The Technomancer
card-carrying scientician
Its a great movie. Its one of the best of the MCU. On reflection, I think it edges out Winter Soldier, its basically tied with the first Captain America for me for "best MCU" movie
Killian is even closer to Tony as a character. A twisted mirror image of Tony. He is a man who, by his own ingenuity and willpower, overcame a disability to create an empire like Tony's and managed to beat Tony (albeit temporarily) by doing the one thing that no one thought was possible: he created tech that was better, even more cutting edge than Tony's. It's a tech that Killian relies on, like a crutch. Tony had Iron Man, Killian had Extremis. And the only way Tony could beat Killian was to believe that he was more than his tech, that he, Tony Stark the person, was Iron Man.
You reversed the order of those scenes broski. He infiltrates the mansion and then he saves the people on Air Force One.
And jarvis is the one who tells him the "mandarin" is in miami. The point of my first sentence regarding the airplane rescue is that he only needed jarvis online to send him a suit, which at the time before the Miami scene, was online.
Its a great movie. Its one of the best of the MCU. On reflection, I think it edges out Winter Soldier, its basically tied with the first Captain America for me for "best MCU" movie
^It's better than Iron Man 2 but that's not saying much.
For it to be tied to Winter Soldier that means you liked it better than Iron Man 1?
I haven't seen Winter Soilder yet so I don't know how that movie compares.
He literally at one point in the movie around the airplane rescue just says "Jarvis should we enact the house party protocol?" That means he just needed jarvis active to be able to dispatch a suit to him. The entire Miami mansion scene Sam fisher scene is done with Tony having access to the other suits except for mark 42 because Jarvis is online by that point.
Add to the fact that the entire movie has Tony in a start of a metroid game situation for no discernable reason.
I agree that the movie intended this thematic comparison and maybe it would have been interesting if the movie had been executed properly, but they blew it. His turn to villainy turns on the flimsiest reasoning I've seen in a movie in ages (because Tony didn't want to talk to him on News Years Day?).Killian is even closer to Tony as a character. A twisted mirror image of Tony. He is a man who, by his own ingenuity and willpower, overcame a disability to create an empire like Tony's and managed to beat Tony (albeit temporarily) by doing the one thing that no one thought was possible: he created tech that was better, even more cutting edge than Tony's. It's a tech that Killian relies on, like a crutch. Tony had Iron Man, Killian had Extremis. And the only way Tony could beat Killian was to believe that he was more than his tech, that he, Tony Stark the person, was Iron Man.
That's way more interesting than a vague terrorist who may or may not have any magic powers.
I think I totally checked out from this movie the moment a bad guy shot fire out of his mouth. So lame.
Meh, I thought the point was that was all a joke. That it was all because some dude was butt hurt instead of a huge major plot, and my boy's name is the Mandarin. And does Iron Man really have any good villains? Honest question, never read his stuff.
It was a plot element on Agents of Shield. My bigger problem with it in IM3 is how it turns random people into super badass unkillable soldiers capable of ripping apart Iron Man suits with their bare hands like tin foil. Not even Thor does that shit in this universe, but take a shot of Extremis and you're apparently stronger than Thor.
OP banned for liking Iron Man 3.
the forced loveable kid helps saves the day aspect(where the hell were his parents again?)
Aren't they just melting through them? I don't remember anyone literally ripping the suits apart.
Ben Kingsley watching a Liverpool game took me by surprise xD