Kabuki Quantum Lover
Member
Does buttocks on da train actually talk like that or is it on purpose? (Genuine question)
Hiding in plain sight.
*taps nose*
Does buttocks on da train actually talk like that or is it on purpose? (Genuine question)
Well maybe he meant that they didn't give an actual live demo of it like ms did : Not entirely sure what he meant though.
Edit: Or did they show the press a private demo? I'm actually not sure on that myself.
By what basis is this? People are throwing this around but I don't think they understand that it's a non issue. The slowness is when you change channels and that it can take a second or two before you see the channel change. If you're saying "Watch ESPN" or "Watch Seinfeld", it's just going to change to that channel and you won't really care if takes a second or two.
You speak a lot of sense, man.
Sadly people will still bash it, because its Microsoft.
That GUI looks like the channel listing interface they showed at the conference with Comcast. I see nothing that implies DVR functionality. They haven't said it does DVR. Reporters have reported it doesn't do DVR. Why are you assuming it does DVR against all that? DVR isn't something the box just hands over through a passthrough. It has to actually be permitted. And using an IR blaster to get it makes the whole thing pointless if you are going back to the remote for the most used feature of cable boxes.
Sony did show live gameplay, and demonstrated the Share option by uploading the Killzone gameplay sequence online.
you won't really care if takes a second or two. .
Comments like this are everywhere and I don't understand them at all. In the past two weeks, people seem to be acting like Microsoft is some sort of punching bag that has always been bashed regardless of what they do.
I hate the delay in changing channels with my DirecTV DVR so I was impressed by the speed shown in the reveal conference. I knew it was fake after it came out that it just hooked up to your cable/satellite box as of course it's going to be limited by the speed of those--and all I've had on Comcast and DTV are pretty laggy with channel changes etc.
Voice commands are nice for when you don't know where a channel is--like me having to Google where spike was to watch the Xbox reveal. So it is a nice feature. But I'd still mind the few second lag in getting there. Especially as it's pretty rare that I want to watch something on a channel I don't have the number memorized as about all I watch live is sports. Everything else I DVR so I can skip commercials. Just a random thing like that Xbox conference a time or two a year--and really not a big deal to just go to Google and type in "What channel is Spike on DirecTV," so the Xbox TV stuff lost a lot of appeal to me when it was clear that it wouldn't work anywhere near as fast or seamlessly as what they demoed.
But people do. It's the prime reason, why voice recognition and commands haven't taken off properly in almost any technology ever.
You. Do. Not. Understand. How. It. Works.
When you plug in a cable/satellite box into a 5.1/7.1 receiver, can they eliminate the GUI or remove DVR functionality?
The Xbox One is doing a video pass through with an overlay. You will be able to see your cable/satellite box GUI at all times. The Xbox One cannot do anything to get rid of it. You can clearly see that in the video when they change channels. It is still there. There is nothing to prevent you from seeing or accessing the DVR interface as the video is piped through the Xbox One. The fact that it has an IR blaster and is already doing commands to change channels and so forth makes it stupidly trivial to add Play, Pause, Rewind, Fast Forward, Record, DVR List, etc as voice commands that send an IR command to the box. If you're holding a controller, there's no reason you can't use it to control the interface as it sends IR commands to your DVR like it's the remote. There is nothing to prevent the most basic access to your DVR. It's really a question of how integrated the experience is, not whether you'll have access to it.
Sony did show live gameplay, and demonstrated the Share option by uploading the Killzone gameplay sequence online.
I'm sure a Day 1 Firmware update will fix everything.
But really, there's just not much point to using it for that. I already have a Harmony remote so it's only two button presses to switch inputs etc. (Activities and then whatever activity I want to watch).
With this just controlling the cable/sat box via an IR blaster, it's not going to be faster or offer a better GUI etc. Voice commands are kind of nice I guess, but not really a big deal IMO.
I agree with everyone that says you kind of expect this to be the case, and most people noticed it wasn't real time.
...But then, they shouldn't have focused SO MUCH on saying "see? see how fast that was?". That part is sleazy, in my opinion. It's one thing to show the concept of what you are aiming for, it's another to highlight how fast it is when it's nothing of the sort.
But really, there's just not much point to using it for that. I already have a Harmony remote so it's only two button presses to switch inputs etc. (Activities and then whatever activity I want to watch).
With this just controlling the cable/sat box via an IR blaster, it's not going to be faster or offer a better GUI etc. Voice commands are kind of nice I guess, but not really a big deal IMO.
If it had a tuner and cable/sat card slot and could thus replace the need for a cable/sat box then I'd be a lot more interested as it would de-clutter the TV stand and wire mess some, and possibly offer better speed in changing channels, a better GUI etc. As is, I don't have much interest and can just wait and see if DTV, Tivo etc. put out a DVR with voice commands if I ever really want them.
And its impossible for them to have already uploaded beforehand? Or from another PC that uploads a video and just have the guy replay the same way as that video? In the end, we'll see the truth when actual users use them.
Does buttocks on da train actually talk like that or is it on purpose? (Genuine question)
Recording and uploading a video isn't exactly mindblowing... I think we can assume they were able to do that live.
You. Do. Not. Understand. How. It. Works.
When you plug in a cable/satellite box into a 5.1/7.1 receiver, can they eliminate the GUI or remove DVR functionality?
The Xbox One is doing a video pass through with an overlay. You will be able to see your cable/satellite box GUI at all times. The Xbox One cannot do anything to get rid of it. You can clearly see that in the video when they change channels. It is still there. There is nothing to prevent you from seeing or accessing the DVR interface as the video is piped through the Xbox One. The fact that it has an IR blaster and is already doing commands to change channels and so forth makes it stupidly trivial to add Play, Pause, Rewind, Fast Forward, Record, DVR List, etc as voice commands that send an IR command to the box. If you're holding a controller, there's no reason you can't use it to control the interface as it sends IR commands to your DVR like it's the remote. There is nothing to prevent the most basic access to your DVR. It's really a question of how integrated the experience is, not whether you'll have access to it.
Then why do they talk about how this will work for only certain providers at first and in the US only? If it's just a video passthrough, why wouldn't any box work in any country? If it's as simple as recieving video, why are there limitations?
And its impossible for them to have already uploaded beforehand? Or from another PC that uploads a video and just have the guy replay the same way as that video? In the end, we'll see the truth when actual users use them.
Then why do they talk about how this will work for only certain providers at first and in the US only? If it's just a video passthrough, why wouldn't any box work in any country? If it's as simple as recieving video, why are there limitations?
Assuming yes. But having a demo on stage isn't actual proof of anything, especially considering the fact that most demos at every e3 are "controlled" as hell.
Assuming yes. But having a demo on stage isn't actual proof of anything, especially considering the fact that most demos at every e3 are "controlled" as hell.
Because they still need guide info, IR commands to control boxes and so forth in order for it to work. Plus some interviews hinted at possible DVR integration so maybe some providers might provide a way to do things that's a bit more streamlined. There are several methods to send a command over the network to tell a box to record a show so they might be integrating that. There's a number of reasons why not every box will work all at once. It's not like nothing is being done. But even to address your question, even at its core, you could plug any box into the Xbox One, from any country and see the video output on the Xbox One and then control it with the original remote control and it will work. Heck, you'll be able to plug in a PlayStation 4 and it will work. Nothing can stop that.
Have they said the latter part of your statements? You'd think they'd say this thing will work for all boxes at a minimal level if it did. I think you are assuming they are not having the HDMI in be a controlled input.
Its almost as if MS said it was the actual box live on stage... Oh wait!It's almost like the console isn't out yet.
That's a PR nightmare to try and say that and try to explain it. It's best to keep it simple than rather try to explain all the different possible scenarios of what HDMI in means. Heck they didn't even mention HDMI in or IR Blaster at the unveiling. There is nothing they can do to stop it.
Isn't this video old? It was released right after the event. Also, I believe Wired recorded this a few months before the reveal.
Also, speaking from experience, when you show off incomplete software, you show off the build that isn't going to lock up or crash. It would be really really bad if the system performed this poorly at launch. It won't happen.
But there is something they can do. HDMI is a controllable input. They can design it to block non-whitelisted boxes or other devices.
The fact that it was still a live real demo was still impressive(GG has further confirmed this by there comments, "we were crossing our fingers in hope that it wouldnt crash on stage as there was 3 bugs still in the code.") As was Sony uploading the footage to FB. I'm just saying its obvious that Sony is farther a long with there OS and game software than MS is at this point. There stuff is more ready. There was some rumors that's supported this as well.Assuming yes. But having a demo on stage isn't actual proof of anything, especially considering the fact that most demos at every e3 are "controlled" as hell.
Yeah, let's just skip right over the love affair GAF had with the 360 for the first few years, even right through RROD as people continued to buy 4th and 5th iterations of the hardware. Let's also ignore abundant justification of the value many perceive in their XBL subscriptions here. Gloss right over picking multiplats on 360 over PS3 for minor differences in texture quality and framerate that wouldn't register to most people. This place is just wall-to-wall MS hate, always and forever!Look back at the reaction to the 360 announce. It was 'Xbox 1.5' and agreeing that next gen starts when Sony says it does. The reaction to Windows 8. 'M$'. People love to hate Microsoft.
Yeah, let's just skip right over the love affair GAF had with the 360 for the first few years, even right through RROD as people continued to buy 4th and 5th iterations of the hardware. Let's also ignore abundant justification of the value many perceive in their XBL subscriptions here. Gloss right over picking multiplats on 360 over PS3 for minor differences in texture quality and framerate that wouldn't register to most people. This place is just wall-to-wall xbox hate, always and forever!
It is almost as if the console isn't out yet...no worries.
As long as it is ironed out before release.
These people are hilarious, aren't they? It's always the next thing with these fanboys.
They just can't face up to the fact that there is something seriously wrong with the system Microsoft revealed, and that this was self-evident to 90% of neoGAF. Literally 90%, because that's the percent of people who rated the conference 5/10 or less.
And they'll always just conveniently ignore how often Sony and Nintendo caught shit for their colossal fuck ups. neoGAF is not biased; it's a den of hardcore gamers that naturally react over-the-top to ANY negative news, no matter which company it is. Right now it's Microsoft's turn, because...well...Xbox One.
That's also the percentage of people that rated a thumbs down on that Fantasia Kinect video.
Watching the reveal show again and some of the features they showed have to work as shown. Particularly the hand gestures.
It seems like he's pressing a clicker or something when switching back and forth between tv and dash but later on he says xbox go home with his hands out of his pockets and it works just as fast. The hand gestures are close to 1 to 1 as well.
But then you see the Wired video and its slow as molasses.