Mr. Enigma
Member
6v6 used to be perfect for Call of Duty around the CoD4/WaW days, but they keep making the maps smaller and smaller to the point where 6v6 now feels like a huge clusterfuck.
Call of Duty is not Battlefield. I think anything more than 4v4 in CoD is a clusterfuck
so 64 players for xbox one BF4.
19 for COD.....
am i getting this correct ?
lol if that is the case, i don't know what to say. i just hope BF4 sell more this year. not because i hate COD, its because i want the developers to wake up and stop releasing the same game under different skins.
so 64 players for xbox one BF4.
19 for COD.....
am i getting this correct ?
lol if that is the case, i don't know what to say. i just hope BF4 sell more this year. not because i hate COD, its because i want the developers to wake up and stop releasing the same game under different skins.
Same, probably. It's not a technological limitation or anything.
CoD is not Battlefield, and it doesn't want to be.
so 64 players for xbox one BF4.
19 for COD.....
am i getting this correct ?
lol if that is the case, i don't know what to say. i just hope BF4 sell more this year. not because i hate COD, its because i want the developers to wake up and stop releasing the same game under different skins.
What does the number of players per team for a multiplayer shooter have to do with the quality of said title? Big team battle for Halo always sucked compared to the 4v4 matches.
Damn, this game is printed already.
Then the thread title should be updated so as not to incite fanboy comments. Makes it sound like it will be more players on other platforms.
I wonder how many games actually are done then after seeing this. This straight skipped a gold announcement and showed the finished product.
I wonder if devs are all working on day one updates at this point with physical copies being pressed and ready to go.
Why do people keep comparing this? Not the same type of games at all. Personally i enjoy COD way more than BF, only BF i liked was Bad Company.
2 campers, 2 snipers, 3 noobs on the edges of the map and 2 people playing the objective. Sounds about right.
Switch 1 noob with 1 asshole running around knifing everyone.
I'm not a CoD player, but this seems like par for the course. PC/PS4 should have the same player count, too. Are people up in arms over this?Ground War in Call of Duty 4: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: World at War: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Black Ops: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Black Ops 2: 18 Players
2 campers, 2 snipers, 3 noobs on the edges of the map and 2 people playing the objective. Sounds about right.
so did i . but why not give players more options ? some people want small games. just like how everyone loves nuke town type of levels.
but others also enjoy more players in big levels. so why not giving them the option to in a new game mode ?
i mean, BF does it. why not COD ?
Your ability to misjudge the general mood of threads is amazing.
Am I suppose to be shocked?
Isn't this the regular player count for CoD? They can't just throw a bunch more players into a small map on next gen, that would be a horrible experience.
No, the OP was just a little confused.Grimløck;86397529 said:I'm not a CoD player, but this seems like par for the course. Are people up in arms over this?
so 64 players for xbox one BF4.
19 for COD.....
am i getting this correct ?
lol if that is the case, i don't know what to say. i just hope BF4 sell more this year. not because i hate COD, its because i want the developers to wake up and stop releasing the same game under different skins.
2 campers, 2 snipers, 3 noobs on the edges of the map and 2 people playing the objective. Sounds about right.
It's possible that particular disc wasn't 100% real.
However, now is about the time most games are finished, and then they have to pass certification for each console, so they have a few weeks to print and ship copies of the game.
So it's entirely possible copies of Ghosts are being made right now, but it's also possible that was just a placeholder disc for showing it off now.
Ground War in Call of Duty 4: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: World at War: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Black Ops: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: 18 Players
Ground War in Call of Duty: Black Ops 2: 18 Players
Um....precedence has been set for this kind of thing. But hey if you want an even bigger clusterfuck just because hurrrr next gen shud hav moar playrs pls then maybe you should take to twitter or something. Start a petition even, believe in yourself and you can succeed gaming pals
It's possible that particular disc wasn't 100% real.
so 64 players for xbox one BF4.
19 for COD.....
6v6 used to be perfect for Call of Duty around the CoD4/WaW days, but they keep making the maps smaller and smaller to the point where 6v6 now feels like a huge clusterfuck.
"Only" 18 players?
I'm guessing the OP has skipped the last seven years worth of COD games.
Kind of. Thread title is a bit sensational then people that dont know about cod post because warsGrimløck;86397529 said:I'm not a CoD player, but this seems like par for the course. PC/PS4 should have the same player count, too. Are people up in arms over this?
Apples and oranges, really. They're almost completely different games. CoD is more run-and-gun with chaotic gameplay on smaller map sizes. Not to mention unstoppable kill-streak machines of death flying overheard. Larger maps wouldn't be suited for infantry focused gameplay, and more players would ruin the experience.
Battlefield is more about combined arms warfare (infantry + vehicles) with more emphasis on team cooperation, as well as strategy in how you attack\defend points. Larger maps make it more fun. More players are needed to fill the larger maps.