Solidsoul
Banned
Was just curious what were some notable changes Peter Jackson made to LOTR in the films that were different in the book from people who have read and watched both?
I know it's tempting to say "EVERYTHING IN THE BOOK WAS BETTER" but I'd like to try and be objective. You can throw out things from The Hobbit as well but due to the overwhelming negativity about those films in here I'm sure we won't see much of that.
Personally I kinda feel like the stuff with Saruman attacking the Shire after the ring has already been destroyed kinda makes for a very disjointed weird way to close out the trilogy, I feel it would have been better to do it earlier or not at all (much like the films).
What improvements or changes do you feel we're made in the film adaptations?
I've heard the negatives countless times, only interested in the pro's.
I know it's tempting to say "EVERYTHING IN THE BOOK WAS BETTER" but I'd like to try and be objective. You can throw out things from The Hobbit as well but due to the overwhelming negativity about those films in here I'm sure we won't see much of that.
Personally I kinda feel like the stuff with Saruman attacking the Shire after the ring has already been destroyed kinda makes for a very disjointed weird way to close out the trilogy, I feel it would have been better to do it earlier or not at all (much like the films).
What improvements or changes do you feel we're made in the film adaptations?
I've heard the negatives countless times, only interested in the pro's.