• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

John Walker on GMA's: Please don't go

unbias

Member
Essentially talking about the horrid experience and its interaction and effects on the game industries journalists/press. Good read, essentially calling the event demeaning. Will be interesting to see who participates.

Anywho, from the article: http://botherer.org/2013/05/24/why-the-gmas-so-called-media-academy-prize-is-so-demeaning/

This year there are definitely some claimed improvements... What hasn’t changed is that it’s an evening funded by publishers and PRs, in which they provide the games journalists who report on them with free food and limitless free drink, and then present them with awards sponsored by themselves. It’s promoted as a piss-up, and it has, for years, been the British games industry at its most tawdry, wretched, and dubious. From the first year’s awarding of prizes to magazines owned by the sponsors of the categories, to the despicable antics of two years ago with the Grainger Games sponsorship, to last year’s disgraceful mess of journalists tweeting adverts for games to win a Playstation, it has always been a horror show. That it has cleaned up a fraction of its act is progress, but it’s certainly not anything for celebration. That most of the UK games industry will still happily trundle along for the free booze, no matter how it associates them with it all, is hugely demoralizing.

And this year they’ve added the ludicrously named “Games Media Academy”. This pompously grandiose title is really just a prize for a single person – an unpaid hopeful writer – of £1000 of commissions, and some unexplained (and indeed entirely unmentioned by the actual description at the bottom of the page) “mentoring” from “some of the biggest names in games media”.

The prize is to get some paid work.

The idea of doing exactly this, but pretending it’s a special prize, simultaneously demeans both the writers submitting their work, and the entire occupation itself. It reduces our job down to a special treat, given out to one lucky person, and a ruffle of their hair. And it reduces potential writers down to entrants in a competition, and then pretends that doing the work that earns the money is some manner of award! It’s outrageous. There is NO prize! They get £1000 for doing £1000 worth of work!


More in the link, worth a read for sure.
 
So its like that Tester show thing lol.

Is writing for games still such a hot job these days? I mean I still hear about them on podcast emails, but it sounds super hard to get into these days, and it seems more and more shady.

And it's not like the pay is worth bragging home about.
 

daveo42

Banned
The whole article is disgusting. Is there no such thing as journalistic integrity or ehtics in games journalism? At least that's the UK. We don't have anything like that here...

Oh wait...

I forgot about the VGAs...
 

unbias

Member
"There's a reason why everyone in the business hates him"? Wasn't it something like that? When a prick like Parfitt attacks you, you're doing something right.

8xHF2pP.png


Ya...
 

JDSN

Banned
In an industry that is increasingly screwing over new writers by not paying them, some might want to argue this as a positive step. I’d suggest that’s a bit like giving a trophy to husbands who don’t beat their wives. What it is, in fact, is publishers doing their damned jobs, and pretending it’s something special. It’s like telling a plumber they’ve won the lucky prize that you’ll pay them to fix your sink.

He has always hated the practice of unpaid "interships", but he really got to botton of the issues this time.
 
Top Bottom