• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NATO Analysts: "Russia ‘stoking refugee unrest in Germany to topple Angela Merkel’"

  • Thread starter Deleted member 80556
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

Kathian

Banned
Merkel is the most important leader in Europe for now. She is very pro-EU, which is a threat to Russia which would like to have Eastern Europe back into its sphere of influence. The EU is taking that away (and rightfully so after decades of oppression by Russia there).

Germany is never going to have a non-pro EU leader. Merkel brought these reactions from her actions. Its not a conspiracy. If the Russians are fueling things its to fuel far right groups outside of Germany to weaken Europe. Merkel is not the strategic goal.
 
Its very obvious. All the right wing conspiracy websites are talking about how great Putin is an how bad Merkel and the EU is.
Russia Today just started its german branch and its utter shit. It actually seems to be aimed at right wing Youtube commenters.

And then you have incidents like recently when a girl disappeard and Russian Media was sure that she was abducted by refugees, even though she reappeard a few hours later and it was all a misunderstanding.
Then russian media said german police is coverin it up and the girl was actually killed.
And obviously right wing blogs and websites in germany eat it up and eventually people like the idiots on the PEGIDA demonstrations pick it up.
 

Condom

Member
The ironic thing is that even some migrants and their children support this shit and all the other "anti-Western" things Russia does while living in the West themselves (like some in this thread).
However, life's going to be pretty damn shitty for them once the nationalist / neo-Nazi parties gain upper hand in their countries.
Well yeah those migrant children see the shit the West does on TV every fucking day. 'White' kids don't watch AL Jazeera when they're at home, they just see the happy joy joy Western side of life.

It's not that most migrant children care about Russia but more about the fact that they have become apathetic after all these years of mindless Western killing.
 
Yes I'm really going to believe NATO propaganda about Russia. NATO is still super pissed Russia outplayed their asses on the whole Syria issue and they don't have a solution that doesn't involve a direct attack on Russia since telling Russia to GTFO of Syria isn't working.
 

Riddick

Member
Obviously, I don't think anyone can seriously think that Russia is the only one "stocking unrest", it's a large scale pissing contest that has been going for over 50 years. Perhaps there was a decade where Russia wasn't too involved in foreign policy matters but at the time they didn't have NATO on their doorstep, or US funding opposition in places like Ukraine.

Saying Russia is stocking the current refugee crisis could be true to the degree but obviously the bigger reason is how Western States deal with Middle East and Northern Africa. Removing dictators has created a huge power vacuum and instability which has lead to the huge refugee wave and civil wars in places like Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Libya etc.

I'm just baffled at the audacity NATO has to blame Russia for this. Russia might be using the current crisis for their own interests but who the fuck started all this in the first place? And now they complain about dirty tactics? Seriously?


The ironic thing is that even some migrants and their children support this shit and all the other "anti-Western" things Russia does while living in the West themselves (like some in this thread).
However, life's going to be pretty damn shitty for them once the nationalist / neo-Nazi parties gain upper hand in their countries.

When your country is destroyed because a bunch of Western pricks decided to destabilize it in order to promote their interests in the region it's not hard to hate the West. They end up being refugees in those countries not because of their own choice but because they had to. Libya for example used to have public housing, free education, free health care and an independent banking system that made the country independent. Ghadafi was a prick but he was a fucking saint compared to what they have now.


Leaked cables suggest U.S. stoking civil unrest in Syria years before the civil war broke out against Assad. Probably false rumors, as only Russia would stoop down to such tactics.

Fun fact: I've been reading lately on Chile because imo it was the first neoliberal experiment and the beginning of this nightmare ideology all over the world, and CIA pulled the exact same shit before the Pinochet dictatorship that left thousands murdered and tortured and a middle class in shambles.
 
Russia jumped on Merkels open borders policy and that of other countries. How much "destabilization" can some ghost stories cause though? Like their economy tanking, right wing, anti-EU gubment gets elected etc.
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
Its very obvious. All the right wing conspiracy websites are talking about how great Putin is an how bad Merkel and the EU is.
Russia Today just started its german branch and its utter shit. It actually seems to be aimed at right wing Youtube commenters.

And then you have incidents like recently when a girl disappeard and Russian Media was sure that she was abducted by refugees, even though she reappeard a few hours later and it was all a misunderstanding.
Then russian media said german police is coverin it up and the girl was actually killed.
And obviously right wing blogs and websites in germany eat it up and eventually people like the idiots on the PEGIDA demonstrations pick it up.
Ugh, I don't dabble enough in local online communities to be aware of this shit but all of this sounds fucking dumb.
 
Its very obvious. All the right wing conspiracy websites are talking about how great Putin is an how bad Merkel and the EU is.
Russia Today just started its german branch and its utter shit. It actually seems to be aimed at right wing Youtube commenters.

And then you have incidents like recently when a girl disappeard and Russian Media was sure that she was abducted by refugees, even though she reappeard a few hours later and it was all a misunderstanding.
Then russian media said german police is coverin it up and the girl was actually killed.
And obviously right wing blogs and websites in germany eat it up and eventually people like the idiots on the PEGIDA demonstrations pick it up.

lol I didn't know about that. As if the whole thing wasn't fucked up enough.
But it's incredible what a big pile of bullshit RT Germany is
 

Yamauchi

Banned
It's nice to have ideas and say things. I like to do those things too, but unless they can provide evidence for their claims the theory itself remains baseless.
Leaked cables suggest U.S. stoking civil unrest in Syria years before the civil war broke out against Assad. Probably false rumors, as only Russia would stoop down to such tactics.
Unlike these NATO analysts, we have evidence that points to this. Here is one document where US officials discuss formenting a Sunni rebellion in Syria in 2006: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06DAMASCUS5399_a.html There are several others, including a positive assessment of the possibility of an islamic emirate emerging in western Syria.
 
When your country is destroyed because a bunch of Western pricks decided to destabilize it in order to promote their interests in the region it's not hard to hate the West. They end up being refugees in those countries not because of their own choice but because they had to. Libya for example used to have public housing, free education, free health care and an independent banking system that made the country independent. Ghadafi was a prick but he was a fucking saint compared to what they have now.
We're really going to pretend that during that time the world didn't scream out for someone to step in and stop Ghadafi's killing?
 

Condom

Member
We're really going to pretend that during that time the world didn't scream out for someone to step in and stop Ghadafi's killing?
NATO had a big propaganda campaign during the Libyan revolution and it worked.

There were more than enough people against intervention. You sound like those Americans who say that everybody thought Iraq had WMDs.
 
NATO had a big propaganda campaign during the Libyan revolution and it worked.

There were more than enough people against intervention. You sound like those Americans who say that everybody thought Iraq had WMDs.
Any reason the other nations of the Security Council didn't vote against it then?

Iraq went ahead without support from a ton of nations. The Libyan situation is clearly different.
 

Condom

Member
Any reason the other nations of the Security Council didn't vote against it then?

Iraq went ahead without support from a ton of nations. The Libyan situation is clearly different.
AFAIK the UN resolution was for a no fly zone and not regime change.
 
AFAIK the UN resolution was for a no fly zone and not regime change.
A no fly zone with the clear goal to help the rebels trying to topple Ghadafi. And the use of force to protect civilians. NATO did not go in on the ground and fought Ghadafi there themselves.

The resolution, adopted under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter:

- demands the immediate establishment of a ceasefire and a complete end to violence and all attacks against, and abuses of, civilians;
- imposes a no-fly zone over Libya;
- authorizes all necessary means to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas, except for a "foreign occupation force";
- strengthens the arms embargo and particularly action against mercenaries, by allowing for forcible inspections of ships and planes;
- imposes a ban on all Libyan-designated flights;
- imposes an asset freeze on assets owned by the Libyan authorities, and reaffirms that such assets should be used for the benefit of the Libyan people;
- extends the travel ban and assets freeze of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 to a number of additional individuals and Libyan entities;
- establishes a panel of experts to monitor and promote sanctions implementation.
 

Condom

Member
We all know the rebels were stocked by NATO or at the very least NATO's allies (Qatar for instance). That stuff was revealed on several news channels.

Fact is that many people did not agree to support the rebels, just like now with Syria.
 
We all know the rebels were stocked by NATO or at the very least NATO's allies (Qatar for instance). That stuff was revealed on several news channels.

Fact is that many people did not agree to support the rebels, just like now with Syria.
"Many people" might not have supported it, but the leaders of the most important nations in the world had a vote on it and nobody clearly opposed it. Russia could have voted no, but they didn't. I'd say blaming a bunch of "Western pricks" for the whole Libya situations is a large simplification of the events that went down.

Of course now we have this region in civil war and we are looking at Italy going in with soldiers which doesn't look too good.
 
Leaked cables suggest U.S. stoking civil unrest in Syria years before the civil war broke out against Assad. Probably false rumors, as only Russia would stoop down to such tactics.

Yeah , the United States have never done something like that before, NEVER.

Dick Cheney was a russian mole, Kissinger and Donald rumsfeld too,
 
Interesting that every German in this thread agrees with the Op's assessment, yet Putin's useful idiots keep screaming conspiracy theory and posting random, oftentimes unrelated BS. It's not only RT and russophone Russian tv either, it's a whole slew of FB groups created around pro-Russian, pro-Assad, anti-West, playing on anti-Refugees sentiment to strengthen an anti-Merkel & anti-systemic agitation.
RT and Russian tv does it semi-openly and transparently so that, let's just say, mostly weak-minded German individuals and not integrated German immigrants fall for their shit, but stuff like the hijacking of the German Anonymous group is more sinister than that (look at their reach). They have moved on to the Russian VK social network now, incidentally a place where also German neo-Nazis move to to hide their activities from the German authorities.

And not only NATO has been investigating Russian activities, but also the BND:

Germany is investigating suspicions that pro-Kremlin media are seeking to fan tensions over Europe’s refugee crisis with a string of phony reports, including claims the Cologne sex assaults were carried out by drug addicts hired by the CIA.

Berlin’s counter-espionage agency has been tasked with investigating whether Russia’s Vladimir Putin has reverted to Cold War tactics to destabilise Germany, according to German media reports last week that also noted Chancellor Angela Merkel had expressed a “personal interest” in the matter.

The Russian president is suspected of seeking to “sow the seeds of discord in Europe by weakening Germany and Angela Merkel”, according to German intelligence sources quoted by Sueddeutsche Zeitung as well as the NDR and WDR television networks.

The news agencies cited the pro-Kremlin media’s alarmist and often unfounded reports on Germany’s record influx of refugees, which has caused tensions in parts of the country and weighed heavily on Merkel’s approval ratings.

While the government in Berlin has not officially filed a complaint, spokeswoman Christiane Wirtz said it was “closely monitoring the current spike in Russian media activity”.

(...)
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
Leaked cables suggest U.S. stoking civil unrest in Syria years before the civil war broke out against Assad. Probably false rumors, as only Russia would stoop down to such tactics.
Yeah , the United States have never done something like that before, NEVER.
Lmao, I didn't even read the latter part but it seems like params7 was being sarcastic. You'd have to be one dense goose to not know about U.S. foreign intervention.
 

commedieu

Banned
Hmmm, let me think. Who started the Iraq war that is the main cause of this clusterfuck in the Middle East? Who spread propaganda and later funded and armed the Libya and Syria rebels? Was it Russia? Hmmm, I think it was NATO members who did all that shit.

Putin was behind it all. They tricked us into doing it.
 

Quixzlizx

Member
I have no first hand knowledge of any of this and I definitely wouldn't put it past Russia to try it (or any country for that matter, all major geopolitical players fund and support opposition organizations in other countries) and it's certainly a shameful thing to do -
HOWEVER, he better have damn strong evidence, because stoking fears of refugees as agents provocateurs can lead to really bad things, like it had done in the past.

If you had read the article, you would've realized that the claim is that Russia is funding anti-refugee far-right parties, not associating with the refugees themselves.
 

Nikodemos

Member
It does make sense. Putin has repeatedly personally humiliated Merkel during their meetings (as an example, Merkel is absolutely terrified by dogs since she was attacked as a child; in one of their first meetings, Putin brought one of his dogs along in the conference room) so she bears a grudge against him. Furthermore, the rest of German politicians (and I use the term exceedingly loosely) are either utter imbeciles unable to find their own assholes with a mirror and an air defence searchlight, or Schroederites all too happy to get their lips around Russian cock.
 
I'll bump this thread every time Russian media is making new attempts at stroking unrest in Germany.

26.03.2016: Russian state-owned Sputnik (aka. RT in different colors):

Total Confusion: Did Merkel Take a Selfie With Brussels Attack Suspect?

A photo depicting German Chancellor Angela Merkel taking a selfie with a man allegedly resembling Brussels bomber Najim Laachraoui has gone viral.

The image published online depicts Merkel posing for a selfie with a refugee whose resemblance to the Paris bomb-maker and Brussels attacker Najim Laachraoui has been vividly discussed by Internet users.

The picture was taken in September and has caused heated debate after recent terrorist attacks in Brussels.

A series of terrorist attacks took place in the Brussels Airport and the Maelbeek metro station on Tuesday morning. As result of the attacks at least 31 people were killed and over 300 injured.

BW56zvZ.png


...

Also spread in German, on twitter & fb.

Pic originated from @RockiDave:

dJIM6Uj.png


The news went viral in far right / anti-systemic fb groups & sites.

An English article:

Angela Merkel's selfie with Syrian refugee goes viral after he is wrongly named as Brussels bomber | Europe | News | The Independent
 

Archer

Member
For a few weeks now there has been a lot of stuff coming out regarding this. Going as far back as the New Years cases with Russia deliberately creating false cases etc.

Russia benefits by a deeply divided and conflicted Europe.

As well, Russia benefits from Trump.
 

orochi91

Member
Perhaps they should consider removing some sanctions on Russia.

That country clearly has too much sway with Far-Right groups throughout Europe.
 

AlphaDump

Gold Member
I've been highly suspicious on multiple outlets of this occurring. Neogaf is on that list, too. The Russia/Ukraine and some political threads are rather eye opening when it comes to certain posters.

Social engineering attacks are no joke.

edit: See below and check out posting history :D
 
wow do some people seriously believe this? What the hell, the EU has itself to blame for this crisis by allowing millions of refugees to migrate to the EU zone. Even before the crisis there were already big problems with migrants from "problematic" countries in some countries.

Also call me crazy or Putin-bot or whatever but jesus Neogaf has such a persecution complex in regards to Russia
 
Also call me crazy or Putin-bot or whatever but jesus Neogaf has such a persecution complex in regards to Russia
Russia has done some majorly shady shit lately. You might have noticed their invasion of Ukraine that is still ongoing. Their use of social media and misinformation is also pretty well known here. And Russia's own persecution complex with NATO, which they blame for everything. So yes, people don't like Russia - or more accurately Putin and his buddies. And for good reason.
 

orochi91

Member
wow do some people seriously believe this? What the hell, the EU has itself to blame for this crisis by allowing millions of refugees to migrate to the EU zone. Even before the crisis there were already big problems with migrants from "problematic" countries in some countries.

Russia's behaviour is a known phenomenon, with numerous examples in this thread and on reputable news sites as well.
 
Russia has done some majorly shady shit lately. You might have noticed their invasion of Ukraine that is still ongoing. Their use of social media and misinformation is also pretty well known here. And Russia's own persecution complex with NATO, which they blame for everything. So yes, people don't like Russia - or more accurately Putin and his buddies. And for good reason.

All that is true, but just because Russia might be actually doing this, it doesn't mean it's happening because of them, the influence of Russia in current events in regards to refugees in Europe is practically null, as Merkel brought it upon herself when she welcomed the refugees, triggering even a bigger influx of them. She's becoming more hated by the Germans because they are realizing the situation is unsustainable and the effect on their society is not so positive. Merkel has improved her approval ratings recently because she is trying to undo all the mess she is responsible for, but Germans are not fans of her.
 
Perhaps they should consider removing some sanctions on Russia.

That country clearly has too much sway with Far-Right groups throughout Europe.
Perhaps Russia should gtfo of Ukraine first? Which was the reason for sanctions in the first place. Over and over, EU & US keep saying sanctions will start to be lifted when progress in made in occupied Ukraine (not even mentioning the annexed Crimea here), instead Putin chooses to play dumb.
Why should land grabs be rewarded in the first place? Because the country grabbing the land is favorite among Nazis and we should be afraid of it? lmao.

I've been highly suspicious on multiple outlets of this occurring. Neogaf is on that list, too. The Russia/Ukraine and some political threads are rather eye opening when it comes to certain posters.

Social engineering attacks are no joke.

edit: See below and check out posting history :D
While Russia's war in Ukraine was in full swing (and especially after MH17), we've even had gaf mods talk about unusual agitprop activity with Russian IPs.

Generally, there seems to be a lot of overlap between Putinists, pro Assad ppl. & anti-Western left & right fringe, but sometimes you can just smell the Putin bots, especially in comments sections under some news concerning Russia - holy fuck, the circus is in full swing there, still.
 

orochi91

Member
Perhaps Russia should gtfo of Ukraine first? Which was the reason for sanctions in the first place. Over and over, EU & US keep saying sanctions will start to be lifted when progress in made in occupied Ukraine (not even mentioning the annexed Crimea here), instead Putin chooses to play dumb.
Why should land grabs be rewarded in the first place? Because the country grabbing the land is favorite among Nazis and we should be afraid of it? lmao.

US and European powers meddled in Ukraine, with regards to geopolitics, the end result of which was the annexation of Crimea and Ukrainian Civil War.

This is undeniable and has been discussed numerous times.

Throwing sanctions on top of that was naturally going to illicit a response from Russia, in this case they are throwing their weight behind Far-Right groups and feeding rising nationalistic propaganda throughout Europe.

Lessening those sanctions would ease the situation dramatically.
 
An article on the German - Russian relations (in face of Lavrov's repeated insistence on this made up rape case):

Ties between Germany and Russia enter new chill | Reuters

After the girl's claims were reported by Russian media in January, Lavrov accused Germany of "sweeping problems under the rug." The Berlin public prosecutor's office, though, said a medical examination had found the girl had not been raped.

That was why Germany's Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier was so upset when Lavrov raised the issue again. "I can only hope that such incidents and difficulties, as we had in that case, aren't repeated," he told reporters afterwards.

The rape case is indicative of the mutual suspicion that officials from both countries say extends to the highest levels of government. At the root of those tensions lie opposing visions for Europe and the Middle East. Those rival visions have led to clashes at diplomatic negotiating tables, in cyberspace and in the media.

German and other European security officials accuse Russian media of launching what they call an "information war" against Germany. By twisting the truth in reports on Germany's migrant crisis, the officials say, Russia hopes to fuel popular angst, weaken voters' trust in Chancellor Angela Merkel, and feed divisions in the European Union so that it drops sanctions against Moscow.

"Russian propaganda is a danger to the cohesion of our society," Ole Schroeder, German deputy interior minister and a member of Merkel's conservatives, told Reuters.

...

But officials in Berlin say Russia's aim is to muddy what is true and what is not and shake Germans' trust in Merkel. "The idea today is to get disinformation, which means you don't believe anything," Hans-Peter Hinrichsen, a Foreign Ministry official, told a recent meeting on Russia's role in Europe at the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP).

German and European officials say Russia's aim is two-fold: To exaggerate the problems the migrant crisis is causing Germany and to push Germany to relax its backing for European sanctions on Russia over Moscow's interference in Ukraine. While EU governments last month extended asset freezes and travel bans on Russians and Russian companies, there is less consensus on whether to prolong more far-reaching sanctions on Russia's banking, defence and energy sectors from July.

Both sides agree on one point: relations between the two countries are at their lowest point since the early days of the Cold War.

....Historic conext.

US and European powers meddled in Ukraine, with regards to geopolitics, the end result of which was the annexation of Crimea and Ukrainian Civil War.

This is undeniable and has been discussed numerous times.

Throwing sanctions on top of that was naturally going to illicit a response from Russia, in this case they are throwing their weight behind Far-Right groups and feeding rising nationalistic propaganda throughout Europe.

Lessening those sanctions would ease the situation dramatically.

You are regurgitating Russian agitprop rhetoric, especially with the civil war bit. And you're quoting op-eds. And not just some op-eds, but ones from 2014 when scores of gullible, often nostalgically Soviet-sympathizing, journalists believed the Russian lies & denials. The WP piece cites Stephen F. Cohen, an RT regular contributor. If anything, this just shows you the tenacious insistence of the Western media to listen to all sides even if it's clear that one of the sides if lying to your face. Outside of op-eds, the Guardian argues:
Ukraine’s leader set up secret offshore firm as battle raged with Russia | News | The Guardian
Civil war my ass. None of what you brought up is "numerous" or "undeniable".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom