UnderWaterTree
Member
No one is going to buy it at that price it needs to be at least $100
Nope the shape chip is in the console.Kinect does voice processing on board.
No one is going to buy it at that price it needs to be at least $100
I seriously doubt people are going to see more value in the Kinect bundle than saving $160 with the Madden or SO bundle.
$150 isn't bad if it's comes with a new retail game. I wonder if Fantasia will be bundled with it. That would make sense to me.
Why is there cling film around it.I assume this will happen again
There weren't enough people who thought the Kinect was even worth $100. Since the bundle is no longer mandatory, most games won't utilize it much anyway. Nor has MS proved it's worth in actual gameplay--I hear far more praise for it's use in navigating the OS.
A 50% premium doesn't address why people who skipped on one the first time would buy it after the fact, or why people considering an Xbox One (like me) wouldn't just buy the $400 Kinectless version anyway. MS's empty boilerplate about still being committed to the Kinect doesn't give me much confidence on that score.
PS Camera is like $60 , what exactly can the Kinect do better than the Playstation Camera in?
Nope the shape chip is in the console.
There weren't enough people who thought the Kinect was even worth $100. Since the bundle is no longer mandatory, most games won't utilize it much anyway. Nor has MS proved it's worth in actual gameplay--I hear far more praise for it's use in navigating the OS.
A 50% premium doesn't address why people who skipped on one the first time would buy it after the fact, or why people considering an Xbox One (like me) wouldn't just buy the $400 Kinectless version anyway. MS's empty boilerplate about still being committed to the Kinect doesn't give me much confidence on that score.
Is that what I said?... No, it wasn't.
I personally think the Kinect bundle should be much cheaper than it is. But as things are now, if the Kinect was selling for $100 standalone, then you'd be able to buy an Xbox with Madden or Sunset Overdrive, and then later pick up a Kinect separately, and come out paying the exact same amount as the Kinect bundle without a game.
So how are those two bundles indicating that the standalone Kinect being cheaper makes sense (which is what the previous poster was claiming)?
What this pricing tells me is that very few Kinect centered games will be made going forward. Just think about it. First developing a Kinect game means you are tied to the XB1 console which is selling considerably less than the PS4, your other option to develop for. On top of that you can't even target the entire XB1 consumer base because the Kinect isn't included with every console and it is prohibitively expensive to add it on after the fact.
You have one?Love that price. The less this piece of shit sells, the better.
Why are people surprised and disappointed? lol
150$ sounds reasonably for buying it stand alone, could have been 130$ but 150$ makes them more flexible in pricing during deals.
People who are hating on this, are definitely the once who have never used it.
I would think the launch of a standalone unit would drive the price down, not up. I remember some selling on Ebay to people who were trying to "hack" them at one point.
Microsoft is planning to sell the stand-alone Kinect sensor for $149 beginning on or around October 6.
...because they haven't cut the price on the Kinect bundle. MS is still charging $500 for it, so they think the device is still worth at least $100--which I agree is a rather strange notion, given how things have actually played out in terms of sales. A high premium on the standalone unit isn't going to make the Kinect itself any more attractive in light of that.
Basically the Kinect bundle would have to come down in price
That 49$ extra is not gonna help, M$.
Since they use something different then USB you can't just connect an normal Kinect 2 to your pc.
How about people, who already have one from their Xbone?
How about just releasing a cheap adapter instead of trying to get every cent of it?
The Kinect is a failure on the Bone but could have a future on pc.
But at that price people like student's won't buy one who actually could give this thing a purpose.
Shame on you, M$.
That 49$ extra is not gonna help, M$.
Since they use something different then USB you can't just connect an normal Kinect 2 to your pc.
How about people, who already have one from their Xbone?
How about just releasing a cheap adapter instead of trying to get every cent of it?
The Kinect is a failure on the Bone but could have a future on pc.
But at that price people like student's won't buy one who actually could give this thing a purpose.
Shame on you, M$.
People who are hating on this, are definitely the once who have never used it.
Yea, I understand that, why is why I said...
I don't think the Kinect bundle should be costing $500 with or without a game bundled. Hell I personally think the machine needed to around $400 with the Kinect, rather than the Kinectless SKU even existing (of course, I don't know how possible this would have been). The main thing though is for the Kinect to be cheaper on its own, the bundle has to be cheaper first.
Imagine for a moment that you could get a PS4 with Destiny for $400, or a PS4 with the camera for $460. That's what people seem to be expecting here.
...um, why do we disagree again? LOL
M$...really? lol
They're making one specifically for PC.
The original one sold like hot cakes for a marginally less price and much poorer tracking with less features.
It should've been $99. Way, way overpriced. What are you doing MS?
The original one sold like hot cakes for a marginally less price and much poorer tracking with less features. $150 isn't a great deal, but it isn't a bad deal. Pack it in with a game and it would have some value.
It also had hopes, dreams and lies though.
and games
I think that would've been the case even if they had sold it for $100, frankly. That market fragmentation and slow sales for the console are much bigger issues at this point.
The PC one includes a hub to USB and an AC adapter. It's been out since July for $199.Then explain to me why they're not releasing just an adapter to connect it to the pc and release the driver for it?
Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think it's necessary to make a Kinect 2.0 for PC and Bone separately.
Where are the differences beside the connectors?
As far as it seems it's just the price.