i have yet to see a game with this scale running on the UE .Zophar said:Well, if it is real-time assets, then Gears of War pretty much lost the one thing it had going for it over Resistance. I fully expect R2 to look *and* play better than Gears 2.
HocusPocus said:Looking good. Might be my first PS3 game I'll buy this year, and actually the first since Resistance 1 (bought it with my system and Ninja Gaiden Sigma).
Well now...we have to cover ourselves and say "IN-GAME ASSETS" on account of Ratchet and Clank which should be brought up in say....Yoboman said:I can't see why Insomniac would break their track-record of ALWAYS showing real-time graphics. Even when everyone was showing CGI in 2005, they were the only ones showing real-time work. And same goes for Ratchet
They deserve the benefit of the doubt
Wollan said:If he has 19 hours left to live... how will he be able to cross the USA?
Life extension confirmed.
Not that anyone has said it's due to a disease or whatever though..
Eh...last time around the two got compared constantly. The exact same thing is going to happen this fall. I agree that they're two completely different games but you can't deny that there is a rivalry going on.RiverBed said:not a fair comparison at all given the size of both in-game play fields. compare R2 with other similarly large games, say like Battlefield: Bad Company?
by that, Gears 2 should look better. it would be an embarrassment if its the opposite.
in any case, if it isn't coming to PS3, then why the hell bother?
iceatcs said:
mr_nothin said:Nice waste of money..i wish i had monies to throw away like thou.
Shaders can visually fake the impression of round shapes when there is none...TheExodu5 said:It's possible...but damn the sheer polygon count for Nathan's perfectly round head would be pretty huge.
Proelite said:Bsg's Raiders anyone?
Zophar said:Well, if it is real-time assets, then Gears of War pretty much lost the one thing it had going for it over Resistance. I fully expect R2 to look *and* play better than Gears 2.
Atomspike said:Gears 2 being on the Unreal Engine disqualifies it to compete with PS3 first party games .
i think the Unreal Engine is overrated and lacks versatility , i have yet to see a game with this scale running on the UE .
Stike said:Shaders can visually fake the impression of round shapes when there is none...
Well maybe he just bought the ps3 like a month ago.OokieSpookie said:WTF is this shit?
Router said:
HocusPocus said:Looking good. Might be my first PS3 game I'll buy this year, and actually the first since Resistance 1 (bought it with my system and Ninja Gaiden Sigma).
Esperado said:Someone tell me how I would get this thing on my PS3.
shagg_187 said:Batman called. He wants his batplane back...
g35twinturbo said:looks interesting......I guess
Yoboman said:What Garnett once said about feeling like these guys are actually taking over Earth (compared to Halo 3) is so true. Just looking at that scene, how the fuck do the Humans have any chance at all?:lol
I don't mind comparing the best looking games- regardless of genre or type. but to specificall chose two is nonsensical. but that never stops some from doing it.Zophar said:Eh...last time around the two got compared constantly. The exact same thing is going to happen this fall. I agree that they're two completely different games but you can't deny that there is a rivalry going on.
jiggle said:teaser was an overstatement :lol 2/3 of the video consists of logo and stuffs :/
shagg_187 said:Exactly. Let me say this again:
Teaser:
Trailer:
It's possible...but damn the sheer polygon count for Nathan's perfectly round head would be pretty huge.
Esperado said:
Clanks head is too round. There are too many polygons for that to be real.
Alternate timeline. No WW2, no nuclear arsenal.Proelite said:Nukes? The United States must be sitting on thousands of them.
tanod said:Go to gametrailers.com with your PS3 and download the HD WMV version.
This takes place in the past, so nuclear weapons would not be as prevalent (if even in existence.) Of course, it's an alternate past, so really, anything goes.Proelite said:Nukes? The United States must be sitting on thousands of them.
Zophar said:Well, if it is real-time assets, then Gears of War pretty much lost the one thing it had going for it over Resistance. I fully expect R2 to look *and* play better than Gears 2.
ThirstyFly said:So can we get off the CG vs. Realtime thing for a bit and talk about the fact that. Was this hinted at in the first game? I'm sadit says Hale is going to die?
Yeah, like I said: ;_;Doubledex said:btw: Hale gonna die? :-( *sniff*
Nathan Hale; a walking nuclear fuck machine!Zophar said:Alternate timeline. No WW2, no nuclear arsenal.
Big-E said:Anyone else want some flight sequences in this game?
TONX said:
Looks like Hale is holding a floor-mounted Bullseye.
don't we all? ;pjiggle said:I want moar!
Zophar said:Alternate timeline. No WW2, no nuclear arsenal.
Yoboman said:I can't see why Insomniac would break their track-record of ALWAYS showing real-time graphics. Even when everyone was showing CGI in 2005, they were the only ones showing real-time work. And same goes for Ratchet
They deserve the benefit of the doubt
Z3F said:Always?
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2003/news/04/23/ratchetclank2/rc_screen001.jpg[/img]
I know for fact the final product didn't look like that on the PS2.
Wollan said:I want the Resistance PS3 trilogy to be the first drawn out franchise where humanity ends up being wiped out.With the Cloven taking over
Yoboman said:What Garnett once said about feeling like these guys are actually taking over Earth (compared to Halo 3) is so true. Just looking at that scene, how the fuck do the Humans have any chance at all?
Esperado said:Nothing impressive outside of the ani aliasing.
They always release screens/videos with in game assets. Of course promotional pictures and stuff are going to be enhanced with anti aliasing up the ass. Ratchet and Clank Future didn't look as good as the screenshots, but it definitely was 95% there. Just didn't have the crystal clear AA, which I doubt any game will have. It was all in game assets though, and the game you saw in pictures and TV was 95% what you got to play. I'm not expecting anything less with Resistance 2.
Says who? Nuclear weaponry can still fit into the timeline, it's just that they never got used because of WW2. Einstein was already in America when the alternate invasion happened IIRC, so I wouldn't be surprised to see nukesZophar said:Alternate timeline. No WW2, no nuclear arsenal.