Bruce Springsteen
Member
TNA with Russo writing is doing the same viewers as Smackdown, around 2 million, RAW at 2.6 million is nearly there
I think more than anything, this proves how considerable wrestling has declined in viewership. There's more people with sets and cable than they did in '99. WCW was still hitting 4's in this year and MNF was huge, hitting in the mid teens. In 2000, Smackdown is on UPN/CW hitting high 4's and 5's every week, meanwhile Raw (hits 7's a handful of times that year) goes to TNN and still maintains those marks.
The percentage of viewership has drastically gone down and the fact they're nearing 2m viewers in fucking May is inexcusable. It's excuse after excuse. There is zero competition and they can buy out any wrestler, past or present, they want (until they run them out i.e. Batista and CM Punk) and yet there's these results.
Jinder = Ratings
Post PPV shows always have bumps
Give it a week.
Holy shit...ONE POINT SEVEN 5
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
Holy shit...
At what point do they start really panicking?
ONE POINT SEVEN 5
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
Holy shit...
At what point do they start really panicking?
ONE POINT SEVEN 5
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
When do they tell the writing department?Honestly I think they've been panicking behind the scenes already.
ONE POINT SEVEN 5
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
When do they tell the writing department?
I always confuse ratings and viewers.
So what's the record? Are we at TNA numbers?
As bad as RAW was, Smackdown was worse
TNA during their Spike TV days was doing 0.9-1.1 ratings. They're getting close to TNA numbers.
Meltz said only ONE episode of nitro ever did a worse rating then Monday's raw.
TNA during their Spike TV days was doing 0.9-1.1 ratings. They're getting close to TNA numbers.
ONE POINT SEVEN 5
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
You missed the Alexa Bliss segment then...As bad as RAW was, Smackdown was worse
Something else people should consider is this week's raw had a PROMOTED main event of Roman Reigns vs. Seth Rollins.
Those are their two biggest/hardest pushed babyfaces on Raw, if not the entire company. Basically the equivalent of John Cena vs. Randy Orton.
And it did a HORRIBLE third hour. What does that say about your biggest babyface stars at the moment? I struggle to think of a bigger matchup between two full time WWE wrestlers at the moment. Maybe AJ vs. Reigns? Orton vs. Reigns?
Something else people should consider is this week's raw had a PROMOTED main event of Roman Reigns vs. Seth Rollins.
Those are their two biggest/hardest pushed babyfaces on Raw, if not the entire company. Basically the equivalent of John Cena vs. Randy Orton.
And it did a HORRIBLE third hour. What does that say about your biggest babyface stars at the moment? I struggle to think of a bigger matchup between two full time WWE wrestlers at the moment. Maybe AJ vs. Reigns? Orton vs. Reigns?
damn that segment was bad.ONE POINT SEVEN 5
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
I doubt they're panicking that much if their revenue is up. WWE has become a merchandise and licensing business over the years.
Did he say which episode of Nitro it was? I would like to check it out.
As bad as RAW was, Smackdown was worse
I doubt they're panicking that much if their revenue is up. WWE has become a merchandise and licensing business over the years.
Meltz also is starting to take seriously the idea that Raw might not get renewed by USA (if their program head changes, the current one is a friend of Vince's so unlikely).
It's really getting to the point where it may not be logical for USA from a purely financial point of view.
If USA does not renew them, what happens? Do they go network exclusive programming?
Meltz also is starting to take seriously the idea that Raw might not get renewed by USA (if their program head changes, the current one is a friend of Vince's so unlikely).
If USA does not renew them, what happens? Do they go network exclusive programming?
With Raw ratings in the toilet why would a network give the WWE something to make live Raw even less attractive?Whatever new tv deal they make in the future better not be one where you gotta wait too long for a RAW episode to get on the wwe network. At worst it needs to be on the network immediately after it airs.
The scenario would probably be USA not wanting to renew at the price the WWE wants, leading to the WWE shopping itself around. WWE's programming is far less valuable than when they signed their last batch of TV contracts.Isn't still the highest rated show on USA? Why wouldn't they renew?
Whatever new tv deal they make in the future better not be one where you gotta wait too long for a RAW episode to get on the wwe network. At worst it needs to be on the network immediately after it airs.
Isn't still the highest rated show on USA? Why wouldn't they renew?
Isn't still the highest rated show on USA? Why wouldn't they renew?
They have to find another network to take them. Likely with a much smaller deal.
With Raw ratings in the toilet why would a network give the WWE something to make live Raw even less attractive?
I wonder how many people just watch the stream online.
Man, imagine if TNA was run by a competent owner all these years?
What choice would a network have? Cord cutting is only going to be a bigger thing in the future. If anything networks would start needing Vince a lot more than he would need them. I would assume he would eventually have all the bargaining chips.
Besides I'm not saying it should be live. But the way it is now with the long ass wait is unacceptable.
No, it wasn't.