Prithee Be Careful
Industry Professional
Remind me not to hire you to ever write any elevator pitches, if you think "caveats" and "exceptions" that only affect niche users, belong in one.
Man, you'd laugh if you knew what I did for a living...
Remind me not to hire you to ever write any elevator pitches, if you think "caveats" and "exceptions" that only affect niche users, belong in one.
I'm not a fan of this news for purely personal reasons. I don't like playing handhelds and would really prefer all games to be playable in docked mode. I wouldn't have a problem with this if it was just touch games or something, but I'm afraid devs will arbitrarily do this in the future. Or even worse, insert bullshit touch mechanics in a game just so they can make it handheld-only.
Yes please!I'll throw my hat in for a Colors! version for Switch.
Same. I thought the point of the Switch was that you could 'switch' from traditional TV gaming to mobile, full-quality gaming, on the fly (and vice versa)? Allowing mobile only games seems like a terrible strategy.Not liking this news. Makes sense for 1-2 Switch which requires the joycons, but Tabletop Mode in that case is still essentially portable mode. This may be good news for "AAA" titles to take full advantage of docked performance, but a Switch game, imo, shouldn't be sacrificing between two main methods of playing them. That just feels like it defeats the purpose of this concept.
Same. I thought the point of the Switch was that you could 'switch' from traditional TV gaming to mobile, full-quality gaming, on the fly (and vice versa)? Allowing mobile only games seems like a terrible strategy.
Let's say a AAA game does this? How will they denote this? "Only works in Switch [mobile/portable/tablet] mode" disclosed on the back of the box?
Seems messy.
Well, there it is. Good that they prepared for this.http://nintendotoday.com/switch-game-case-play-mode/
They already have a section on the back of the box for this.
Just realised, this means a Lady Layton port, likely hand held only, could work with very little effort (a port of the iPhone/android release)!
Why will a developer deliberately want to make their game handheld-only, barring any technical reason that we are having here?
I don't know. Hopefully it never happens. I can imagine scenarios where a Japanese dev decides it would be easier/cheaper to solely target the handheld mode and not have to worry about 1080p assets/testing for docked mode. Besides, 90% of their Japanese audience plays the system in handheld mode most of the time since Japan is all about the portable play.
So, Switch is a tablet now? Can it get Netflix, YouTube and a browser, then?
Why will a developer deliberately want to make their game handheld-only, barring any technical reason that we are having here?
I love these little Jimmy hypotheticals on this board which are more projections of the user's thoughts than any actual real person's. No, I think they'll figure it out alright
Lower res assets, less testing, cheaper development all together.
They're still making an HD game. They have no reason to not make it available on the docked mode too.
I'm surprised that Nintendo doesn't have a solution for the Right Joycon IR camera to interact with TV screen in a semi-touch fashion.
You're assuming they make HD assets.
They're still making an HD game. They have no reason to not make it available on the docked mode too.
I honestly didn't think Nintendo would allow this. Huh. Still, I expect such games to be quite rare.
Uh oh.
Game Freak just sat up and took notice.
Not surprised after hearing VOEZ announced. Time for all the mobile game ports! I'm hoping for Cytus 2.
Nintendo would not allow a Pokemon game which can't be played docked.
Why are some people nervous about this?? If that's how a game is designed to play, why not? There were DS and Wii U games that were touch-screen only, I always expected this.
Nintendo wouldn't allow a 3DS Pokémon game that can't be played in 3D.
Oh wait...
Why are some people nervous about this?? If that's how a game is designed to play, why not? There were DS and Wii U games that were touch-screen only, I always expected this.
Nintendo wouldn't allow a 3DS Pokémon game that can't be played in 3D.
And they could do all of that and have the games still work in TV mode. I mean, that was known since the Eurogamer leak showed devs could opt for handheld mode clocks even in TV mode.Lower res assets, less testing, cheaper development all together.
Why are some people nervous about this?? If that's how a game is designed to play, why not? There were DS and Wii U games that were touch-screen only, I always expected this.
Would probably require the game to NEED the higher clocks, and I doubt Nintendo will go for that. It's one thing for a bit of extra functionality for gameplay, it's another for a bit of performance leeway.This is a good thing, but I think it will only apply to small, touch only games. I doubt many, if any, games are made to work on TV mode only.
People on here freak out all the time about the smallest things. It's nothing new. I'm sure aside from straight mobile ports, and those which make heavy use of the touch screen, there won't be too many portable only titles.
And they could do all of that and have the games still work in TV mode. I mean, that was known since the Eurogamer leak showed devs could opt for handheld mode clocks even in TV mode.
this is how you know this is a handheld what (often) connects to a tv first, and not a shit console that you can take with you, like others claimed.
Imagine this conversation:
"This is a switch game but its handheld only"
"Then why is it called switch? What am i switching to?"
This is the pandoras box nintendo has opened with this. How can they separate games that dont work one way?
Its not an overreaction at all.
And I love snarky remarks that seek to invalidate real opinions or concerns from "real persons," as if they were drawn up from a computer.
I mean, I can't imagine that the TV support is all that intensive to add either. Who on earth wants their game to be portable only and lock themselves out of the main feature of the console if it has the capability to display on a TV?
What if Nintendo releases a handheld-only Switch after the 3DS is phased out?Your point makes no sense. Nintendo released a 3DS without the 3D. They don't care.
What if Nintendo releases a handheld-only Switch after the 3DS is phased out?
Nintendo wouldn't allow a game that shows nothing at all on the Gamepad.
What if Nintendo releases a handheld-only Switch after the 3DS is phased out?
Calling it, when/if Mario Maker gets a port or a sequel on Switch, they'll set it up so you can play stages in all modes, but you'll have to use handheld mode only when designing courses with the touchscreen.