman?” says Coster-Waldau. “He wants her, and wants everything to go back to the way it was. But there’s no way back.”
And then Jaime attacks Cersei, ripping her dress. She yells, “Jaime, not here…please…stop it!” Her objections fall on deaf ears, and he throws her first against the altar of their dead son, and then to the ground beside it.
“To understand the psychology behind it, and why he goes as far as he does, was really difficult,” says Coster-Waldau. “To me it became, When does physical desire take over? It’s one of those things where he’s been holding it back for so long, and then out of anger he grabs her, and instinct takes over, and he lets loose. He says, I don’t care. He wants to not care. He has to connect to her, and he knows this is the most fucked up way for it to happen, but in that moment, he knows it’s all he can do. It’s an act of powerlessness.”
It was straight-up rape, regardless of what the director intended.
This is more or less where I was trying to steer the conversation last night, about what it does to Jaime's characterization and how it perhaps doesn't ruin it compared to the books, but sometimes it seems exceedingly difficult to have discussions in this thread.
It was straight-up rape, regardless of what the director intended.
I hate to say it but the Sam and Gilly stuff is really bad, too. It's not like it was good in the books, but on the show it's excruciating because it eats up valuable time. I don't care about awkward, fumbling Sam and Gilly.
The show is not the book series.
It's okay for the show to portray Jamie as a rapist son of a bitch, because the creators of the show are clearly telling a different story than the one book readers have experienced.
That is a good thing, because it gives us something new rather than a cinematic retread of written materials. There's always the books for the book readers.
It was straight-up rape, regardless of what the director intended.
Yes, but what else are they going to do with Arya this season? Her going to Braavos is clearly an episode 10 moment.
I guess since Arya is a fan favorite for the show watchers, they're going to try to milk this odd duo.
I have a feeling they'll have the Drogo/fighting pit scene at the end of this season.
Sure, Mereen took fucking forever in the books, but I don't think they'll draw it out on the show.
Has it really been "years" since Ned and the girls came to King's Landing at this point? Or was that a mess up in the script when Tyrion said that Joffrey had been torturing Sansa for years?
Not sure if this was posted yet, but it's small articles like this that will have people believing it was straight up rape.
http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/04/was-th...of-thrones-the-most-disturbing-in-tv-history/
It's not. They're doing Drogo eating the little girl at the end of this season (either Episode 8 or 10 based on who directed the actor involved).
The fighting pit won't be until the end of next season.
Okay, so according to this fan made timeline that seems VERY well researched, it looks like a maybe year and a half pass between Lady getting put down (the first sign of trouble between Sansa and Joffrey) and the Purple Wedding. Ned's beheading and the PW are close to exactly a year apart.
So at least by book timing, that line was wrong.
It's not. They're doing Drogo eating the little girl at the end of this season (either Episode 8 or 10 based on who directed the actor involved).
The fighting pit won't be until the end of next season.
I'm guessing episode 10. They like doing dual meanings for their episode titles when they can, and episode 10 is titled The Children. So I'm guessing children of the forest and children killed by dragons.
My predicts:
4: She takes charge of the city
5: She rules shit, harpies are killing unsullied
6: She considers marriage
7: No Daenery
8: Drogo eats the little girl, the dragons are shackled, Khaleesi realizes she has to marry to keep the peace in Mereen
9: Marriage, and fighting scene pit, Drogo appears and flies away with Daenery.
I have a feeling they'll have the Drogo/fighting pit scene at the end of this season.
Sure, Mereen took fucking forever in the books, but I don't think they'll draw it out on the show.
Really? And then they'll have no story left for Dany next season, or even the season after that?
And this is far from being the first time that they have fucked up a character's arc. Every single character that has getting improvement over the books has come due to the actor playing them (Tywin, Olenna, Oberyn...) while every single character bed-shitting has been created as a result from the showrunner's writting (Stannis, Renly, Danerys, and now Jaime).
It's like they shot a different scene and then edited it down to what we got.
Cersei's rape scene is full of FAIL of the highest order. No, the whole "but that's coherent with Jaime, child-pushing personality" do not fly either. Jaime's arc is a redemption arc. And brilliant one, at that. Cersei's rape does not add "grey-ness" nor "struggle" to his character evolution at all because it is flat out incoherent with all his prior behaviour.
If Jaime would perform any other kind of despicable act (more child-murdering, more arrogance, whatever), I would buy that angle, but Jaime started to discover whatever little good was left inside him precisely by being moved by the amount of sexual violence and "lack of chilvarly" that women had to put up in this world (as illustrated by Brienne's travails). And now he himself takes part on that as well. It is bad writting, point blank.
In short, this is a clusterfuck, no matter how you look at it, and I am growing each time more and more tired with how David & Benioff shat the bed with character development in the name of turning characters into pallatable, easy to categorize TV tropes (Stannis the religious fanatic being manipulated by temptress) and / or getting cheap shock value scenes (like Loras getting on with a random male prostitute rather than being faithful to Renly's memory).
And this is far from being the first time that they have fucked up a character's arc. Every single character that has getting improvement over the books has come due to the actor playing them (Tywin, Olenna, Oberyn...) while every single character bed-shitting has been created as a result from the showrunner's writting (Stannis, Renly, Danerys, and now Jaime).
Sorry, but in D&B I trust no more. It is not a question of translating the book faithfully or not. I have loved many of the changes that the show has made, plot-wise. This is a question of their personal character preferences and phobias are getting translated into the show, and its quality and coherence is suffering for it. Fuck that noise.
They're lengthening the adventures of the Hound and Arya. Great change. It almost makes up a little for cutting so many of her great scenes in Season 2 and shortening her screen time back then. Her story in the books gets dull when she goes to Bravvos so I hope they push they back as much as possible.
And this is far from being the first time that they have fucked up a character's arc. Every single character that has getting improvement over the books has come due to the actor playing them (Tywin, Olenna, Oberyn...) while every single character bed-shitting has been created as a result from the showrunner's writting (Stannis, Renly, Danerys, and now Jaime)..
Seems like they are going to use the opportunity to explore the wars affect on the countryside, something I remember people were disappointed we didn't see more of last year. I wouldn't be surprised if through their story this season we get our first knowledge of Frey's being targeted, and perhaps we will also see the duo encounter the aftermath of some Frey massacre done by you-know-who.
They fast forward things and bring her on a more direct warpath towards Westeros.
I just don't think the show will survive having Dany spending the rest of this season, AND the next in Mereen doing shit all that matters to the show watchers.
I think some of you need to take a step back and consider what effect this event had on the audience.
Go ask someone who has never read a single page in the books. Ask them what happened in last night's episode.
I would wager that Ygritte head-shotting that little boy's father or Sandor Clegane stealing from the kindly old man are more often cited.
Jaime and Cersei's relationship is screwed up. Incest is a disgusting behavior between humans, and I really don't think the creators of the show intended for Jaime Lannister to humiliate or defile his sister. It was more a "Fuck me already you stupid bitch." moment. Did they fail in conveying that? Absolutely. But you have to be pretty dense if you equate the show's portrayal of attempted rape in episode 1 (the tavern scene) with what Jaime and Cersei were doing.
Before anyone drags out that stupid straw man "Are you saying she was asking for it", I despise rape in any context. I don't think it should be portrayed unless it is absolutely pivotal to a story, and I never enjoy watching it on this show.
However, as an audience member, I did not think less of Jaime Lannister as a result of what he did. He still comes across as the same desperate, depraved individual who was taught a valuable lesson on loyalty, friendship, and the dangers of overplaying his "position".
If Jaime's redemptive arc to that point in the SHOW can be summed up in "Helped Brienne escape from a bear" then it wasn't much of an arc to tear down.
Wow. He nearly killed a child, killed dozens of Stark men and his own cousin, and helped someone escape from a bear. What a guy. Brienne is the decent character as portrayed in the show, not Jaime.
It's unfortunate that rational posts like this won't prevent 20 more pages of complaints from book readers who believe they know what's best for the show because they read the same books as the writers.This times a MILLION.
Yes, Jaime raped Cersei. Yes, part of Cersei wanted it. No, just because part of Cersei wanted it doesn't make it any less of a rape. Yes, this is change from the book. Yes, it darkens Jaime's character a bit more.
But is it inconsistent with Jaime's character? Absolutely not. Jaime has both light and dark in him, in spades. That's always been consistent. In the show, Jaime feels incredibly hurt by Cersei's rejection of him. He needs to know he still has Cersei... in his mind, he's taking what is his. Even though it is rape, it's not rape in Jaime's mind.
Being on a redemptive arc doesn't mean the moral compass swings only one way. Some of the greatest characters in fiction are incredibly complex, capable of great deeds and great atrocities, all in the same day. There are people like this in the real world.
From the show's perspective, they're making Jaime into even more of a Walter White - capable of good and bad and bad and good. But whereas White Walt truly "broke bad", I think we can still be hopeful that Jaime's character overall will swing in a different direction.
Bryan Cogman will save us next week.
I think some of you need to take a step back and consider what effect this event had on the audience.
Go ask someone who has never read a single page in the books. Ask them what happened in last night's episode.
I would wager that Ygritte head-shotting that little boy's father or Sandor Clegane stealing from the kindly old man are more often cited.
Jaime and Cersei's relationship is screwed up. Incest is a disgusting behavior between humans, and I really don't think the creators of the show intended for Jaime Lannister to humiliate or defile his sister. It was more a "Fuck me already you stupid bitch." moment. Did they fail in conveying that? Absolutely. But you have to be pretty dense if you equate the show's portrayal of attempted rape in episode 1 (the tavern scene) with what Jaime and Cersei were doing.
Before anyone drags out that stupid straw man "Are you saying she was asking for it", I despise rape in any context. I don't think it should be portrayed unless it is absolutely pivotal to a story, and I never enjoy watching it on this show.
However, as an audience member, I did not think less of Jaime Lannister as a result of what he did. He still comes across as the same desperate, depraved individual who was taught a valuable lesson on loyalty, friendship, and the dangers of overplaying his "position".
If Jaime's redemptive arc to that point in the SHOW can be summed up in "Helped Brienne escape from a bear" then it wasn't much of an arc to tear down.
Wow. He nearly killed a child, killed dozens of Stark men and his own cousin, and helped someone escape from a bear. What a guy. Brienne is the decent character as portrayed in the show, not Jaime.
This times a MILLION.
Yes, Jaime raped Cersei. Yes, part of Cersei wanted it. No, just because part of Cersei wanted it doesn't make it any less of a rape. Yes, this is change from the book. Yes, it darkens Jaime's character a bit more.
But is it inconsistent with Jaime's character? Absolutely not. Jaime has both light and dark in him, in spades. That's always been consistent. In the show, Jaime feels incredibly hurt by Cersei's rejection of him. He needs to know he still has Cersei... in his mind, he's taking what is his. Even though it is rape, it's not rape in Jaime's mind.
Being on a redemptive arc doesn't mean the moral compass swings only one way. Some of the greatest characters in fiction are incredibly complex, capable of great deeds and great atrocities, all in the same day. There are people like this in the real world.
From the show's perspective, they're making Jaime into even more of a Walter White - capable of good and bad and bad and good. But whereas White Walt truly "broke bad", I think we can still be hopeful that Jaime's character overall will swing in a different direction.
Wow. He nearly killed a child, killed dozens of Stark men and his own cousin, and helped someone escape from a bear. What a guy. Brienne is the decent character as portrayed in the show, not Jaime.
This times a MILLION.
Yes, Jaime raped Cersei. Yes, part of Cersei wanted it. No, just because part of Cersei wanted it doesn't make it any less of a rape. Yes, this is change from the book. Yes, it darkens Jaime's character a bit more.
But is it inconsistent with Jaime's character? Absolutely not. Jaime has both light and dark in him, in spades. That's always been consistent. In the show, Jaime feels incredibly hurt by Cersei's rejection of him. He needs to know he still has Cersei... in his mind, he's taking what is his. Even though it is rape, it's not rape in Jaime's mind.
Being on a redemptive arc doesn't mean the moral compass swings only one way. Some of the greatest characters in fiction are incredibly complex, capable of great deeds and great atrocities, all in the same day. There are people like this in the real world.
From the show's perspective, they're making Jaime into even more of a Walter White - capable of good and bad and bad and good. But whereas White Walt truly "broke bad", I think we can still be hopeful that Jaime's character overall will swing in a different direction.
Nope. Jaime deplores rape, and has on multiple occasions expressed his disgust at the mistreatment of women. He wanted to stop King Aerys from raping his Rhaella. He came close to killing Robert after he forced Cersei on multiple occasions. He got his hand cut off in part due to preventing Brienne's rape. He executes the men who raped Pia.
Where in this does raping his own sister fit? It doesn't, at all. A few of those examples happened in the show so this isn't book exclusive stuff. Jaime has been quite consistent on rape, before and after pushing Bran.
No one is arguing Jaime's moral compass has gone from bad to good; the series is not that simple. But there are certain things Jaime wouldn't do - Book Jaime and Show Jaime - and rape is on the list.