blastprocessor
The Amiga Brotherhood
tmartn's network dropped him??
Did he have one? Plenty big youtubers don't.
tmartn's network dropped him??
and possibly rigging results effectively stealing who knows how much money
I am sure they would have to sign an agreement for not using anything provided by valve for illegal activities.
Whats makes you say this? Pretty tough accusations you´re making there!
But in many places gambling is not illegal, and it is not Valves job to police the internet, so what legal basis would Valve have to send a cease and desist?
If someone were running a site pretending to be affiliated with Valve, that would be c&d worthy, but as far as I can tell nobody is making such a claim.
Whats makes you say this? Pretty tough accusations you´re making there!
Serious response: It wouldn't be that unlikely that the results were rigged with their videos where they were winning thousands of dollars as a way to promote the website. I'm not aware if the people they were betting against were in on it, were just random players using the site or if they fixed any results outside of the videos they made (or even in the videos they made,I'm just going off h3h3's line of thinking about not disclosing they were the owners and actually having the ability to alter the results for promotion reasons)Whats makes you say this? Pretty tough accusations you´re making there!
Serious response: It wouldn't be that unlikely that the results were rigged with their videos where they were winning thousands of dollars as a way to promote the website. I'm not aware if the people they were betting against were in on it, were just random players using the site or if they fixed any results outside of the videos they made (or even in the videos they made,I'm just going off h3h3's line of thinking about not disclosing they were the owners and actually having the ability to alter the results for promotion reasons)
Non serious response: I'm currently looking for a squirrel to put in my apology video for misleading you.
What do 'many places' have to do with it? In many places it IS illegal, including where Valve is operating at.
You're acting like Valve can't just send a C&D to literally anyone they want. You're acting like Valve is literally helpless with their hands tied behind their backs, as though the law is going to prevent them from doing what they want with their own system to prevent gambling sites. All they have to do is update their TOS or EULA or whatever they want and start acting on it.
Good argument.Blizzard acts against shady shit like bot makers and stuff all the time. They actively seek out and ban accounts that are heavily involved in gold selling and the black market. Hell, they have an automatic flagging system to do it. Does it catch everyone? no. But Valve doesn't try to stop anyone, they could easily do the same. I'm sorry, but CSGOLOTTOBOT#15 who makes 30 transactions an hour is probably not a legitimate steam user. It's not hard to flag accounts for suspicious activity. A legitimate high volume user can be whitelisted (that's what Blizzard does in wow). Most people that are doing more than a handful of trades in a day, especially trades that aren't remotely of equal value (IE: nothing else at all in fact) are almost inevitably up to shady shit.
Welp, they sound screwed even if there's no proof of them rigging results ever found, but I'd imagine if there was any proof it'd be that much worse for them.The people they won against were not in on it. If you listen to the podcast below several of the people who lost to the streamers are looking into a class action suit. The podcast is well worth a listen to on the whole subject.
http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=16802961
Why do I get the feeling that we'll see an episode of Anerican Greed on this whole ordeal in a few years?
These dudes might get jail, penalties from the FTC or have Youtube earnings reversed - but I don't think there is any way for those people who gambled to get compensation.The people they won against were not in on it. If you listen to the podcast below several of the people who lost to the streamers are looking into a class action suit. The podcast is well worth a listen to on the whole subject.
http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=16802961
Yeah he was under a network before. I believe Polaris/Maker Studios but I could be wrong. He did get dropped from his network.Did he have one? Plenty big youtubers don't.
These dudes might get jail, penalties from the FTC or have Youtube earnings reversed - but I don't think there is any way for those people who gambled to get compensation.
Season 3 of American Crime StoryWhy do I get the feeling that we'll see an episode of Anerican Greed on this whole ordeal in a few years?
any updates? seems things are dying down
Blizzard acts against shady shit like bot makers and stuff all the time. They actively seek out and ban accounts that are heavily involved in gold selling and the black market. Hell, they have an automatic flagging system to do it. Does it catch everyone? no. But Valve doesn't try to stop anyone, they could easily do the same. I'm sorry, but CSGOLOTTOBOT#15 who makes 30 transactions an hour is probably not a legitimate steam user. It's not hard to flag accounts for suspicious activity. A legitimate high volume user can be whitelisted (that's what Blizzard does in wow). Most people that are doing more than a handful of trades in a day, especially trades that aren't remotely of equal value (IE: nothing else at all in fact) are almost inevitably up to shady shit.
To be honest, this is probably a good argument for why Valve doesn't bother. Blizzard spends (or used to spend) a ton of resources trying to clamp down on black market dealings, yet WoW has still had, for over a decade, a massive industry built entirely around stealing accounts, hacking, phishing, and filling game worlds with bots. Like CS:GO, there were and are entire companies and websites that do nothing but provide a method of converting gold to cash.
The WoW Token was explicitly an acknowledgement that conventional methods of combating black markets were completely ineffective, and that the only way to put a dent in them are through competing with them directly (which Valve already does).
To be honest, this is probably a good argument for why Valve doesn't bother. Blizzard spends (or used to spend) a ton of resources trying to clamp down on black market dealings, yet WoW has still had, for over a decade, a massive industry built entirely around stealing accounts, hacking, phishing, and filling game worlds with bots. Like CS:GO, there were and are entire companies and websites that do nothing but provide a method of converting gold to cash.
The WoW Token was explicitly an acknowledgement that conventional methods of combating black markets were completely ineffective, and that the only way to put a dent in them are through competing with them directly (which Valve already does).
I...what? Way to completely misunderstand. Blizz does this BECAUSE of the murky legal waters (in game gambling they shut down, which is VERY tame and benign compared to the CS:GO stuff, literally people playing with monopoly money) and to protect customers, saying they 'waste' resources is crazy, they're 'wasting' resources protecting customers and handling customer service complaints. Meanwhile Valve basically doesn't have customer service AND doesn't stop the sites, it's the worst of both sides of the deal. The wow token isn't an admission that you can't stop the black market, it's moreso simply win/win from a business perspective from them and tapping an aspect of the internet that actively harms their customer base. They don't suddenly cease policing the black market as best they can because of it.
It's baffling to me how much you go out of your way to try and twist logic to favor valve.
Blizz does this BECAUSE of the murky legal waters (in game gambling they shut down, which is VERY tame and benign compared to the CS:GO stuff, literally people playing with monopoly money)
Easily stopped in one swoop, turn off trading.
I believe the thread title should also mention that Valve is the one being sued. CSGO Lotto and the two little fish have merely been "added to one of two complaints filed".
Im really glad that this wasnt one of those situations where the internet brushes it under the rug and forgets about it after a week. I was positive it was gonna involve legal action eventually when i first heard about it.
Gotta stay subscribed so you can see the next apology video before he takes it down again!They barely lost any subscribers though
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
Haha hahahttps://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
When you neither want to lie nor throw somebody under the bus.https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
He means drag him in court.Drag him? Is that legalese or do you want him physically injured?
https://clips.twitch.tv/joshog/ExcitedOxVoHiYo
JoshOG, another owner of CSGO Lotto, awkward exchange with a fan when live streaming
As he wipes his tears away with cashBut he is really sorry. He means it from the bottom of his heart.
Legislation is still direly needed, setting precedents will help but this shit needs to be cracked up on for good.If they lose we don't need legislation, the legal precedence should send a clear message to both these shitty gambling websites and Valve that it's open season.