And to think, some of you guys thought the game would run at 1080p 60fps on PS4....
http://blog.ubi.com/watch-dogs-next-gen-game-resolution-dynamism/
downgrade me if old
edit:
legit shook, was expecting 1080p30 on PS4, just getting the PC version even if I hate Uplay
It's perfectly reasonable for someone who spends $400 or $500 on a console to want to make sure that the game runs at full HD resolution and a reasonable framerate, because guess what? That also impacts gameplay. It's not just, visual, even though it also impacts that. So you have something that impacts both gameplay and visuals, both elements which are vitally important to gaming. And you have rather reasonable expectations for both elements that were raised with the arrival of new technology.
That they now hold to those new standards is not their fault for being too picky.
That is my issue as well. You never see Nintendo claiming footage is a gameplay trailer on a prototype. Ubisoft's marketing on Far Cry 3 and Watch Dogs is not right in any form. The Division is going to be next.Their marketing is based on lies, they reveal trailers that they know they wont rach nearly as whats being showed, and in gameplay form. Thats not right.
My bank account looks great these days, and I happen to be fortunate enough to have purchased a new-gen system. On my new-gen systems I expect games to run at the very least 1080p which is why I have little interest in Xbox One's current offerings. While all the games I own, or intend to own on the Playstation 4 are 1080p, it's just as important to deliver at the very least full-hd native resolution on a kit of hardware released in late 2013. Resolution is a number, just like 46 is a number, the number of pounds you ask for your game. All those numbers are valid aspects of how much I think a product is worth. In my case, as a responsible consumer, value is everything. Exploration of prices and offers are everything. You want to have my patronage, but you want me to pay a full price for something that does not correspond to the least of my expectations. I tend to look at products that compete with yours, open world games that have all the effects on and it's unbelievable. I do not compare it with corridor shooters because I'm not an idiot. Are you insinuating your clients are stupid? I hope not. Those games are capable of running on the same hardware you are publishing yours on and have a similar number of dynamic elements that are happening in every frame. They have to deal with the same type of performance costs but were still able to provide a product that was capable of rendering a full HD image with great lighting that looks much better than anything you've unveiled so far.
20 is just a number, but it's the biggest number of pounds you should expect to receive from me unless you fix the technical flaws in your product.
Don't expect a steady framerate on PC.
Where does microsoft keep getting these weird resolutions lol?
Oh man...And to think, some of you guys thought the game would run at 1080p 60fps on PS4....
Nope, sorry bud but I I have owned a PS4 since launch.
Nothing I have played on my PS4 has seriously impressed me yet...
Idk whats so weird about 792, 900p is weird too.
It doesn't even look nearly as good as Infamous. AC4 ran at 1080p on PS4 without a hitch. Is The Division going to be 720p/25fps at this point?
You are just the classiest of dudes.And to think, some of you guys thought the game would run at 1080p 60fps on PS4....
Haha!
Damn, I thought NeoGaf was better than this.....
Haha!
900p (1600x900) is a resolution that actually is the native resolution of some monitors, 792p does not afaik.Idk whats so weird about 792, 900p is weird too.
Watch the PC version be an unoptimized piece of shit.
Then the PC players will complain as well
Watch the PC version be an unoptimized piece of shit.
Then the PC players will complain as well
Watch the PC version be an unoptimized piece of shit.
Then the PC players will complain as well
Not anymore. A lot of punks ruining an in essence perfectly good forum these days.Damn, I thought NeoGaf was better than this.....
inFamous isn't really a traditional open world game though. The city is very empty, nearly no pedestrians or cars, no routines for any of the AI, and so on. It looks very pretty and is incredibly fun but it can't really be compared in the same way.
Idk whats so weird about 792, 900p is weird too.
Posting again for the new page..Shahid where art thou?
Fucked up. Hoping for that 1080p patch then, like ACIV.
Damn, I thought NeoGaf was better than this.....
Count me out Ubi, even for PC. Maybe don't repeat this with The Division, okay?
I doubt it as much as i hope it.maybe a post-release patch is released like a few other games.
And to think, some of you guys thought the game would run at 1080p 60fps on PS4....
inFamous isn't really a traditional open world game though. The city is very empty, nearly no pedestrians or cars, no routines for any of the AI, and so on. It looks very pretty and is incredibly fun but it can't really be compared in the same way.
Welcome to "Next Gen" enjoy the next ~5 years guys.
People buy new systems and have certain standards raised by the assumed expectations related to the new technology. It happens all the time. People move on, and have trouble playing the older looking games because they're ugly to them now, even though they previously thought they were attractive.
People spent an entire gen playing sub 1080p games and barely 30fps titles, and many games failed to even hit 720p.
It's perfectly reasonable for someone who spends $400 or $500 on a console to want to make sure that the game runs at full HD resolution and a reasonable framerate, because guess what? That also impacts gameplay. It's not just, visual, even though it also impacts that. So you have something that impacts both gameplay and visuals, both elements which are vitally important to gaming. And you have rather reasonable expectations for both elements that were raised with the arrival of new technology.
That they now hold to those new standards is not their fault for being too picky. Because on top of it all, both Sony and Microsoft have advertised their systems as offering a full 1080p experience now. Except, as we can see, many games are again failing to past muster. So, blame Sony and Microsoft for raising expectations, blame the reasonable raising of standards with new technology, and put it all in a potent mix - but gamers do not need to be ashamed for it. They SHOULD push back. Settle for less is not in a lot of our lexicons.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!
What a fucking joke this is!
I sure hope my experience will not be negatively impacted playing this at 1440p@60fps.
It sucks that we PC gamers lose a lot of that "cinematic" feel that is only available on these next-gen systems.
The division looked better graphically than watch dogs in every single conceivable way. Plus it has legit multiplayer with open world pvp zones etc. It will probably be 720p 30 fps on both ps4 and xbone.
I'm pretty sure he's talking about Indie games here.
Calm down, buddy.AHAHAHAHAHAHA!
What a fucking joke this is!
I sure hope my experience will not be negatively impacted playing this at 1440p@60fps.
It sucks that we PC gamers lose a lot of that "cinematic" feel that is only available on these next-gen systems.
I chuckled :/And to think, some of you guys thought the game would run at 1080p 60fps on PS4....
id highly recommend you look within Sony' first party offerings if you need any reason to help justify you PS4 purchase.
There are lots of pedestrians and cars, it was also made by a small team compared to Ubi and it's one of the most beautiful games ever on any platform. But it's exclusive and it doesn't focus on parity with an inferior platform.
Get that MisterXMedia fanboy bullshit out of here, fucking hell...And to think, some of you guys thought the game would run at 1080p 60fps on PS4....