ShadowPampers
Banned
ajim said:
Morrowind also had randomized loot in the chests and containers, it just had items outside of containers placed in specific locations (does Oblivion make this too?)
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
TESV: Skyrim Game Informer info
- Thread starter Dennis
- Start date
- Status
Morrowind also had randomized loot in the chests and containers, it just had items outside of containers placed in specific locations (does Oblivion make this too?)
Confidence Man
Member
Darkshier said:
Do you really have to ask?
Synth_floyd
Banned
I like how they're making the quests more varied so that theoretically you would get different quests for different playthroughs in the game (assuming you don't play exactly the same character type).
Any word on factions?
Any word on factions?
Evolved1
make sure the pudding isn't too soggy but that just ruins everything
Bethesda always bullshits about how great their combat is going to be and it always sucks ass... so consider me taking anything they say about combat with a huge "whatever".
And level-scaling. :lol
I bet the animation will still be embarrassingly bad.
And level-scaling. :lol
I bet the animation will still be embarrassingly bad.
disappeared
Banned
maniac-kun said:
Excellent.
ShadowPampers
Banned
Lagspike_exe said:
Yeah, I agree, I think that the idea sounds really cool but I'm really esceptical about the dynamic quest things. Because of the amount of places and possiblities given in TES worlds, the chance of these instances being a few scripted quests pieces is very high.
recklessmind said:
Bad animation leads to awesome results.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBbm8sV6IKk
Hypereides
Member
DennisK4 said:
Im sold after this.. the leveling cap was annoying.
In regard to the engine, the article uses the terms "redesigned engine" and "new rendering engine". It's possible that it's still Gamebryo with a new graphics engine.
Visually, the graphics have improved significantly: shadows being cast on indoor objects; characters look way better, especially females; snow dynamically falls onto trees and objects, etc.
Visually, the graphics have improved significantly: shadows being cast on indoor objects; characters look way better, especially females; snow dynamically falls onto trees and objects, etc.
maniac-kun
Member
What? Combat was greatly improved from Morrowind to Oblivion.recklessmind said:Bethesda always bullshits about how great their combat is going to be and it always sucks ass... so consider me taking anything they say about combat with a huge "whatever".
And level-scaling. :lol
I bet the animation will still be embarrassingly bad.
disappeared
Banned
GhaleonEB said:
Indeed. And I imagine if you pool points into Athletics, there will be some great sprint/running perks.
Dodge/roll!
recklessmind said:Bethesda always bullshits about how great their combat is going to be and it always sucks ass... so consider me taking anything they say about combat with a huge "whatever".
And level-scaling. :lol
I bet the animation will still be embarrassingly bad.
let's just hope it's not a buggy mess first.
disappeared
Banned
Zenith said:
Those don't matter!
ShadowPampers
Banned
The faces look really good in that scan, and the overall graphics aren't hugely impressive, but they are definitely a good step above Oblivion, specially the envoiroments.
Also I would like to stress out again that in either case, when the modders are done with this game, it will look next gen.
Anyways, as long as the animations are good, then I'm really looking forward to this engine, wheter a new one or a modified Gamebryo.
Also I would like to stress out again that in either case, when the modders are done with this game, it will look next gen.
Anyways, as long as the animations are good, then I'm really looking forward to this engine, wheter a new one or a modified Gamebryo.
In one of the pictures, a character wearing Elvish-looking armor is standing in water [with a glowing axe] and the water seems to be reacting to his movements VERY realistically - i.e. splashing and disturbing the rest of the water surrounding him.
Can anyone confirm if that is actually the water physics or something else?
Can anyone confirm if that is actually the water physics or something else?
Simon Belmont
Banned
GhaleonEB said:
Yeah, it's a real bummer that they're making fast travel mandatory.
Evolved1
make sure the pudding isn't too soggy but that just ruins everything
maniac-kun said:
Go back and read the pre-release press from Oblivion. I'm serious. Go back and read what they were saying about the combat.
And it's pretty clear these motherfuckers are trolling us now using the word "radiant" to describe anything.
Go back and read about the "Radiant AI" they talked up before Oblivion released... :lol and then it wasn't even in the game. They are bullshitters dude. Some of the worst.
And I'd argue combat wasn't better in Oblivion, because the level scaling ruined the sense of danger. It's always been bad, but at least in Morrowind I was scared for my life for much of the game
until I became A GOD!!!!
edit: On a more positive note... some of these images look fucking amazing.
Imperial Hot
Banned
It definitely doesn't make or break my decision to purchase this game(I am going to buy the shit out of this game), but whether or not they are using Gamebryo really needs to be addressed. The screenshots look promising but they only showcase environments and creatures, they don't show any people or faces up close which is concerning. The new conversation system sounds interesting, I just hope that there character modeling and animations have been upgraded.
Sounds so good. It'd be better in the context of the game. And we won't know how good it all is until we play the game, obviously. But, everything sounds nice and the art direction is superb.
It seems there will be some gore, not sure how much, but definitely more than Oblivion. There have been so many times where I want to the chop the head off a fucking Spriggan.
It seems there will be some gore, not sure how much, but definitely more than Oblivion. There have been so many times where I want to the chop the head off a fucking Spriggan.
ShadowPampers
Banned
recklessmind said:
You are mixing the gameplay with the design way too much.
I also prefer Morrowind to Oblivion, because of the awful design Oblivion had, but I admit it greatly improved the combat. Fighting in melee was more fun, sneaking was more fun, and casting spells was also more fun.
Imperial Hot
Banned
But you don't have to use it. I personally don't mind traveling on foot but knowing that the option is there is nice. There would be more backlash if it wasn't present.GhaleonEB said:
Simon Belmont
Banned
GhaleonEB said:
It's a good thing they've got you thinking about it!
BlueTsunami
there is joy in sucking dick
Perks in my Elder Scrolls?
The whittling down of skills makes me sad though. Two steps forward, one step back.
The whittling down of skills makes me sad though. Two steps forward, one step back.
Simon Belmont said:
If it's anything like Oblivion, there will be fetch quests that send you across the entire world and back, so it might as well be mandatory since you'll be trekking for hours if you don't use it. The point is that if there was no fast travel, quests would be designed around that limitation.
British Monsoon
Member
DennisK4 said:
One of the biggest things I hated about Oblivion was that it was WAY too easy to specialise in everything. I have no self-control :lol if I'm a warrior but I find a kick-ass bow, I'd end up using that bow and by the latter stages of the game I'd be a warrior, thief, rogue, mage jack of all trades, whereas in Morrowind if you pick a mage, you're a mage for the game's entirety and using anything else effectively would take a lot of levelling. This encouraged repeat play-throughs (something I never felt obliged to do with Oblivion), as did the faction quest lines that would conflict with each other (another omission from Oblivion).
I can't say I'm surprised though - everything in that preview sounds like they're continuing to further refine the gameplay and mechanics so as to make the game more accessible to a wider audience, rather than pandering to the fanatics like me who only really want Morrowind again. That's cool though, I'll still be buying this day 1 and have come to terms with the fact that I'm never going to get another Elder Scrolls game quite as unforgiving as Morrowind, so it'll only hinder my enjoyment of Skyrim to keep comparing it to Morrowind.
BrokenEchelon
Banned
I really hope the animations especially during combat have been completely overhauled as they're one of the weakest parts of the entire series.
On level-scaling, what do you guys think is a better leveling system for an open world game? With fixed levels, players might get raped in the first dungeon they go in to because they're under-leveled. Basically the game will funnel players into certain directions based on their level, which makes it less of an open world game. With level-scaling, players can go practically anywhere and experience fair combat at any level.
Do you guys prefer the non-scaling system or do you think there is a better way to handle a leveling system for an open world game?
Do you guys prefer the non-scaling system or do you think there is a better way to handle a leveling system for an open world game?
disappeared
Banned
BlueTsunami said:
Fallout definitely had an influence on Beth's design philosophy. I can't complain. The perks sound like they're skill-based, i.e. more like D&D's Feats.
I didn't expect otherwise, but this is still disappointing for reasons I've elaborated on recently.
Basically, when a game is designed around a fast travel system like Oblivion/FO3, the quests will regularly send you huge distances away because the designers know that you'll just fast travel to the closest spot you have unlocked. Turning fast travel off via a mod, or not using fast travel out of principle, is just setting yourself up for frustration since you'll be doing hour long fetch quests.
In a game like Morrowind, you have fast travel between major hubs, not between every little point of interest. So quests are designed organically, with a quest in a city generally having to do with that city, and a quest sending you a long distance is done with purpose behind it. Exploration becomes more meaningful since you're less likely to find things further away from the hub locations. There's no big arrow telling you where to go, you need to work things out based on landmarks and quest text.
In a game like Risen, exploration is the focus and there's no scaling or Oblivion style fast travel. Enemies become more exotic and dangerous the further you go from the safety of the big city. You unlock teleportation to a few specific spots in the game world many hours into the game when you've already explored most of it. There's no scaling or big arrow on a minimap to tell you where to go, you have to work things out based on landmarks and actually knowing the game world over time.
:/
disappeared
Banned
EviLore said:
It's a shame, I know, but hopefully they learned their lesson regarding quests, if only a little.
Simon Belmont
Banned
Ledsen said:
Poor quest design is poor quest design, with or without fast travel.
ShadowPampers
Banned
cluto said:
Both can work as long as they are implemented well. I personally prefer really subtle scaling or no scaling at all.
Eh, the bit about you can kill a quest giver and still get the quest from their relative is the exact sort of instant-gratification, Player is God who can walk around doing whatever the fuck they want with no real consequences bullshit that I hate in RPGs from developers like Bethesda.
No meaningful consequences for player actions, level scaling 2.0, even more simplified skills and leveling system than Oblivion, and cementing a release date so far in advance demonstrating that once again Bethesda is going to ship the game when they want to ship it whether bugs make it barely playable or not -- nothing but red flags going up for me so far.
No meaningful consequences for player actions, level scaling 2.0, even more simplified skills and leveling system than Oblivion, and cementing a release date so far in advance demonstrating that once again Bethesda is going to ship the game when they want to ship it whether bugs make it barely playable or not -- nothing but red flags going up for me so far.
Simon Belmont
Banned
EviLore said:
On the flipside, I don't really have hours to spare walking back and forth between the same places. It may break the game for a person like you, but it makes the game for a person like me.
I really would have liked some more exploration and quests bound to the area I just stepped in. I am not sure how you do this with a story driven game like this is going to be, because you then always have the problem of the need (or the feel of need) to grind to get to the next main quest hub/point.
recklessmind said:
Not that Oblivion's combat is great, but it was a huge improvement over Morrowind's. Also, I don't remember crazy claims about how amazing the combat would be. I remember claims like "melee and archery do not feel like dice throws anymore (ie, you aim and if you hit, you hit)," "you can actively guard with a button instead of it being tied only to a stat," "you can do power moves," "enemies can follow you in and out of buildings now," and "enemies can pick up and use weapons that they find on the ground".
Dick Laurent
Member
gamebryo isn't an art styleImperial Hot said:
read the post again, jeez. how could you possibly not understand the point he was making?Simon Belmont said:
- Status