My bad, maybe there are some ps4 issues then.
or maybe theres no issues and PC is just the version that most sites got from the publisher?
My bad, maybe there are some ps4 issues then.
My bad, maybe there are some ps4 issues then.
Strange there are no ps4 reviews. Makes me wonder if that version has some issues.
Edited for accuracy.
I will be playing the PS4 version shortly so I'll update with how it seems.
tearing pls be gone.... :/
the IGN review is really bad, he kept on comparing it to dark souls like its the successor or related to that franchise.
They offered me all 3 versions if I wanted them(because I do many reviews testing on all machines) and didn't seem to have an issue with it. But ya it does seem odd.
the IGN review is really bad, he kept on comparing it to dark souls like its the successor or related to that franchise.
Lords of the Fallen looks a lot like Dark Souls, but doesn't reach its superb quality. It's still a good game, especially for gamers looking for a challenging Action RPG.
Reasonably taxing game, looks really good too. From the look of it the game justifies its hardware demands.Maybe we should make a performance thread for the game:
Much more here:
http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/lords-of-the-fallen-test-gpu.html
Engine caching, as it should be.Some interesting bits, game will use 16 cpu threads if avalible, and seem to take advantage of all the vram on the gpu even at 1080p
This seems like how Dark Souls 2 would've reviewed if it didn't have the name attached, so it's probably an alright game.
The Dark Souls comparison is unwarranted. It still looks like a fun action RPG in its own right.
Still, the comparison is unavoidable, I guess.
Its a good game for those who can't stand Dark Souls' difficulty.
Bamco published it so maybe that was their intention and target market for this game: for the crowd who wanted a easier Dark Souls!
I think it looks fun.
PC Gamer have it a 58. They said the game was good but a technical mess.
http://www.pcgamer.com/lords-of-the-fallen-review/
Lords of the Fallen is a decent action RPG. LordsOfTheFallen.exe, on the other hand, has stopped working. Lords of the Fallen has interesting, fun combat, and when that giant multi-stage boss only needs one more hit to kill, LordsOfTheFallen.exe has stopped working. LordsOfTheFallen.exe is a vile, cruel bastard, worse than any boss in Lords of the Fallen.
PC Gamer have it a 58. They said the game was good but a technical mess.
http://www.pcgamer.com/lords-of-the-fallen-review/
As someone else mentioned, unfortunate with the crashes, but this dude apparently played on shitty specs on "recommended" and then complains about poor performance and crashes. He hasn't got the day 1 patch either, so reviewing it like this seems unfair, especially considering he gave BF4 a good score even though BF4 is notorious for being a "crash fest". That's not biased at all.
Next polish site review:
http://ppe.pl/recenzje-1241-recenzja_gry__lords_of_the_fallen.html
8/10
Not bad.
Edit:
Eurogamer PL
8/10 too.
Sad day when my GPU doesn't even appear on the benchmark list anymore (560ti). ;_;7Maybe we should make a performance thread for the game:
Much more here:
http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/lords-of-the-fallen-test-gpu.html
Some interesting bits, game will use 16 cpu threads if avalible, and seem to take advantage of all the vram on the gpu even at 1080p
Developer is German, publisher is Polish.is it just me or does this seem a little biased?
true. a lot of these reviews are comparing the game to Souls in the same way Driveclub was compared to Forza Horizon 2 for not being open world.Some of these reviews seem to be knocking it because it's not as hard as Dark Souls. Pretty stupid reason to dock points.
Some of these reviews seem to be knocking it because it's not as hard as Dark Souls. Pretty stupid reason to dock points.
It is incredibly similar, at worst your performance is 10% worse, if even that. So at Very High settings your average fps will be a bit above 30, if you have the CPU listed.Sad day when my GPU doesn't even appear on the benchmark list anymore (560ti). ;_;7
I think it'll be fairly similar to the 750ti.
Well, if I had 32GB RAM and an i7 5960x, I suppose.It is incredibly similar, at worst your performance is 10% worse, if even that. So at Very High settings your average fps will be a bit above 30.
Because of a 300 million dollars marketing difference. Because the publisher of Destiny is one of the biggest videogame companies in the world, and the publisher of Lords of the Fallen is a tiny B-tier pubby from Eastern Europe. Because the last game by the developer of Destiny was motherfucking Halo, and the last game by the developer of Lords of the Fallen was Moorhuhn: Tiger & Chicken.So why isn't this thread 200 pages considering it has the same score as of this post as Destiny?
Some of these reviews seem to be knocking it because it's not as hard as Dark Souls. Pretty stupid reason to dock points.
Undisputed GOATthe last game by the developer of Lords of the Fallen was Moorhuhn: Tiger & Chicken.