Because the graphics aren't exactly stellar. 900p by itself sucks but if it has good textures and overall graphics behind it isn't the end of the world. This game looks ok graphically now. At least in comparison. They dropped the ball hard.
Might still be 1080p 60fps on ps4.
http://www.nowgamer.com/news/2394596/watch_dogs_is_1080p_60fps_on_ps4_says_ubisoft.html
Nah you're fine. You settle for less which is not a big deal. Some people want the best.
Hmmm golem vs. a ubisoft blog written by a dev?
Might still be 1080p 60fps on ps4.
http://www.nowgamer.com/news/2394596/watch_dogs_is_1080p_60fps_on_ps4_says_ubisoft.html
In a thread about resolution/frame rates (and on an enthusiast gaming forum) I think it's pretty obvious that you should see expect to see people who care about that type of thing discussing about it.
On a side note, I'd argue that higher frame rates make a game more fun to play due to better responsiveness between the player and the game.
Might still be 1080p 60fps on ps4.
http://www.nowgamer.com/news/2394596/watch_dogs_is_1080p_60fps_on_ps4_says_ubisoft.html
To increase the resolution and double the framerate? haha no.Maybe Day 1 patch like Asscreed4
These people should buy PCs.
I reckon a 4770k with 770 will easily hit 60FPS with maybe some reduction to the enthusiast settings like MXAA. Blanketing statements like that is just wrong when it is highly possible.good luck getting this game to run at 60 FPS locked on pc bro
maybe if you play it on low settings at 720p then maybe
Haha this comment is gold. Yes lets delay a game that is due to release this month because people counting pixels are upset. This is what happens when a generation of hardcore enthusiasts want better graphics, the systems required need to be beefier which just isn't feasible. That's why consoles are far more popular because they are cheaper, so the tech won't be as great as a PC that the user can throw cash at. If you want the high quality, go PC, simple as that.Just delay this until they get it right.
900p is almost %50 less pixels!, and 792p? what the hell was new generation of consoles for?!
To increase the resolution and double the framerate? haha no.
I reckon a 4770k with 770 will easily hit 60FPS with maybe some reduction to the enthusiast settings like MXAA. Blanketing statements like that is just wrong when it is highly possible.
Haha this comment is gold. Yes lets delay a game that is due to release this month because people counting pixels are upset. This is what happens when a generation of hardcore enthusiasts want better graphics, the systems required need to be beefier which just isn't feasible. That's why consoles are far more popular because they are cheaper, so the tech won't be as great as a PC that the user can throw cash at. If you want the high quality, go PC, simple as that.
good luck getting this game to run at 60 FPS locked on pc bro
maybe if you play it on low settings at 720p then maybe
Again, the bar was raised by games like Infamous: Second Son, so it's normal that people are expecting 1080p to be the standard for PS4.
all large with a drink and a apple pie alsoWhat the fuck is 782p? The cost in England of a large Big Mac and fries?
Well 1080p isn't supposed to be the high quality.IIf you want the high quality, go PC, simple as that.
I would have been perfectly fine with 1080p/30.
Watch it run 1080p30 on Wii U but with a lot less going on and people misinterpret it and go like "OMG EVEN THE WII U CAN RUN IT 1080P stupid Ubi!!!!"
Haha this comment is gold. Yes lets delay a game that is due to release this month because people counting pixels are upset. This is what happens when a generation of hardcore enthusiasts want better graphics, the systems required need to be beefier which just isn't feasible. That's why consoles are far more popular because they are cheaper, so the tech won't be as great as a PC that the user can throw cash at. If you want the high quality, go PC, simple as that.
Also people keep forgetting this is an open world game, it can be rather demanding to get things looking pretty, hell GTA V used some voodoo magic to get it looking how it is on PS3/X360. Personally gameplay > graphics for me because I'd rather enjoy the actual game than be like "wow this is pretty but terribly boring." Hopefully that is exactly what the delay was about, fixing up the game so it is fun, which from all the trailers and gameplay it looks to be.
Uh... so yeah, PC.
PC it is then
high profile ubisoft games really should be played on the PC, i say this as a console user
How many months optimizing and they can't hit 1080p.
At sub 1080p, I really do think GTAV looks comparable.
Eh, I'll be playing on PC anyway.
Glad i'm getting it on PC.
I won't be getting 60fps, though. Hell, I don't think many PC players will.
Not buying it.
This game was delayed for months and even after that they couldn't deliver 1080p, and we have inFamous Second Son, a better looking game, running at 1080p @~45fps.
Watchdogs is a cross-generation game, should be running at 1080p and constant 30fps at least on PS4, because the console already proved that can run the thing. If people put their hands down to this lack of commitment from devs in the first 6 months of the new consoles, its better keep expectations low for next games.
That's the problem with EA: they delivered a incomplete game like BF4, full of bugs, with DLC dated before caring about fix the game. People paid for BF4, and EA next game was even more incomplete: Titanfall.
Konami releases a prologue at inflated prices.
Now Ubisoft published a periodic table detailing the different editions of WatchDogs and you notice that you have to pay 150$ to have the real full game, the 60$ is a mutilated version with a lot of content removed. All this for a cross-gen game that is not even running at the same resolution of another better looking games.
The truth is people dictate how things should work, all that Microsoft 180º happened because people stood up. Sony changed Driveclub Plus version because people stood up. Watchdogs selling loads of copies on PS4 will show to Ubisoft that is OK to release the next Titanfall with even less content, the next prologue at full-price tag...
Not buying it.
This game was delayed for months and even after that they couldn't deliver 1080p, and we have inFamous Second Son, a better looking game, running at 1080p @~45fps.
Watchdogs is a cross-generation game, should be running at 1080p and constant 30fps at least on PS4, because the console already proved that can run the thing. If people put their hands down to this lack of commitment from devs in the first 6 months of the new consoles, its better keep expectations low for next games.
That's the problem with EA: they delivered a incomplete game like BF4, full of bugs, with DLC dated before caring about fix the game. People paid for BF4, and EA next game was even more incomplete: Titanfall.
Konami releases a prologue at inflated prices.
Now Ubisoft published a periodic table detailing the different editions of WatchDogs and you notice that you have to pay 150$ to have the real full game, the 60$ is a mutilated version with a lot of content removed. All this for a cross-gen game that is not even running at the same resolution of another better looking games.
The truth is people dictate how things should work, all that Microsoft 180º happened because people stood up. Sony changed Driveclub Plus version because people stood up. Watchdogs selling loads of copies on PS4 will show to Ubisoft that is OK to release the next Titanfall with even less content, the next prologue at full-price tag...
A last gen game running at 1080p 60fps wouldn't be all that amazingUbi is going to get slapped with GTA V at 1080p 60fps at E3.
Believe
Because the graphics aren't exactly stellar. 900p by itself sucks but if it has good textures and overall graphics behind it isn't the end of the world. This game looks ok graphically now. At least in comparison. They dropped the ball hard.
A last gen game running at 1080p 60fps wouldn't be all that amazing
Wellbin that case Watchdog is also releasing on PS3 and Xbox 360. So in a way it could have been port?A last gen game running at 1080p 60fps wouldn't be all that amazing
Nah you're fine. You settle for less which is not a big deal. Some people want the best.
Cross-gen/Last-gen same thing.A last gen game running at 1080p 60fps wouldn't be all that amazing
But that's more through good design than tech. I'm fairly certain that watchdogs has more polygons, better textures etc. etcGTA 5 looks pretty damm good when compared to WatchDogs imo.
Depends on if its just a straight port or a remastered version with new effects etc.Cross-gen/Last-gen same thing.
But that's more through good design than tech. I'm fairly certain that watchdogs has more polygons, better textures etc. etc.
Second son manages to pull off 1080 at 30fps upwards unlocked and still looks better than Watch Dogs,
New levels of incompetence reached for Ubi
A last gen game running at 1080p 60fps wouldn't be all that amazing