Freshmaker
I am Korean.
Lex Luthor (we all know this guy, tends to actually have the resources to acquire Kryptonite if it's actually available)
I'd rather pretend Lex never existed at this point.
Lex Luthor (we all know this guy, tends to actually have the resources to acquire Kryptonite if it's actually available)
Will google give me his pitch for how this translates into fun gameplay? Can I have that link please?
I was responding to a post that said how writers have been pulling off good superman stories for years so the games should just draw from that and everything will work out fine. I agree with you in theory but still not seeing a good pitch for how superman would work as a game character. Really, it isn't impossible but it's clearly no simple task either.It's more of a suggestion for a setting. I don't see why a Superman game needs to focus on one particular story, instead of drawing on the good aspects of many like the Markham games.
For example, name another successful action based video game with a character more powerful than superman. And don't say saints row iv because nothing In that game even remotely compares to what superman can do
i said name a character remotely comparable in abilities to superman. Hulk can't even fly or move at super speed, 2 of the biggest hurdles in designing a fun superman game. And those are just 2. Hulk doesn't even compare in sheer power to multitudes of other powerful game characters. He's a baby compared to superman. Supes would tear him to shreds without breaking a sweat.The Incredible: Hulk Ultimate Destruction (PS2/XBox/NGC). Superman doesn't have to be at max power at all times, either through the player switching power-levels in real-time or through contextual power levels (levels indoors won't let the player destroy the floor, fighting humans uses less power than fighting metabeings). Hulk is more of any anti-hero in the game than Superman would be, but making environmental destruction something the player wants to avoid while giving them enough tools to realistically do so would be feasible. Not easy, but possible.
i said name a character remotely comparable in abilities to superman. Hulk can't even fly or move at super speed, 2 of the biggest hurdles in designing a fun superman game.
I edited in a mention of the Superman Returns game which lets Superman fly or move at super speed. The demo I played of that was pretty fun as far as movement goes.
Does he fight enemies while flying?
Exactly, the full game itself wasn't fun. Wether that's down to inherent problematic design with superman himself or it being a bad game I can't say. All I'm saying is I haven't seen a fun game with a character who has powers equal or Better than superman. I'm not saying it's impossible. Id love to see it done. The best suggestions I've seen so far would be a Clark kent investigation game or simply taking away supermans powers. I like the suggestion of making it a metroid style game where he slowly regains his powers and eventually takes on braniac. Actually, that's not too far removed from smallville.I edited in a mention of the Superman Returns game which lets Superman fly or move at super speed. The demo I played of that was pretty fun as far as movement goes. There's also unreleased The Flash prototype game which would've had the player flying through a city at high speeds. Just search for the vid on Youtube.
Exactly, the full game itself wasn't fun. Wether that's down to inherent problematic design with superman himself or it being a bad game I can't say. All I'm saying is I haven't seen a fun game with a character who has powers equal or Better than superman. I'm not saying it's impossible. Id love to see it done.
There are better suggestions than those in the thread. Still, nothing anyone says or the examples they provide will make up for your lack of imagination.The best suggestions I've seen so far would be a Clark kent investigation game or simply taking away supermans powers. I like the suggestion of making it a metroid style game where he slowly regains his powers and eventually takes on braniac. Actually, that's not too far removed from smallville.
i said name a character remotely comparable in abilities to superman. Hulk can't even fly or move at super speed, 2 of the biggest hurdles in designing a fun superman game. And those are just 2. Hulk doesn't even compare in sheer power to multitudes of other powerful game characters. He's a baby compared to superman. Supes would tear him to shreds without breaking a sweat.
Have to stick to the precedent set by the movies, I guess.
You haven't been keeping up with the Hulk. On the upper anger levels, he's strong enough to hold tectonic plates together while swimming in magma.
i actually said it could be that superman returns is just a bad game. Then I said it don't think it's impossible to make a good superman game. I said that. In the Post you just quoted. Then I said I liked some of the ideas in the thread, to which you replied by insulting me. Classy! Great posting! Very constructive.You'll need to be able to break down Superman Returns: The Game and figure out what exactly wasn't fun and why. Otherwise, you'll conflate bad design decisions making the game bad with "playing as Superman in a game is bad."
There are better suggestions than those in the thread. Still, nothing anyone says or the examples they provide will make up for your lack of imagination.
All I said was that there are better suggestions for a superman game so far in the thread that don't make compromises. I was also using a general "you" when I saidi actually said it could be that superman returns is just a bad game. Then I said it don't think it's impossible to make a good superman game. I said that. In the Post you just quoted. Then I said I liked some of the ideas in the thread, to which you replied by insulting me. Classy! Great posting! Very constructive.
you'll conflate bad design decisions making the game bad with "playing as Superman in a game is bad."
Ha. I wondered if anybody else noticed that.unrelated, but I can't get over the idea of Curtis Mayfield and Stevie Wonder passively-aggressively arguing with each other over Superman games. It amuses me to no end.
They should have you play as a young kal-el just getting his powers, that way there's an excuse to leave you vulnerable, and as you progress through the game you get new powers. Then the end/post-game is god mode where you can fly around and do anything. Having you start as beast superman from the beginning is going to cripple the canon/and or challenge.
Give an example of a comic story or cartoon script or even an episode of smallville that translates to a fun game and I'm on board.
Will google give me his pitch for how this translates into fun gameplay? Can I have that link please?
Aaaaah lighten up.
Give an example of a comic story or cartoon script or even an episode of smallville that translates to a fun game and I'm on board.
Nobody does Superman right.
hes a comic hero from the 1930s that people keep trying to portray in modern times and he simply just dosnt fit.
I always thought there was too much "Superman vs bad guy/weapons" in the games. Superman has to stop disasters, too.
I liked the premise of Superman Returns , although I couldn't stand the game to play through it all. I feel they had the idea, but didn't make a fun enough game. But still, when I think of a fun Superman game, I think of him not only fighting Zod and Braniac and other super-powered baddies, but stopping a train wreck, saving people from drowing when a ship sinks, saving a plane from crashing, stopping a tornado, diverting a river or funneling its water over a raging city fire, etc. Superman would be full-powered from level 1 - but you'd need to learn how to use those powers.
I also think of the pre-crisis comics where he'd travel into the 30th century and battle alongside the Legion of Super-Heroes. That'd be an awesome level.
Superman was created by a Canadian and thats all you really need to know about why hes such a lame super hero. Batman is the only worthwhile thing DC has.
Nobody does Superman right...
I want to say that this game wasnt bad?
Have to stick to the precedent set by the movies, I guess.
That's wrong. It's simply factually incorrect. .
Considering you are refuting his OPINION, you cannot say it is FACTUALLY anything, because it's a damn opinion in the first place.