blitzcloud
Banned
I'm gonna act for a second like those claiming downgrade:
WOW, downgrade. nathan looks flat.
![iRoAmp0A29r71.png](http://i.minus.com/iRoAmp0A29r71.png)
WOW, downgrade. nathan looks flat.
If this was a Ubisoft game it would be getting torn apart.
Cutscene model vs. in-game model.
Different lighting conditions.
The images of the left were never going to be representative of how the game would look with multiple NPCs, each with AI, during traversal or combat.
Looks like the cop dad from Arrow.
Anybody else think the older brother kind of looks like Detective Lance from Arrow?
The images of the left were never going to be representative of how the game would look with multiple NPCs, each with AI, during traversal or combat.
This thread is full of crazy people.
The game looks absolutely stunning. After all is said and done it's going to be one of the best graphical showcases in gaming history, mark my words.
Are you even sure the hair has been changed? You're looking at two different lighting conditions, and I'm not at all convinced the model is different other than the removal of the cut on the forehead. I really feel like a lot of people who have no clue what they're talking about are trying to play the downgrade card here. At least I have the honesty to state I'm no graphics expert. However, I don't think there is anything conclusive enough for you to make this claim. You simply can't see the geometry of the hair outside of silhouette. And frankly, the silhouette looks the same save for alpha blending/aliasing. PEACE.Yikes at the hair. There's definitely a downgrade there... And I say downgrade cuz the E3 reveal was supposed to be in-game footgae, right?? Everything else on today's video like the skin texture continues looking really good though
Yikes at the hair. There's definitely a downgrade there... And I say downgrade cuz the E3 reveal was supposed to be in-game footgae, right?? Everything else on today's video like the skin texture continues looking really good though
This thread is full of crazy people.
The game looks absolutely stunning. After all is said and done it's going to be one of the best graphical showcases in gaming history, mark my words.
Have to admit, not really impressed with those screens in comparison with E3 model.
Right now, I think I would give the node to TRE.
Here is hoping that we see some improvements with time.
Here is hoping that we see some improvements with time.
I really feel like a lot of people who have no clue what they're talking about are trying to play the downgrade card here. PEACE.
Did they gave up the 60 fps dream? Bummer.
I liked what I saw because I already love Uncharted, but huge areas for the gun fight aren't exactly new to the franchise. UC3 already sported huge arenas.
Has Naughty Dog confirmed if we are dealing with a semi open Uncharted here? The final scene suggests so, but I would love confirmation that the world is semi open like in Tomb Raider.
I'm gonna act for a second like those claiming downgrade:
![]()
WOW, downgrade. nathan looks flat.
Have to admit, not really impressed with those screens in comparison with E3 model.
Right now, I think I would give the node to TRE.
Here is hoping that we see some improvements with time.
"Different lighting"... Is this the new go-to?
Game looks good (very good) but some of you have to face the facts. Naughty Dog has done the same thing before, too, though usually only with screen shots so it's not like this is new. And those that expect a doubling of framerate? C'mon
When its done i agree but right now it doesn't look that great. I dont see how people are crazy for saying that.
Has Naughty Dog confirmed if we are dealing with a semi open Uncharted here? The final scene suggests so, but I would love confirmation that the world is semi open like in Tomb Raider.
Wait, what? Are you saying this looks worse than the last tomb raider game?
You can't name a single fact about this game. Humor me, tell me one of the technical differences between the teaser and new trailer. A graphics artist would spot the differences immediately, they have trained eyes. You've not stated anything to suggest you have any expertise on the matter. I'm not sure you should be telling people to face facts you don't possess. I've really grown tired of the instant overreactions. PEACE."Different lighting"... Is this the new go-to?
Game looks good (very good) but some of you have to face the facts. Naughty Dog has done the same thing before, too, though usually only with screen shots so it's not like this is new. And those that expect a doubling of framerate? C'mon
Wait, what? Are you saying this looks worse than the last tomb raider game?
Well I for one can see that scenario-wise it needs more work. But the model is identical, albeit some aliasing issues that might be because of the stage the game is in. Also the illumination conditions are so different that claiming downgrade is not even possible in reasonable terms. The hair has aliasing, specially on the scenes where the DOF effect appears, outlining the aliased jawlines.well the level of discourse here certainly went down the gutter. there is not enough grass on that picture to built this strawman.
The combat areas look much much more open then TR by a long shot.
People on GAF are shitting in the graphics? Oh that's swell. Game looks borderline real if you ask me.
So the game is no longer going to be 60fps? It's a shame Naughty Dog teased such a thing.
Reserving final judgment because YouTube suck but at the moment I'm not impressed
Repost for the new page
![]()
Some of you people are so damn clueless. It's idiotic to compare E3 cutscene model to the gameplay model in the current video. There's no downgrade if you look at the cutscene.
![]()
"Different lighting"... Is this the new go-to?
Game looks good (very good) but some of you have to face the facts. Naughty Dog has done the same thing before, too, though usually only with screen shots so it's not like this is new. And those that expect a doubling of framerate? C'mon