Uh, no I didn't. I was just telling you that you are already starting from a point that isn't conductive to constructive speculation. You are basically saying "Well if MS upped their game, then Sony also put in 8gb of GDDr5".
Which you know, doesn't make sense. Because MS didn't put in 8 GB of Gddr5 in Durango just because Sony put 4 GB of GDDr5.
What I mean with that, and I'll explain it to you, is that it isn't a rule that if one company tries to do something with its hardware that then the other company is simply gonna react and offer something that is doubly better.
It's not realistic.
And you accuse me of putting words into your mouth when in fact you did that to me (see above).
No I didn't, I actually critiqued exactly what you said. You are criticizing me for something I didn't say.
I'll just end this farcical argument with you on this note;
COOL COOL COOL!
I don't see how making the last sentence seem as it was written by a 12 year old helps your argument at all.
Fact is, Sony upped their specs mid 2012. No such information regarding Durango, and the target specs are from february 2012.
But since Ilherre said the target specs haven't changed, I too believe that they didn't change. At least anything major.
I do agree though, let's end this argument because it's clear that your intentions are just to basically throw tomatoes at me trying to make something stick.
I've no desire of pursuing this conversation with you.
It's not just the ram though. Double the ROPs and 4 additional CUs, as well as the much higher bandwidth 4gb ram.
Yeah between the memory design and the CUs and the ROPs, the difference is at least apparently much larger than what some comments would've suggested.
It's hard to see a "wash" right now between these two systems. Specially because at face value they seem to share very similar gpus at least, in terms of architecture.
)
