ProvenDeadly
Member
lol these posts are gold
Why do you need to keep hassling them? The game is still broken and Frankie make it clear anyone who wanted a refund could get one.
I have lost faith in 343 as game developers and not plan on buying Halo 5 at launch or if ever if the same problems occur. Sold off my copy of MCC.
It's especially annoying to RE-buy a game that was already good to then find out it's been messed up. Sorry for everyone who has been let down by this so far and I hope that 343 sticks with it.
I don't even know if I can make it that far. In my eyes, 343 has disappointed three times: Halo Anniversary (broken online co-op and barebones multiplayer), Halo 4 (too many things to list), and MCC (everything discussed in this thread). Thankfully, I waited and didn't but an Xbox One for the MCC. I gave them two weeks and that obviously wasn't enough.I sold mine and I'll buy it used when it's sub-$30. I'm not investing any more time and money into this until I know it's working 100% reliably. So yeah, I probably won't revisit this game until the spring.
As far as I'm concerned, Halo 5 is the last chance for 343. If Halo 5 underwhelms or is plagued with issues, I'm done with Halo until a new developer gets a crack at handling the franchise.
I'll just post my transcript. Why not? My patience grew fairly thin since this is my second time attempting this and I was promised one the first time I did.
tl;dr:
-Promised a refund by a previous agent, he had said that there was an issue with the system but that I could get one once they fixed it
-Contacted support again
-Blamed 343, said I need to ask them for a refund
-After showing the NeoGAF post from Frankie, still no refund
-Said even though the previous agent promised one, still no refund
-Doesn't know how much a PS4 runs
I edited it out for length, but they also claimed phone support follows the same guidelines and wouldn't be able to give me a refund.
I just hope this is a lesson to the people working on the inevitable Marcus Fenix Collection. Do NOT Outsource!
Just another chapter to the book of embarrassment that is "gaming journalism". I thought it would have stopped by now how bent over gamers got the last year or two, but these sites just don't care and just want that money.
ring up. my friend spent 2 hours on service chat, and got it immediately when he phoned up.
Right, because getting pissed off and abusing the rep obviously got you what you wanted, didn't it?
Slightly rude? You're embarrassing yourself.
Talk about a backfire. That dude didn't do anything to you and Microsoft certainly isn't stealing your money.
"Slightly" rude? You have a lot to learn about how to deal with people.
Give it a rest, you come off sounding like a prick there to the poor customer service agent who has nothing to do with this situation. Your anger is with MS and 343. Guys like you are the reason I'd never work retail or anything service related. I get you're upset and that you want a refund, but look how you went about it.
She was always polite and courteous. Fun fact, name dropping people does nothing. What does the customer service agent know about Frank O Connor or linking to a forum post? They have to use official guidelines and what is posted to their twitter or Halo Waypoint or internal decisions.
Learn to take your anger out on the right people, damn. Of course there will be push back, it's now a month since launch and you want a refund. It was easy for a lot of folks within the first week. Often times, Xbox Support is understaffed usually by workers in other countries who are not 100% sure about anything.
With hindsight, it should have been Halo 2A only with all maps but 343 probably thought that was a weak offering that wouldn't reach far beyond die hards.
Would never have expected this from a Halo game.
Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.
I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.
The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.
Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine
Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.
Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.
Pretty cold comfort, and I can't really even give a fuck about who's to blame. You know where the buck stops? You know who's the final authority? The final people accountable? Yep, 343i. It's their rep on the line, not Saber/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front. And they took a shit all over it by releasing a game they had to know was fucked up.Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.
I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.
The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.
Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine
Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.
Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.
Who are you to guarantee anything?
I agree with you, but it wasn't 343's call, it was Microsoft's. If you believe the rumors, MCC was originally supposed to just be an updated Halo 2. The inclusion of the other titles was decided at a later time. It would explain a lot if it was true.With hindsight, it should have been Halo 2A only with all maps but 343 probably thought that was a weak offering that wouldn't reach far beyond die hards.
Because I'd like to think I think a little more rationally and logically than most on here that tend to overreact?
While there is no excuse for the way MCC launched, I can see why there are problems with it. But I can also see that 343 have a history with issues when they outsource games.
Halo 5, like Halo 4 is not outsourced. Halo 5 will also use the dedicated servers. The only other game at the moment to use them is Titanfall and Titanfall doesn't have problems either. Seriously, when you look at all the information available to you and think rationally, all signs point to Halo 5 being a completely working game day one.
Will it be a good game? That's what is up for debate.
When asked if the collection could come to Xbox 360, he replied, We are dedicated to bringing a full and fun experience to Halo: The Master Chief Collection on Xbox One, providing you with dedicated servers, a unified interface, increased visual fidelity, and gameplay running at 60 fps.
this is soo sad. hatchtag you deserve better treatment than this. i'm appalled and embarrassed by these reactions.
But this game is supposed to have dedicated servers. So 343i was lying as well?
http://www.vg247.com/2014/06/20/hal...ne-343-industries-shares-lots-of-new-details/
Still amazed that people truly think Halo 5 will have problems.
I guarantee Halo 5 will launch without a single major hitch. 100%. As I've said many times, 343 don't have an issue launching agame themselves. Halo 4, for all it's flaws, was a completely solid working online experience and that's despite NO beta.
The problems only arise when 343 outsource. Again, only when they outsource.
Halo CE Anniversary (Sabre): Broken co-op
Halo MCC (Sabre/Ruffian/Certain Affinity/United Front): Just about broken everything
Halo 4 (343): Worked fine
Halo 5 won't have an issue. If you want to skip Halo 5 because you don't like the direction it's going, or because you don't think it will be any good, no worries. But to avoid Halo 5 because you think it might be broken too is being willfully ignorant and ignoring all the inof at your disposal.
Not only did 343 launch Halo 4 wihtout a problem, Halo 5 will have a beta almost a year out from the game's launch.
Amazing that the console's flagship is being treated this poorly.
It's like what Jeff Gerstmann said. "You are MICROSOFT. This is HALO. What the fuck is going on? Did the money run out?"
biting off more than they can chew, is what 343 was doing imo.
So the MCC doesn't have dedicated servers? For some reason I thought it did.
Having worked in customer service before, I will always side with customer service reps in a case of abusive and demanding customers. I know how much these people get paid, and I know exactly what they have to deal with on a daily basis.
The nicer you are to customer service reps, the more likely it is you will get what you want from them.
So the MCC doesn't have dedicated servers? For some reason I thought it did.
Don't pre order games.
#day2
But this game is supposed to have dedicated servers. So 343i was lying as well?
http://www.vg247.com/2014/06/20/hal...ne-343-industries-shares-lots-of-new-details/
I pre ordered the game too. This game has converted me into a day2er, except for Nintendo games.Tbh, alot of people who preordered the game didnt expect MCC to have a buggy online, especially after how polished Halo 4 was
It's supposed to have... But they never quite worked and 343i has been pretty shady in sharing any information about them.
Because I'd like to think I think a little more rationally and logically than most on here that tend to overreact?
So I'm officially done with Halo multiplayer until SWAT playlists come back. Take your nostalgia goggles off folks, its shit.
I can see now why Bungie and 343 tried to change it up. Problem is, they needed to realise popping shields was the problem. SWAT needs to be renamed Slayer Hardcore so people don't fear it. Its the only mode worth playing.
yup. you just cant trust "games journalism" anymore. they'll say anything for an easy buck
but no one should have to spend 2 hours arguing over the phone over a simple game.
this is soo sad. hatchtag you deserve better treatment than this. i'm appalled and embarrassed by these reactions.
I stand by that. The old way isn't fun. That's not an overreaction. As someone who has played Halo since 2001, but also played it's compeititors in between, after going back, it's highlighted how archaic the long TTK is in this day and age.
SWAT is still the best form of Halo there is.
Frankie came on here explaining exactly the issue.
I stand by that. The old way isn't fun. That's not an overreaction. As someone who has played Halo since 2001, but also played it's compeititors in between, after going back, it's highlighted how archaic the long TTK is in this day and age. I'll admit I was pissed off when I made that post, but my opinion even now in the cold light of day hasn't changed.
It's obviously better when there's no lag, but even then it's not as enjoyable as I remember it being back in 2004.
SWAT is still the best form of Halo there is (for me).