• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

1 Month Later, Halo: MCC is still broken

Jomjom

Banned
Why do you need to keep hassling them? The game is still broken and Frankie make it clear anyone who wanted a refund could get one.

In large corporations communication is never that great, especially when it gets down to the lowest rung on the ladder, CS. I would think few if anyone in CS actually know who Frankie is or what he has said. So people who want refunds are kind of on their own to get their refunds.

But yeah it sucks that anyone HAS to do this to get their refund, but the sad reality is that oftentimes that's what is necessary when dealing with CS. They aren't that informed and the only thing they really understand is dollars and cents. When you've cost them more than the amount you are asking for in return, it's more logical to simply give you what you want.
 

Crayon

Member
It's especially annoying to RE-buy a game that was already good to then find out it's been messed up. Sorry for everyone who has been let down by this so far and I hope that 343 sticks with it.
 

Jeff-DSA

Member
I have lost faith in 343 as game developers and not plan on buying Halo 5 at launch or if ever if the same problems occur. Sold off my copy of MCC.

I sold mine and I'll buy it used when it's sub-$30. I'm not investing any more time and money into this until I know it's working 100% reliably. So yeah, I probably won't revisit this game until the spring.

As far as I'm concerned, Halo 5 is the last chance for 343. If Halo 5 underwhelms or is plagued with issues, I'm done with Halo until a new developer gets a crack at handling the franchise.
 
It's especially annoying to RE-buy a game that was already good to then find out it's been messed up. Sorry for everyone who has been let down by this so far and I hope that 343 sticks with it.

No one will let them live this down so I assume they will keep at it :)
 

MrMatt555

Member
I just hope this is a lesson to the people working on the inevitable Marcus Fenix Collection. Do NOT Outsource!
 

Euron

Member
I sold mine and I'll buy it used when it's sub-$30. I'm not investing any more time and money into this until I know it's working 100% reliably. So yeah, I probably won't revisit this game until the spring.

As far as I'm concerned, Halo 5 is the last chance for 343. If Halo 5 underwhelms or is plagued with issues, I'm done with Halo until a new developer gets a crack at handling the franchise.
I don't even know if I can make it that far. In my eyes, 343 has disappointed three times: Halo Anniversary (broken online co-op and barebones multiplayer), Halo 4 (too many things to list), and MCC (everything discussed in this thread). Thankfully, I waited and didn't but an Xbox One for the MCC. I gave them two weeks and that obviously wasn't enough.

Halo 5 is make or break for the franchise. Hell, in a way it will be make or break for the Xbox Brand in my opinion. If MS completely fucks up its biggest series, what does that say about their brand? They don't really have another franchise to fall back on aside from Gears which may suffer the same fate as Halo with a different developer.

At this point, I wonder if 343 will want to distance themselves even further from classic Halo, citing the universal disappointment with the MCC as an example. But at least we know Halo 5 will get a 9.5 or higher from IGN, given that 4 got a 9.8 and the MCC got a 9 so 343 has that going for them.

At this point, if I do buy an Xbox One down the line, it'll be for Banjo, Crackdown, and possibly Gears, with Halo as a bonus.
 

jelly

Member
With hindsight, it should have been Halo 2A only with all maps but 343 probably thought that was a weak offering that wouldn't reach far beyond die hards.

Looking at MCC, there isn't much care and attention. They slapped together four games with a thought here and there to make something great but if your aiming that high, do it right.

Halo CEA needs redone to match the original. The instant switch is neat but for the sake of fidelity and performance, no way, make it a stand alone option.

This collection shouldn't be a spit and polish with gaffer tape. Improve the performance, redo character models and other assets, make the repetitive sections of Halo CE more varied, 60fps animations, improve FoV. Redo the online code so it works better. Trim the fat and replace different game iterations of features. Make one Halo Forge and Community that encompasses everything like Garry's Mod that only gets bigger and better with every new game. Go the extra mile with the aim for the long term, not that next map pack or Halo game.

Halo Collection equals one community, one launcher, one Forge, one multiplayer portal, every game.
 
I'll just post my transcript. Why not? My patience grew fairly thin since this is my second time attempting this and I was promised one the first time I did.



tl;dr:
-Promised a refund by a previous agent, he had said that there was an issue with the system but that I could get one once they fixed it
-Contacted support again
-Blamed 343, said I need to ask them for a refund
-After showing the NeoGAF post from Frankie, still no refund
-Said even though the previous agent promised one, still no refund
-Doesn't know how much a PS4 runs

I edited it out for length, but they also claimed phone support follows the same guidelines and wouldn't be able to give me a refund.

Jesus Christ, you got some growin' to do, son. It's hilarious that you thought we would pat you on the back for this while we all collectively berate and give the middle finger to MS support agents in some sort of twisted customer solidarity.
 

dwells

Member
A month in and the game still hard crashes with an awful buzzing and screeching noise. They're still sticking by that "oh, we had no idea there were any problems before launch, it was perfect" line, huh?

Ridiculous. No refund for me because I went physical, even bought an Xbox One for it. Unbelievable that Microsoft themselves haven't commented on this, what with it being a flagship title that they continue to promote and advertise.

Way to not give a damn about your customers, guys.
 

Markitron

Is currently staging a hunger strike outside Gearbox HQ while trying to hate them to death
I am not a Halo fan, and haven't been following this situation. I had no idea it was BF4 levels of broken, from what I have read here it seems even worse. Would never have expected this from a Halo game.

Did the initial reviews reflect the state the game was in, and have there been any re-reviews?
 
Just another chapter to the book of embarrassment that is "gaming journalism". I thought it would have stopped by now how bent over gamers got the last year or two, but these sites just don't care and just want that money.

yup. you just cant trust "games journalism" anymore. they'll say anything for an easy buck

ring up. my friend spent 2 hours on service chat, and got it immediately when he phoned up.

but no one should have to spend 2 hours arguing over the phone over a simple game.

Right, because getting pissed off and abusing the rep obviously got you what you wanted, didn't it?

Slightly rude? You're embarrassing yourself.

Talk about a backfire. That dude didn't do anything to you and Microsoft certainly isn't stealing your money.

"Slightly" rude? You have a lot to learn about how to deal with people.

Give it a rest, you come off sounding like a prick there to the poor customer service agent who has nothing to do with this situation. Your anger is with MS and 343. Guys like you are the reason I'd never work retail or anything service related. I get you're upset and that you want a refund, but look how you went about it.

She was always polite and courteous. Fun fact, name dropping people does nothing. What does the customer service agent know about Frank O Connor or linking to a forum post? They have to use official guidelines and what is posted to their twitter or Halo Waypoint or internal decisions.

Learn to take your anger out on the right people, damn. Of course there will be push back, it's now a month since launch and you want a refund. It was easy for a lot of folks within the first week. Often times, Xbox Support is understaffed usually by workers in other countries who are not 100% sure about anything.

this is soo sad. hatchtag you deserve better treatment than this. i'm appalled and embarrassed by these reactions.
 

Shpeshal Nick

aka Collingwood
Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.

I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.

The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.

Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine

Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.

Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.
 
Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.

I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.

The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.

Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine

Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.

Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.

Who are you to guarantee anything?
 

Grisby

Member
Yeah, it's the most disappointing release of the year. Kinda dropped the MP for a bit cause I cant just wait around for matches. I'll pick it back up another month or two when more patches have come.

343's apologies were nice, but they shouldn't have released a game like this. The quality of the game fell under their watch, but I'm sure they've heard that a billion different ways from Sunday by now. Hopefully, they heed the replies this next time.
 
Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.

I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.

The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.

Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine

Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.

Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.
Pretty cold comfort, and I can't really even give a fuck about who's to blame. You know where the buck stops? You know who's the final authority? The final people accountable? Yep, 343i. It's their rep on the line, not Saber/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front. And they took a shit all over it by releasing a game they had to know was fucked up.

They'll get no pre-order from me. They taught me my lesson. I'll wait a few days for impressions from real gamers.
 

Shpeshal Nick

aka Collingwood
Who are you to guarantee anything?

Because I'd like to think I think a little more rationally and logically than most on here that tend to overreact?

While there is no excuse for the way MCC launched, I can see why there are problems with it. But I can also see that 343 have a history with issues when they outsource games.

Halo 5, like Halo 4 is not outsourced. Halo 5 will also use the dedicated servers. The only other game at the moment to use them is Titanfall and Titanfall doesn't have problems either. Seriously, when you look at all the information available to you and think rationally, all signs point to Halo 5 being a completely working game day one.

Will it be a good game? That's what is up for debate.
 

BriGuy

Member
With hindsight, it should have been Halo 2A only with all maps but 343 probably thought that was a weak offering that wouldn't reach far beyond die hards.
I agree with you, but it wasn't 343's call, it was Microsoft's. If you believe the rumors, MCC was originally supposed to just be an updated Halo 2. The inclusion of the other titles was decided at a later time. It would explain a lot if it was true.
 

Jigolo

Member
Because I'd like to think I think a little more rationally and logically than most on here that tend to overreact?

While there is no excuse for the way MCC launched, I can see why there are problems with it. But I can also see that 343 have a history with issues when they outsource games.

Halo 5, like Halo 4 is not outsourced. Halo 5 will also use the dedicated servers. The only other game at the moment to use them is Titanfall and Titanfall doesn't have problems either. Seriously, when you look at all the information available to you and think rationally, all signs point to Halo 5 being a completely working game day one.

Will it be a good game? That's what is up for debate.

But this game is supposed to have dedicated servers. So 343i was lying as well?

When asked if the collection could come to Xbox 360, he replied, “We are dedicated to bringing a full and fun experience to Halo: The Master Chief Collection on Xbox One, providing you with dedicated servers, a unified interface, increased visual fidelity, and gameplay running at 60 fps.

http://www.vg247.com/2014/06/20/hal...ne-343-industries-shares-lots-of-new-details/
 
this is soo sad. hatchtag you deserve better treatment than this. i'm appalled and embarrassed by these reactions.

Having worked in customer service before, I will always side with customer service reps in a case of abusive and demanding customers. I know how much these people get paid, and I know exactly what they have to deal with on a daily basis.

The nicer you are to customer service reps, the more likely it is you will get what you want from them.
 
But this game is supposed to have dedicated servers. So 343i was lying as well?



http://www.vg247.com/2014/06/20/hal...ne-343-industries-shares-lots-of-new-details/

tumblr_m4rocyT1XD1rn95k2o1_500.gif


Such rationality, such logic.
 
Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.

I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.

The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.

Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine

Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.

Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.

Don't write checks your ass can't cash
 

darthbob

Member
It's like what Jeff Gerstmann said. "You are MICROSOFT. This is HALO. What the fuck is going on? Did the money run out?"

Imagine Nintendo launching a brand new Mario game and having it be this broken.

Having problems imaging that, eh?
 
i haven't touched this game since day 4. Fuck it, after the beta if it's still broken i'm going to demand a refund and i'm going to get it to. Watch.
 
Having worked in customer service before, I will always side with customer service reps in a case of abusive and demanding customers. I know how much these people get paid, and I know exactly what they have to deal with on a daily basis.

The nicer you are to customer service reps, the more likely it is you will get what you want from them.

but he did say that prior to that text exchange that he already spent quite some time with CS.

tell me honestly, if you, i, or anyone else were in his shoes, after spending maybe an hour or two pointlessly arguing with CS, you wouldn't start to begin losing your composure?
 

leng jai

Member
To be fair, if there's a game where you could feel safe pre-ordering it's probably the remake of one of the biggest IPs around backed by Microsoft.

Guess not this gen.
 

cluto

Member
Because I'd like to think I think a little more rationally and logically than most on here that tend to overreact?

So I'm officially done with Halo multiplayer until SWAT playlists come back. Take your nostalgia goggles off folks, its shit.

I can see now why Bungie and 343 tried to change it up. Problem is, they needed to realise popping shields was the problem. SWAT needs to be renamed Slayer Hardcore so people don't fear it. Its the only mode worth playing.

yZ8kAGi.jpg
 

Duxxy3

Member
Sold the game off to amazon. I played through the bug riddled campaigns, so I figure I got my $20 worth out of the game.
 

Madness

Member
yup. you just cant trust "games journalism" anymore. they'll say anything for an easy buck

but no one should have to spend 2 hours arguing over the phone over a simple game.

this is soo sad. hatchtag you deserve better treatment than this. i'm appalled and embarrassed by these reactions.

Save the outrage. Guy was misdirecting his anger at the wrong person and was called out for it. If you're embarrassed about our reactions, it says more about you than us.
 

Shpeshal Nick

aka Collingwood

I stand by that. The old way isn't fun. That's not an overreaction. As someone who has played Halo since 2001, but also played it's compeititors in between, after going back, it's highlighted how archaic the long TTK is in this day and age. I'll admit I was pissed off when I made that post, but my opinion even now in the cold light of day hasn't changed.

It's obviously better when there's no lag, but even then it's not as enjoyable as I remember it being back in 2004.

SWAT is still the best form of Halo there is (for me).
 

Tawpgun

Member
Game is SO fuckin good when it works though. So good I can deal with some of the bullshit. As of last time I played (before the latest patch which I heard makes the game decent now) I got more mad at AR starts than I did any uneven teams or crashing lol.

The biggest shame is it will tank the games population. I hope when (or if) the game is properly functional people will come back to play. This was supposed to be such an awesome experience, bringing back all the people I used to love playing Halo with and it just ended up being soul crushing

I stand by that. The old way isn't fun. That's not an overreaction. As someone who has played Halo since 2001, but also played it's compeititors in between, after going back, it's highlighted how archaic the long TTK is in this day and age.

SWAT is still the best form of Halo there is.

wat. Pls leave Halo alone. Why do you want to for Halo to play like every other shooter though? The time to kill is what gives it some uniqueness.

I personally love the way the game played. The time to kill lets players have much more interesting fights instead of aim, click, dead. It also makes it so you have a chance if someone shoots you first. Playing Halo 1-3 also made me appreciate how better the game feels without sprint.

SWAT is fun (stinkles will back you up on that) but its a niche gametype, albeit a popular one. Halo needs to remain true to what it is.
 

RdN

Member
Frankie came on here explaining exactly the issue.

He didn't. He said that the game is designed to fall back to P2P in case of problems. A post in a forum is hardly an official statement fron the company. What about those that doesn't come to neogaf? they are totally in the dark.

Not to mention that this was 1 month and 4 major updates ago.

What's going on? Why haven't they turned back yet? When can we expect them to come back?

If that's not shady, I don't know what is.
 
I stand by that. The old way isn't fun. That's not an overreaction. As someone who has played Halo since 2001, but also played it's compeititors in between, after going back, it's highlighted how archaic the long TTK is in this day and age. I'll admit I was pissed off when I made that post, but my opinion even now in the cold light of day hasn't changed.

It's obviously better when there's no lag, but even then it's not as enjoyable as I remember it being back in 2004.

SWAT is still the best form of Halo there is (for me).

You are the 1%
 
Yeah guys, 343i is totally responsible for this mess. I'm sure they lied to Microsoft and assure them the game was working properly and MS released the game. Totally 343i's fault.
 
Top Bottom