• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

YouTube blocks non-profit's channel for not enabling ads

Xisiqomelir

Member
Don't Be Evil

Last night we received a contract from Google. You can read it here. It’s six pages of legal talk, but the gist of the agreement appears to be about Blender Foundation accepting to monetize content on its Youtube channel.
However, BF already has an ad-free Youtube account since 2008. We have monetizing disabled, but it looks like Google is going to change this policy. For example, we now see a new section on our channel settings page: “Monetization enabled”.
Now there’s another issue. Last year we were notified by US Youtube visitors that a very popular Blender Conference talk wasn’t visible for them – the talk Andrew Price gave in 2016; The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Artists. It had over a million views already.
With our channel reaching > 100k subscribers, we have special priority support. So we contacted them to ask what was wrong. After a couple of mails back and forth, the reply was as follows (22 dec 2017):

"Thanks for your continued support and patience.
I’ve received an update from our experts stating that you need to enable ads for your video. Once you enable, your video will be available in the USA.
If there’s anything else you’d need help with, please feel free to write back to us anytime as we are available 24/7 to take care of every partner’s concerns.
Appreciate your understanding and thanks for being our valuable partner. Have an amazing day!"

Which was quite a surprising statement for us. My reply therefore was (22 dec 2017):

"I’m chairman of the Blender Foundation. We choose to use a 100% ad-free channel for our work, this to emphasis our public benefit and non-profit goals.
According to your answer we are being forced to enable advertising now.
I would like to know where this new Youtube policy has been published and made official."

We then had every other month a reply like this:
"Please allow me some time to work with specialists on your issue. I’ll investigate further and will reach back to you with an update at the earliest possible.​
Appreciate your patience and understanding in the interim."​

Just last week, June 12, I mailed them again to ask for the status of this issue. The reply was:​
"I completely understand your predicament. Apologies for the unusual delay in hearing back from the Policy team. I’ve escalated this issue for further investigation and assistance. Kindly bear with us while we get this fixed.​
Appreciate your understanding in this regard."​

And then on June 15th the entire channel went black.​
To us it is still unclear what is going on. It could be related to Youtube’s new “subscription” system. It can also be just a human error or a bug; our refusal to monetize videos on a massively popular channel isn’t common.​
However – it remains a fair and relevant question to Google: do you allow adfree channels without monetization? Stay tuned!​

UPDATE JUNE 21, 2018:

Thursday June 21 2018, by Ton Roosendaal

Last night all videos came back (except the one from Andrew Price, which still is blocked in USA).
According to another person in Youtube we now *do* have to sign the other agreement as well. You can read it here.

I’m not sure if we should accept this. Will be studied on.

Wednesday 17h, June 20 2018, by Ton Roosendaal

None of our videos play still.

Wednesday 10.30h, June 20 2018, by Ton Roosendaal

Last night the Youtube Support team contacted Francesco Siddi by phone. As we understand it now it’s a mix of coincidences, bad UIs, wrong error messages, ignorant support desks and our non-standard decision to not monetize a popular Youtube channel.

The coincidence is that Youtube is rolling out their subscription system in Europe (and Netherlands). This subscription system will allow users to stream music and enjoy Youtube ad-free. They updated terms and conditions for it and need to get monetized channel owners to approve that. Coincidentally our channel was set to allow monetization.

The bad UI was that the ‘please accept the new terms’ button was only visible if you go the new Youtube “Content Manager” account, which I was not aware of and which is not active when you login to Youtube using the Foundation account to manage videos. The channel was also set to monatization mode which has no option to reset it. To make us even more confused, yesterday the system generated the wrong agreement to be signed.

Because of not accepting the new terms, the wrong error message was to put all videos on “Not available in your country” mode, which usually signals that there is a copyright issue. Similar happened for Andrew Price’s video last year, which (according to our new contact) was because of a trademark dispute but that was never made explicit to us.

All support desk people we contacted (since December last year) couldn’t find out what was wrong. They didn’t know that not accepting ‘terms and conditions’ could be causing this. Until yesterday they thought there was a technical error.

After reviewing the new terms and conditions (which basically is to accept the subscription system, I decided to accept that. According to the new Youtube contact our channel then would be back in a few hours.

Just while writing this, the video thumbnails appeared to be back! They don’t play yet.

Tuesday (afternoon) 19 June 2018, by Ton Roosendaal

We are doing a PeerTube test on video.blender.org. It is running on one of our own servers, in a European datacenter. Just click around and have some fun. We’re curious to see how it holds!
 
Last edited:

Codes 208

Member
And considering the amount of people getting hit by demonitization bullshit.

It really is a damned if you do, damned if you dont.
 

camelCase

Member
Lol how fucked up. Blender too, a great piece of OSS that has helped many people learn about 3D modeling.

Video hosting is not free. Youtube does not intend to be a charity.

Wow, it almost seems as if this post was meant to elicit a certain reaction.
 

Tapioca

Banned
Lol how fucked up. Blender too, a great piece of OSS that has helped many people learn about 3D modeling.



Wow, it almost seems as if this post was meant to elicit a certain reaction.


No, it is the truth. I see no problem with this. Youtubes goal is profit and video hosting is not free. Of course Youtube wants them to put ads on a video with a million views.
 
Last edited:

camelCase

Member
No, it is the truth. I see no problem with this. Youtubes goal is profit and video hosting is not free. Of course Youtube wants to them to put ads on a video with a million views.

It's douchey and you should have a problem with it. They make billions showing ads on questionable bs to kids. Not that I give a fuck about that, but they made they theirs. It's just an asshole thing to do and excusing that as "they have a business to run blah blah" is for the birds.

Advertising is insidious and a terrible influence on all of us. Putting it on an educational video is appalling. And plz don't reply this is how the industry works etc. Ads are bad, they are a bad influence on you and your kids and it's a goddamn shame that no one gives a fuck anymore.
 
Last edited:

brap

Banned
No, it is the truth. I see no problem with this. Youtubes goal is profit and video hosting is not free. Of course Youtube wants them to put ads on a video with a million views.
If youtube actually gave a fuck about money they'd stop demonitizing people who get millions of views per video just because they say "fuck" or other garbage.
 

Solomeena

Banned
Video hosting is not free. Youtube does not intend to be a charity.

Both of your replies are idiotic at the very least. Way to stick it to the non-profit organization there Tapioca, keep on fighting the good fight for a now evil corporation in Google/Alphabet. You should be ashamed of yourself honestly.
 

Fox Mulder

Member
This is why we need alternatives.

Who will run into the same exact issues with copyright holders, advertisers, and having too many users for humans to effectively moderate.

Any alternative will also likely have to come from another giant like Amazon or MS.
 

Rookje

Member
No, it is the truth. I see no problem with this. Youtubes goal is profit and video hosting is not free. Of course Youtube wants them to put ads on a video with a million views.
That's fine and all, but it does not say that anywhere in the terms of service.

Furthermore, if the video must have ads shown, why doesn't Google just enable the ads themselves?
 

20cent

Banned
My kids always randomly come across crappy 1h videos with ripped off licensed characters yelling at each other with maybe 20+ ad breaks. I guess these are fine.
 

Codes 208

Member
No, it is the truth. I see no problem with this. Youtubes goal is profit and video hosting is not free. Of course Youtube wants them to put ads on a video with a million views.
And yet they still have literally hundreds of others from various medians like gamers such as pewdiepie, jontron, game grumps, vanoss, h20delirious, mini ladd, jacksepticeye, pro jared, demodcracy, angry joe, vaativids, pbggamer. Music providers, one-hit wonderers, animators, trailer providers that keep trending providing what i imahine has to be millions in ad revenue.

This is one group who started off with the option of demonititazion. If they dont want it, why should youtube or google care? If you reqlly believe that youtube cares about any money wasted on hosting vids, then why dont they delete or even give shits about the thousands of videos with less than 100 views?
 
Top Bottom