That's why I said that's it is a hard decision.
But never mind. I will put down my read list later on, since i do not have that much time left.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Gafia 3 [Mafia] | Welcome to Lynchwood Acres
- Thread starter Ourobolus
- Start date
That's why I said that's it is a hard decision.
But never mind. I will put down my read list later on, since i do not have that much time left.
I don't really get this vote? Can you elaborate Stan?
This whole exchange was actually pretty funny. I think Splinter brought up the possibility of switching shenanigans last night, what if scum!Vere thought Kalor was still alive as they hadn't targetted him and thus addressed the question to him?
But Vere also seems to have a problem with names, as shown in D1 XD. This exchange...don't know what to make of it. He wanted Kawl's opinion, but I don't think he followed up on that. Both of them have posted since this exchange. I think I'm leaning scum on Vere
amazing exchange thank you very much
If you have info to share, I'd say share it. We're at day 3 with no strong leads or usable info, and as you noted there is a good chance you'll die tonight anyway (especially now you've hinted at having info).
If we get that same info from your flip anyway, don't claim.
I'm actually starting to be a lot more unsure of my scum-read on Splinter. I mentioned before that I felt his reads on me and Crab were a bit wishy-washy, but actually he took a fairly strong stance on D2. He mentioned at least twice that he would side with Crab over me. Only the above post quoted was a little critical of Crab. He did end up with a vote on Crab at the end of the day however (yeah yeah I know he has justified it).
What's ticking me off is this: on D2 he mentioned Burb as a top scum read, but doesn't really do much to fight for it, which is something I would expect an active townie like Splinter to do. He seems content to continue with Crab vs Swamped. In this post 1936 he says there must be scum between the two of us because of the way we were pointing finger at each other. But it feels like he hadn't analyzed the situation well enough. I accused Crab on D1, then he accused me later that day (and that continued through D2). In this post he also conveniently cools off on Burb.
Splinter, what's your latest read on Burb? Or can you link me to a D3 post if you have already gone into it?
The other point is that he keeps harping on about how he has/had a strong connection between me and Vere, and that really felt like it was reaching.
Anyway, I'm really unsure about a Splinter lynch. I think I feel more confident about Blarg, even though I'm still not feeling great about Splinter. After D2 ended I somehow felt like the post quoted above was made to 'encourage' me to keep my vote on Crab (which felt weird because Splinter was town-reading him) but that's really...well the world does not revolve around me. I think Crab's flip made me look for scum in places I wasn't looking before, and that's why I started to think about Splinter more closely.
If Gorlak (or others, I think acohrs has a vote on him as well) can make a good case, I am all ears really.
VOTE: Blargonaut
This post doesn't ring true btw. I'll come back to it when I have time if noone beats me to it.
Ask and yeh shall receive
Seems clear you scum-read him, and the way I understood he was at some point during D2 your top scum read, but maybe I was wrong about that.
Bad logic is worthless town or scum. Town should be able to better explain where the disconnect is as they are making good faith arguments. Scum is not, and is usually purposefully put forth made up arguments they don't genuinely believe. They find it harder to back up their arguments and so are more likely to roll over on them.
Which as frustrating as I'm sure it will be for acohrs, is why his reaction means I'll be leaving my vote on him. Reads more to me like scum rolling back on position that's getting them blow back. Think town!acorhs doubles down there.
Hope my flip isn't too surprising for you then
On mobile so no quote.
Acohrs why do you list Sorian and Splinter as the only two people on both town lynches? I voted for squidyj and crab so why am I not on the list?
If anything Splinter and Sorian only joined the Crab lynch for tie stopping purposes and Sorian did the same on squid. So my name should be the one sticking out.
From my pov that is pretty scummy because you omit me when I have plenty of scum heat to go after other contributing players for flimsy reasoning.
VOTE: acohrs
Acohrs why do you list Sorian and Splinter as the only two people on both town lynches? I voted for squidyj and crab so why am I not on the list?
If anything Splinter and Sorian only joined the Crab lynch for tie stopping purposes and Sorian did the same on squid. So my name should be the one sticking out.
From my pov that is pretty scummy because you omit me when I have plenty of scum heat to go after other contributing players for flimsy reasoning.
VOTE: acohrs
shit, you did, didn't you? Fuck, well just lynch me then, I obviously don't care enough anymore to read properly
Okay, I'm trying to make head or tails of your posts nin, but I'm really struggling to find a role that fits with what you've been hinting and saying now.
Is this making sense to anyone else? I'm not in peak mental shape after the weekend so maybe I'm missing something. Otherwise, it's hard to know whether this is folly or not. I find it pretty concerning that a town role would be suggesting their lynch is the best play day 3 with no scum flip yet.
No
If scum kill Bronx, he still has time to save you. He only fails if they block him, in which case at least they can't block someone else.
Also look at it this way, even if we assume that scum will block and kill Bronx:
Lynch nin
We lose nin and Bronx.
Lynch someone else
We lose nin and Bronx, but also get a lynch of our choosing and scum were forced to block Bronx.
The second is clearly better, even under your pessimistic assumptions. It's actually even worse if they don't kill Bronx because then we have another night of no info about him (since he didn't have to try and save you).
In summary:
No.
nin 3.0
No I mean they are lovers if one is NK'd but not if one is lynched.
So NK on either is two deaths, lynch on either is only one.
WhereAreMahDragonz
Banned
Gut read. Wanted to prod a bit and see how he would react,
WhereAreMahDragonz
Banned
Well? Do you? I especially like bananas
WhereAreMahDragonz
Banned
I mean in OW I was the Cupid neutral and my lovers would both die if one of them was NK'd or lynched
Ouro was in that game too...
awee come on. in that moment i tried to help town. i still am you guys.
will follow up with a nin read list
no mate. my role is really dumb. i dont even have a night action per se.
so i cant really say Splinter.
That question was legitimately what I thought at the time, I just got distracted with the questions on why I said Kalor and forgot about it. Honestly, I made that post after going through the thread from day start(I was busy and accidentally forgot) and remembered two K's, one was dead and the other I was interested in their ld votes. I didn't really want to open another page after finishing my post(mobile) to go back and see which so I put K and auto correct gave me Kalor. I thought that sounded...right. I didn't expect to get hounded from that though.
I believe in you nin.
Fair enough. We will see that if you die, so no need to claim.
Lone_Prodigy
Member
Less talk, more votes. We've got time to change wagons.
I'm keeping my vote on TWE for now. His most recent posts inspire no confidence and I wouldn't be opposed to getting rid of an inactive at this point.
Which also means I wouldn't be opposed to a Blarg lynch.
Was going to comment on acohrs' terrible reads list but everyone is already on his case. His defense is pretty uninspiring too. I would prefer to keep him around since he does seem fairly active even if he's not helping.
I'm keeping my vote on TWE for now. His most recent posts inspire no confidence and I wouldn't be opposed to getting rid of an inactive at this point.
Which also means I wouldn't be opposed to a Blarg lynch.
Was going to comment on acohrs' terrible reads list but everyone is already on his case. His defense is pretty uninspiring too. I would prefer to keep him around since he does seem fairly active even if he's not helping.
DAY 3 VOTES
theworthyedge (3)
burbeting 2284
lone_prodigy 2286
franconp 2466
acohrs (3)
flatearthpandas 2293
kawl_usc 2483
faddy 2511
*splinter (2)
gorlak 2426
acohrs 2472
ccs (1)
stanleypalmtree 2390
verelios (1)
kyanrute 2438
blargonaut (1)
swamped 2505
swamped (1)
sorian 2266
bronx-man (0)
acohrs 2250 (2360)
Day 3 Ends:
11 for Majority.
theworthyedge (3)
burbeting 2284
lone_prodigy 2286
franconp 2466
acohrs (3)
flatearthpandas 2293
kawl_usc 2483
faddy 2511
*splinter (2)
gorlak 2426
acohrs 2472
ccs (1)
stanleypalmtree 2390
verelios (1)
kyanrute 2438
blargonaut (1)
swamped 2505
swamped (1)
sorian 2266
bronx-man (0)
Day 3 Ends:
11 for Majority.
Lone_Prodigy
Member
In response to Sorian's question about his D2 Blarg vote:
It wasn't the actual vote that was bad, it was the timing I didn't like. At that point the Crab wagon hadn't taken off (a subsequent votes list was about 3-2-2-whatever) but no one paid any attention to a single vote on Blarg and then discussion eventually shifted back to Crab v Swamped. It didn't generate any discussion and kept you on the periphery of the current vote leaders.
It wasn't the actual vote that was bad, it was the timing I didn't like. At that point the Crab wagon hadn't taken off (a subsequent votes list was about 3-2-2-whatever) but no one paid any attention to a single vote on Blarg and then discussion eventually shifted back to Crab v Swamped. It didn't generate any discussion and kept you on the periphery of the current vote leaders.
Why hasn't Blarg commented on your fruit posts? He likes posts with food in them for some reason.
There was really only one vote on verelios before ccs just now? Really?
My take from reading the thread over this morning was a great deal more pressure on him than that. Interesting, that.
Let's see votes from everyone if they would. We have scant few hours remaining.
(Also is our timer based on GMT? So it didn't move with the start of daylight savings time?)
My take from reading the thread over this morning was a great deal more pressure on him than that. Interesting, that.
Let's see votes from everyone if they would. We have scant few hours remaining.
(Also is our timer based on GMT? So it didn't move with the start of daylight savings time?)
PST. It should have moved? It should end at 2PM PST, which is what I've been doing.
U S A
U S A
U S A
daylight savings time sucks, but like 70 other countries do this insanity too
Blargonaut
Banned
Did I ever tell you the definition of chocolate pudding?
Blargonaut
Banned
Everywhere I look
Everywhere I read
The first time Verelios said that? I dunno
I thought Vere was bullshitting me, so
Everywhere I read
The first time Verelios said that? I dunno
I thought Vere was bullshitting me, so