Indeed, Ubisoft are pretty damn loose with their quality control as it is. I wouldn't be surprised if this is truly broken on PS360.No and you don't want to.
Indeed, Ubisoft are pretty damn loose with their quality control as it is. I wouldn't be surprised if this is truly broken on PS360.No and you don't want to.
We pc gamers have been living the good life for a while, running console current gen games at higher res and framerates with affordable rigs. I think things are going to change :/
Destiny's not announced for PC, and TitanFall is a Source game. I can't imagine those specs are going to blow your hair back.I'll wait until Destiny/Titanfall ultra specs are released before my long awaited game pc build.
64 bit ONLY?
FUCK YEAH!
That's all fake though.
Out of everything, thats the first thing that popped up in my eyes
Now if only Dx9 were die off quicker, I'd be sooo happy.
That's all fake though.
I would need to upgrade most of my PC to play next-gen games at a decent performance... a new GPU, a new CPU, more RAM a better power supply to manage all this... Ugh... Stuff like this makes me want to buy a PS4 instead.
Indeed, Ubisoft are pretty damn loose with their quality control as it is. I wouldn't be surprised if this is truly broken on PS360.
Sounds like a lazy port if it needs that as minimum, oh, ubisoft you say?
Sounds horribly unoptimized if it requires 8 cores/threads for the better graphics settings considering how weak the PS4 and Xbone processors are. You'd think an I5 overclocked to 4.5 ghz should be enough to max out any game short of crazy resolution triple monitor setups.
Normally an Intel quad core CPU beats an AMD 8-core ... They're cheap and they're crap. Sorry AMD fans.
Just a guess but the "recommended" and "ultra" spec should run the game muuuuuuuuch better than the PS4/X1 version.
Might be brutal, I had a Q8300 and I could barely play Arkham City.
In most games, it matters not http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2274887
But it all depends how the game is coded. Even AMD's Vishera and Zambezi '8-core' CPUs are really 4 modules that each have two weak integer pipelines in them.
Sounds horribly unoptimized
Normally an Intel quad core CPU beats an AMD 8-core ... They're cheap and they're crap. Sorry AMD fans.
Good, my insane rig can finally be asked to work a little.
Really? AA/AC run 40-60fps maxed for me bro
I just built a 660ti/3570k computer last October and I'm already feeling inferior.
Because they've been designing this game from the ground up for 8 cores due to PS4/XB1.
I'm bout dat next gen life
Do I really need more than 8gb of RAM at this point though?
lolYou guys don't get it!
It's four cores for the game and other four cores for uPlay.
That's all fake though.
Hmmph. I still think of Hyper-Threading as it was in the Pentium4 era.
My rig is only just a year old, but I'm feeling kinda squeemish about my gtx680 "only" havng 2gigs of vram.