• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Lars Andersen: a new level of archery

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loxley

Member
You can use the guard as a hook to remove pieces of amor, or as a blunt weapon, like a hammer, to damage through the armor itself, which a blade isn't ideal for.
The idea is that you use a sword in many different ways, depending on the circumstances, rather than just the traditional fencing you see in hollywood.

There's a scene in Kingdom of Heaven that briefly shows this off, but I can't find it anywhere online.

*edit - Nevermind, found it
 
vqndxbswu4w.gif
 

Nikodemos

Member
But seriously why even use a sword at all if youre gonna use it like that. Seems like youre fucked if you forgot to bring your gauntlet.
Even with (thick) leather gloves, it's not very dangerous, as long as you don't let the blade slip.

The mordhau ("death strike") was one of the few effective strikes against an enemy wearing plate ('harness'), since arming swords are pretty useless in combat against armoured opponents (even somebody wearing an old-fashioned surcoat+maille hauberk+gambeson is relatively impervious to a regular sword).
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
You laugh now, but when the Zombie Apocalypse comes, he's going to be laughing from the top of his arrow-defended fort while you die once you run out of ammo because your bullets keep attracting more zombies.
 
Modern Kyūdō practitioners use the same technique. Granted Kyūdō is a martial art and not a sport, so competition and hitting the target aren't the focus. Here's a neat video about it.

R9eD1tO.jpg


tbT2GSB.jpg

That looks pretty cool.

Maybe I should try it.

Yup. Sword play in Hollywood is also all wrong. Basically, most things the common person knows about the past is inaccurate. Doesn't matter if it's cowboys, knights, archers, ninjas, etc. All wrong.

0qpql0V.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1S_Q3CGqZmg

Basically Hollywood chose entertainment over accuracy. Can't blame them, problem is, people believe that what Hollywood shows is real.

Every time I see this picture pop up, I can't help but laugh, I dunno why.
 

RobertM

Member
I never knew people drew arrows on the left side, I used to use only the right as a kid. Great to know I did it the right way
 

Kinyou

Member
You can use the guard as a hook to remove pieces of amor, or as a blunt weapon, like a hammer, to damage through the armor itself, which a blade isn't ideal for.
The idea is that you use a sword in many different ways, depending on the circumstances, rather than just the traditional fencing you see in hollywood.

There's a scene in Kingdom of Heaven that briefly shows this off, but I can't find it anywhere online.

*edit - Nevermind, found it
Ah, ok. In motion it looks more sensical. The picture made it seem really awkward.
 

Effect

Member
This is pretty amazing. Funny enough the first time I picked up a bow it always felt natural to have the arrow on the right side. Placing on the left even though I'm holding the bow in my left hand felt weird right from the start.
 

This is an awesome video. Really great explanation and well, they show it very well. It actually makes sense, that is, the turn from holding it one handed to holding the blade, ramming down with the cross-guard, and trying to pommel the face. Man, so fluid. I love it.
 
That seem to be a good premise of a Lec Besson movie thats also completely useless in 21th century. Why did he shit on Hollywood in the video?
 

Forkball

Member
Remember that scene in Return of the King when Legolas killed everyone on the elephant and then surfed down its trunk?

Turns out that shit was legit.
 

IceCold

Member
This is an awesome video. Really great explanation and well, they show it very well. It actually makes sense, that is, the turn from holding it one handed to holding the blade, ramming down with the cross-guard, and trying to pommel the face. Man, so fluid. I love it.

Yeah that video is great. Seeing the image makes the technique seem weird but you realize it makes sense when you see it in motion. It makes it more abvious how ridiculous a lot of the sword fighting we see in movies/tv are shit. Most of those guys would get destroyed with their fighting style irl.
 

Nikodemos

Member
Why even start with a sword then? Why not just use a big warhammer or something?
Because a considerable number of fighters on a medieval battlefield were filler. They couldn't afford metal armour, or could only afford some pieces (rather than a complete set). A sword worked perfectly against leather or quilted armour.

And yes, a large number of fighters didn't bother with swords. They used mauls, axes, maces etc.
 

Khaz

Member

Well that's awkward. Their fight is mainly choreographied, they go slow and actively try not to hit their opponent. They don't even bother wearing protection. I'm not saying their technique wouldn't work in a proper combat, but they just did a Hollywood fight that didn't show anything. Would it work in combat against someone unprepared for it? And against someone who knows it? We don't know and this video showed nothing. Especially they showed their move had a counter move that was apparently quite deadly and they didn't have a counter counter-move. I wouldn't be the one to try the move in combat against a prepared opponent.

[edit] Oh, they are fight choreographers. Well that explains it.
 

Kite

Member
T62RZTp.jpg

Jv3HcaO.jpg

PXgBkBo.jpg

heh from now on I'm gonna have to check which side of the bow the arrow is whenever I see a bow and arrow scene.

edit: three out of the 4 anime I watched today had archery and all drew the arrow back on the correct side lol
 
This dude's rebuttal to Lars is hilarious:

http://geekdad.com/2015/01/danish-archer/

Apparently, Lars is hilariously wrong and inaccurate about everything?


“If he wanted to shoot like the master archers of old, he would have to unlearn what he had learned,” the narrator tells us. If Andersen had ever actually learned anything from real archers before going on his historical quest, he would have had a lot less to unlearn. What he had learned is the usual collection of bad habits that self-taught amateur archers always display, many of which continue unabated in his new, allegedly historic techniques. He is a terrible archer who can shoot fast. He shoots very fast. He shoots very badly very fast.

Continuing on with a complete lack of understanding of the physics of archery, the narrator asserts “these archers started placing the arrow on the left side of the bow. This is probably due to the fact that aiming at a stationary two-dimensional target makes you aim with one eye.” In point of fact, no, it’s not. The reason for moving the arrow to the left side of the bow (for a right-handed archer) is something known as “the Archer’s Paradox,” a complicated collection of physics phenomena that results in the arrow hitting to the right even though when it’s on the bow it’s pointing slightly to the left. You can see it in the slow-motion footage during the tournament scene in Brave; as the arrow begins its flight, it’s oscillating back and forth, swimming through the air like a fish and moving to the left, until the aerodynamic effect of the air passing over feathers causes it to begin spinning, at which point the arrow turns and begins traveling to the right. (You can also see how simple and fast it is to place an arrow on the bow, despite Andersen’s absurd play-acting.) This scene was painstakingly recreated from high-speed footage shot by professional archers for Russell Crowe’s Robin Hood, using historically accurate English longbows. Placing the arrow on the left side of the bow compensates for this effect; without it, archers would have to aim to the left in order to hit their target. In point of fact, most archers, especially those shooting traditional styles, shoot with both eyes open.

“He uses forgotten historical methods…” No, they were not forgotten. They just weren’t European. Archery is one of the oldest human activities, found in virtually every culture on Earth, and dating back tens of thousands of years. There are wide variations in equipment and shooting techniques around the world, and Andersen’s “discoveries” are well-known to anyone who has ever studied Asian and Eastern European archery, such as Mongolian, Tibetan or Hungarian styles. The famous Native American archer Ishi was known for shooting in a style very similar to Andersen’s, putting the arrow on the outside of the bow in the style of the Yahi People of the Pacific Northwest.

Another fun exercise would be comparing Andersen’s clumsy attempts at running and jumping to actual practitioners of parkour, martial arts, or gymnastics. Frankly, I’m surprised people aren’t mocking his awkward attempts at action shots, since to me he looks about as impressive and coordinated as the Star Wars kid.

There's a lot more at the link. He pretty much does a complete, angry tear-down of everything in the video. I'm finding it hard to not laugh really hard.
 

Leunam

Member
I remember reading that the bit about the quiver was completely wrong as well. There was usually some kind of padding at the bottom of the quiver that held the arrows in place.
 
Yeah, I read that blog post a few weeks ago and the video is even more damning. His claims about historical accuracy seemed even more suspect when combined with his 'acrobatics'. He just needs to work on his parkour skills a little bit, then he can just do the stunt work for Arrow and stop shitting on English longbowmen. He wouldn't get near one, that was the whole fucking point.
 
I should not have read the comments. Talk about a bunch of insecure dudes who don't like being told by a woman that their new favorite internet badass just kinda makes things up.

Bunch of losers.

I actually really appreciate the video. I love the history of archery. Lars is just a talented trick shooting dude full of shit and himself.

Also loved the growing numbers of arrows she had to hold as she kept listing off new reasons why Lars was wrong. Also that eye patch, lolololol.

Only thing I didn't like about the video was the shitty background and weird... editing?
 
So... he went from being awesome to a total joke.

Nice.

j/k
No, I really mean it
No, j/k
Ahh, I don't know
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom