Don't be silly. Why would the rest of my post be meaningless if you take into account the fact that Control allegedly opted out of smart delivery? Just seems like a poor excuse at a counter argument. Of course it doesn't have the tag because they couldn't do it.Xbox doesn't force all publishers to use Smart Delivery and Control opted to not use it. You will notice its got no Smart delivery tag anywhere on any of the branding. Therefore it is irrelevant to this discussion.
The rest of your post becomes meaningless when you take that fact into account.
Why would the Avengers developer not automate pressing a migrate button?
Why do you think Remedy "opted out" in Control. What technical feat do you think "smart delivery" is exactly? They didn't opt out, they simply couldn't do it without a lot of work and what people seem to think "Smart Delivery" is doesn't help:
Save games unfortunately do not transfer over from previous gen to next-gen. The version of our engine in the next-gen Control is way different to the version used in the previous gen Control. Long story short, lot of changes in things like how we handle data etc.
The Smart delivery tag is essentially marketing like certification mixed with past gen infrastructure. My point is that there isn't something that Sony can easily do now or needs to add to the PS5 that would allow this migration. It's based entirely on how the game used past gen infrastructure and the game/publisher.
Saying that pressing a migrate button is some next gen feature to be added to PS5 or some lack of software prowess that they haven't mastered yet is failing to see the issue. They can't fix this, it's legacy and legal that are the issue with specific games and if the issue isn't there with some games and it migrates without user input just fine they don't have a marketing term or tag to stick on the box for it.
Last edited: