Lifejumper
Member
Spider-man won the show. Yall know it.
Edit: top of the page, nice.
Edit: top of the page, nice.
There's a war?
Yeah, the arbitrary cut-off is an inherent bias, IMO. Zelda's stats on Twitter dwarfed everything else, I can't imagine the same thing didn't happen on Facebook.
I'm not being facetious, but I'm surprised by this as I'd not seen any conversation or discussion on Sony's conference. Did they announce anything?
pretty much sell believe is better than concrete stuff
to me it's sad.
sure i'm not common people
What would be the point of 90% of the games all being games we already know are coming this year?pretty much sell believe is better than concrete stuff
to me it's sad.
sure i'm not common people
For real though, the data is very interesting and obviously the companies care about it greatly, but reporting it as a "war" is a boring, tired attempt at hype.
"This is a very powerful storytelling tool for the publishers, he said.
Olebe said the data gives game companies a heat map for whats hot in gaming in real time.
Next E3, everyone will just release trailers on Snapchat
Bigger isn't always better. While Facebook is by far the largest social media platform with over 5 times the daily users Twitter boasts, that huge audience can also prove less relevant among certain demographics. Gaming is a good example of that as Twitter's base tends to skew younger, wealthier, more racially diverse, more likely to follow current news and more engaged in technology fields (like gaming). It's almost similar to something like Wii casuals versus PS/Xbox core, demographics can make the smaller userbase more relevant in certain respects.That's a bad comparison. With politics you're introducing the needed step of voting. With E3 conference comparisons, it's all about buzz and opinions.
Considering Facebook is the largest social network, it is the best metric for looking at this.
Source was here: https://twitter.com/icotomBethesda talked about Doom and Fallout 4 VR support, how can their ratio be 0?
Microsoft, Nintendo & Sony? They spend a fortune on these shows, in part, for this exact reason.
There's a war?
Guys I need help with this one.Microsoft was the best. Also what Nintendo showed of Zelda Breath of the Wild is more interesting than Sony entire E3 lineup. I'm a Sony fan and it doesn't make sense to me how they "won".
I'm annoyed tbh. It's annoying that Activision has this franchise. IMO Sony made a dumb decision here. I would have done to them what Marvel is doing with Xmen, let that franchise have 0 hype and then buy at some point when Activision raises their hands and admits it has no value. Sony will just raise its value and they will take it back again to ruin it like they did last time. Awful.
No it's just that the pacing and pretty much everything was perfect.Yeah, probably because the orchestra.
whatThe most-discussed games after the press conferences were The Elder Scrolls: Legends
By contrast, the most talked-about games in the week leading up to E3 were The Elder Scrolls: Legends
Wow a double shutdown play of the game. We need the music added.
Lmao i can just hear the PotG sound playing.
Guys I need help with this one.
Microsoft was the best. Also what Nintendo showed of Zelda Breath of the Wild is more interesting than Sony entire E3 lineup. I'm a Sony fan and it doesn't make sense to me how they "won".
Bigger isn't always better. While Facebook is by far the largest social media platform with over 5 times the daily users Twitter boasts, that huge audience can also prove less relevant among certain demographics. Gaming is a good example of that as Twitter's base tends to skew younger, wealthier, more racially diverse, more likely to follow current news and more engaged in technology fields (like gaming). It's almost similar to something like Wii casuals versus PS/Xbox core, demographics can make the smaller userbase more relevant in certain respects.
Excellent postSony resonated with people because a lot of people watch E3 to get a peek at what's coming in the future. They watch E3 for the surprises and spectacle. Sony gave us surprises and showed us actual gameplay, and that gets people excited. The dates do not matter for a lot of people.
They showed a new God of War going into a completely different direction. We got a date for The Last Guardian, confirming that that game is indeed finally coming out. They showed Resident Evil 7, also a game going in a new direction compared to its predecessor. We got VR games. We got a demo for Infinite Warfare that surprised / blew away a lot of people after the initial negativity. They had Kojima on stage showing his new project. It does not matter that Kojima's project is still a long way off; the point is that he is back and that he is doing something new, something unique, something he wants to do.
These are exciting things; big franchises going in new directions, a highly anticipated game finally getting a date, them showing confidence in VR, turning around public perception on an initially disliked game, a great creator showing of his new project after all of the shit he went through. Add to that excellent gameplay slices from stuff like Horizon and Detroit and a high-profile Spiderman game announcement, and I just find it hard to understand how you can't understand that people are excited for this stuff.
I have no issue with you personally not liking it, but I don't really get why you don't 'get' why this resonated so well with others.