But I would argue that last gen X360 was not specifically a lesser option. It was a different console and different ecosystem but not the lesser option. Yet it was not able to crack that market. I am wondering if it is a marketing issue or is it an issue of services?
See this is what I dont get. Content wise nothing about Xbox one is inherently more American than Playstation. Both get all the shooters ( if that is what is considered more popular in the states) or atleast most of them. The fact that this myth is still carrying on implies that it is a marketing issue and not a content issue.
Point noted and respected - maybe my OP wasn't worded correctly - im basing my opinion on my experiences, that so many people I speak to/see discussing on FB etc dont appear to be able to do this!
I think the main factor is the 'console war' attitude that many gamers seem to have (particularly here in the UK, where social levels and IQ's are dropping rapidly) means that the vast majority buy the 'most powerful' console - i.e PS4.
I think people are far too caught up in the whole resolution/framerate affairs, negating the fact they should buy a console based on the games and features that appeal to them.
At the end of the day, in my opinion, there is very little difference between the 2 for general gaming (which I consider an hour or so a night at most), so the 2/3 exclusive titles on either side could be the deciding factor for some -
as I said, it was pretty much Forza that swayed it for as ive been a fan of the series since the start. (not to mention looks, UI, controller, manufacturer loyaltyetc)
In fairness a lot of my fellow Brits really are fucking morons.
Of course I'd say that's a massive factor in why the XO is doing much better here than in the rest of the world, despite all it's American centric features not working any better here than on the mainland, but still, he isn't wrong about that how many of us are really dumb fuckers.
I think that the average age of console gamer in the UK is 30-something, and has been playing games for a while. It's probably best to avoid assigning sweeping motives to them for buying one console or another when they probably have a pretty decent idea of what they want.
This is actually a pretty embarassing thing to type in all honesty.
How do you know they don't do this?
I'd have thought the PS4 having a dramatically larger game library available overall would count for a lot more than "2-3 games". I can recall reading on here last week that there's currently something like a hundred games on the PS4 store that aren't available on Xbox One.
This post is going to be loaded with my own assumptions. I am going to make generalizations about Europeans, and I am going to be talking completely from my ass. I know very few Europeans, and have no basis for my opinions. The PS4 is beating the X1 in European markets simply because:
#1 The unveiling. At the unveiling of the X1 we were treated to lots and lots of TV. American TV. Guy instantly switching back and forth between Fantasy Football, and the Price is Right. I can't imagine Europeans being impressed with this.
#2 The NFL tie ins. Europeans love Football. Too bad that doesn't include American Football. Another miss.
#3 Price. Europeans don't like to pay more for something when they can get something else a good bit cheaper.
#4 Power. This one is debatable, but at the time of the X1 and PS4 release, the PS4 was rumored to be much more powerful. Europeans love shit that's more powerful than other shit.
#5 Perceptions. Hearts and minds. For the longest time Europeans saw the X1 as the bad guy. MS was the big bad corporation. Sony just wanted to make games and bring them happiness. The way Sony positioned themselves with regards to DRM went a long way convincing Europeans that MS was the devil.
#6 Size. The X1 is just huge. I go to IKEA and I see brilliantly designed, space saving products, at a fair price. Europeans don't have room for that behemoth in their tiny living rooms.
#7 Avaliability. A huge chunk of Europe couldn't get their hands on an X1 because it only launched in 13 countries. Many European countries were excluded. Sure. They could hop on their Vespa and ride 150 miles to the nearest country that did have X1s but why do that when you can get a cheaper, more powerful, and available PS4 right down the street!
#8 Design. Europeans love innovative, unique design. The PS4 and it's slick Parallelepiped shape, is worlds better than the power brick and block design of the X1.
#9 Install Base. I could be wrong but I think the PS3 was already the leader in Europe. It just makes sense that if someone was happy with a product, they would stick with it. It's the same with the 360 in America.
#10 RROD. Before the X1 was released, we had to take MS word that the RROD problems that dogged the first 360s would not happen this gen. Europeans have long memories, and it's not inconceivable that they would cast a skeptical eye on the first batches of X1s.
As an European, most of your assumptions are wrong.
You seem to see us Europeans as a different species....
Why would anybody care about the size of a gaming device, especially if it's able to replace a set-top box.
Such as?
Off the top of my head, Kinect not working properly with a lot of regional accents, lack of support for Welsh/Gaelic, HDMI pass through is useless for most people as the overwhelming majority use their TV's built in Freeview, and even if you do have Cable or Satellite the 50hz/60hz incompatibility causes stuttering, the Gridiron bollocks which no one outside the US really gives a shite about, and general media functionality and app support being worse at launch than the PS4 (which it may still be. Do they have BBC iPlayer yet?).
Why should people go for the lesser option? It's really that straight forward.
The X360 did Well in Europe because it earned that success but the XB1 is a screw up.
Even some Americans complain about Kinect, not a European-only problem.
The TV Tuner is out now in several European countries.
The 50hz issue was addressed a while back in the March 2014 update.
European NFL fans are thin on the ground, but I know quite a few here in the UK and the games at Wembley sell-out each time, so it has its fans. Regardless, the feature works here and apps that don't tend to be a reflection of the service. Pandora for example, is a service that you can't use unless based in the States.
BBC iPlayer came out in December.
Something else that isn't just cheaper but also better.#3 Price. Europeans don't like to pay more for something when they can get something else a good bit cheaper.
It's not debatable. PS4 is more powerful.#4 Power. This one is debatable, but at the time of the X1 and PS4 release, the PS4 was rumored to be much more powerful.
Why use past tense? Microsoft hasn't changed the way it conducts business, treats the privacy of its customers or how it cooperates with the NSA.#5 Perceptions. Hearts and minds. For the longest time Europeans saw the X1 as the bad guy. MS was the big bad corporation.
Actually, even in those lowly Vespa-riding tier 2 countries Xbone was readily available soon after its tier 1 launch, as retail chains shipped their surplus inventory around (because tier 1 consumers weren't all that interested in Xbone, either).#7 Avaliability. A huge chunk of Europe couldn't get their hands on an X1 because it only launched in 13 countries. Many European countries were excluded. Sure. They could hop on their Vespa and ride 150 miles to the nearest country that did have X1s but why do that when you can get a cheaper, more powerful, and available PS4 right down the street!
Fair enough.talking completely from my ass.
So voice recognition is still shite, Gridiron is still only enjoyed by a few weirdos who should be fucking ashamed of themselves, a TV tuner gives added functionality but is also an additional cost and extra external component, but at least the stuttering is fixed and it's no better or worse than the PS4 with streaming apps?
Why it's like it was custom made for the British!
Because Microsoft thinks Europe is a country.
Kinect works for some people, doesn't for others from what I've seen, not something you can label shite unless you've done the research and have the true numbers. Works for me and my wife, so I'm happy.
As for your Gridiron comment...the only weirdo who should be ashamed, is your ignorant self for making such an immature comment in the first place.
The system's performance and game library aren't mutually exclusive, they both matter when a purchase decision is being made, like Nielsen's survey showed.
A few of my friends have strong Welsh, Scottish or Northern accents, and, having tried the XO's Kinect at a a party last year, must have had at best a 10% success rate. For a feature the entire system was built around, anything less than perfect for everyone in the regions it's releasing in is a failure on a conceptual level.
Either way, the system is clearly not designed for Britain anymore than it is the mainland. The XO is an American product through and through, and no amount of software patching or add on releases is going to change that fundamental flaw.
And my taking the piss out of gridiron fans is mostly for comedic effect. Saying that, it's still a dumbed down, slower version of rugby where the plays are such wimps they have to wear padding, and I'm never not going to hold either the game or it's fans in a small amount of contempt. Still, at least it's not golf!
Average European is a smarter consumer than average American. Edit: For clarification I'm not saying Americans are daft, just that they live in a much larger consumption society.
General consensus is that PS4 is the better machine.
Strategic in terms of having more control over the IP's and development. Why wouldn't Scalebound and Phantom Dust be just as risk & reward as Lost Odyssey and Blue Dragon?I wouldn't say strategic at all MS is just being careful they don't even feel Japan is a market to put too much into. Strategic would mean taking a risk such as Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey, critically acclaimed MS exclusives. Those are risks that had great reward.
Crimson Dragon: Horrble Panzer Subsitute.
D4: Excellent game now getting the exposure it deserves thanks it GwG.
Spellbound: Looks excellent but it's a trailer with no gameplay.
Phantom Dust: Studio has been shut down and project cancelled. But may still be in development. These are not Strategic? MS has stepped it up with indies as seen at GDC.
Dragon Quest is coming west because the fans wanted it and Square is aware of the PS4 base.
PS4 alone has Dragon Quest Heroes,Ys,Toukiden,Persona,and Disgaea.... This doesn't even include multiple others announced at TGS.
I might be late with this post, but I think it's important to note that the first FF to ever release in Europe was FFVII so people clearly associate FF with PlayStation over here. In fact, the first official releases of the NES and SNES titles (except FFIII) in Europe were the PS1 ports.
Initially I associated Squaresoft with the SNES/GameBoy only due to Secret of Mana and its GB prequel, Mystic Quest, which was badged as an FF title here on release. The UK games mags really liked SoM (particularly Super Play who championed all kinds of Japanese imports, particularly Squaresoft's stuff) and it introduced a lot of gamers here to JRPG-style concepts, like flying around a world map, looking for secrets etc. FFVII and the huge popularity of the PSOne was really where JRPGs took off here though. It's a bit like how motion controls existed already, but it took the Wii to really push them front-and-centre. It's absolutely why FF will always be associated with Playstation in some people's minds, a decade of exclusivity including when a series is at it's most popular will do that.Ah, that had not occurred to me at all. Growing up in Indonesia despite being a US citizen during that period gave me the impression that Europe also had access to FF6 on the SNES.
While I agree with some of your points, others just dont make any sense.This post is going to be loaded with my own assumptions. I am going to make generalizations about Europeans, and I am going to be talking completely from my ass. I know very few Europeans, and have no basis for my opinions. The PS4 is beating the X1 in European markets simply because:
#1 The unveiling. At the unveiling of the X1 we were treated to lots and lots of TV. American TV. Guy instantly switching back and forth between Fantasy Football, and the Price is Right. I can't imagine Europeans being impressed with this.
#2 The NFL tie ins. Europeans love Football. Too bad that doesn't include American Football. Another miss.
#3 Price. Europeans don't like to pay more for something when they can get something else a good bit cheaper.
#4 Power. This one is debatable, but at the time of the X1 and PS4 release, the PS4 was rumored to be much more powerful. Europeans love shit that's more powerful than other shit.
#5 Perceptions. Hearts and minds. For the longest time Europeans saw the X1 as the bad guy. MS was the big bad corporation. Sony just wanted to make games and bring them happiness. The way Sony positioned themselves with regards to DRM went a long way convincing Europeans that MS was the devil.
#6 Size. The X1 is just huge. I go to IKEA and I see brilliantly designed, space saving products, at a fair price. Europeans don't have room for that behemoth in their tiny living rooms.
#7 Avaliability. A huge chunk of Europe couldn't get their hands on an X1 because it only launched in 13 countries. Many European countries were excluded. Sure. They could hop on their Vespa and ride 150 miles to the nearest country that did have X1s but why do that when you can get a cheaper, more powerful, and available PS4 right down the street!
#8 Design. Europeans love innovative, unique design. The PS4 and it's slick Parallelepiped shape, is worlds better than the power brick and block design of the X1.
#9 Install Base. I could be wrong but I think the PS3 was already the leader in Europe. It just makes sense that if someone was happy with a product, they would stick with it. It's the same with the 360 in America.
#10 RROD. Before the X1 was released, we had to take MS word that the RROD problems that dogged the first 360s would not happen this gen. Europeans have long memories, and it's not inconceivable that they would cast a skeptical eye on the first batches of X1s.
Question: Are most of the serious FIFA 15 players on XBONE? I ask because in all off the YouTube tutorial vidoes that's what they are using so it seems like it.
Sony even tried to install rootkits and to change the CD standards. Yes people may go "That is Sony Music not SCEE!!!" but it still is Sony's name in the articles .
Even some Americans complain about Kinect, not a European-only problem.
The TV Tuner is out now in several European countries.
The 50hz issue was addressed a while back in the March 2014 update.
European NFL fans are thin on the ground, but I know quite a few here in the UK and the games at Wembley sell-out each time, so it has its fans. Regardless, the feature works here and apps that don't tend to be a reflection of the service. Pandora for example, is a service that you can't use unless based in the States.
BBC iPlayer came out in December.
Initially I associated Squaresoft with the SNES/GameBoy only due to Secret of Mana and its GB prequel, Mystic Quest, which was badged as an FF title here on release. The UK games mags really liked SoM (particularly Super Play who championed all kinds of Japanese imports, particularly Squaresoft's stuff) and it introduced a lot of gamers here to JRPG-style concepts, like flying around a world map, looking for secrets etc. FFVII and the huge popularity of the PSOne was really where JRPGs took off here though. It's a bit like how motion controls existed already, but it took the Wii to really push them front-and-centre. It's absolutely why FF will always be associated with Playstation in some people's minds, a decade of exclusivity including when a series is at it's most popular will do that.
Man I loved Secret of Mana. I find it hard to go back to though.
It's actually quite interesting to see that most of the PS4's selling points are directly related to gaming and for Xbone they're more or less jargon created by Microsoft PR.
I'm a big NFL fan and tbh the features aren't that great, only worthwhile as i'm a gamepass subscriber. It's a nice add on tho, but not for this market
The 50hz issue hasn't been fixed. Watching sky sports via the Xbox One is shocking. gave up on that a long time a go.
The reason why playstation does better over here is simple. the franchises, Gran Turismo, Metal Gear Solid, FF etc. People grew up with them and enjoy them so want to continue with them. Nintendo screwed EU for years so most people avoided them and went with Playstation
Sure Xbox will gain ground, but it won't be overnight and recent mess ups and treating a fair chunk of the EU poorly (just like ninty did in the day) won't help.