• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

007 SPECTRE |OT| It's me, Austin. It was me all along, Austin.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rich!

Member
I think...once this is out on blu ray, I may do an edit of it to try and trim it down a bit. Most of the Mi6 scenes, for example.
 

Blader

Member
I'm still trying to figure what other British director could do a Bond film who isn't Nolan.


I mean, I'm keen on that option, but for some reason I'm drawing a blank on any other option that hasn't done one of them yet.

Danny Boyle?

Well Timothy Dalton has already proved he can be a very charismatic villain in Hot Fuzz.

Yeah, but I think with Dalton -- if his turns in Doctor Who and Hot Fuzz are anything to go by -- his villains tend to lean toward hammy. Brosnan, at least in The Ghost Writer, feels more sinister and subtle about it.

But that could just be the nature of how those things were directed too. Roman Polanski and Edgar Wright don't exactly have the same style. :lol
 
I'm still trying to figure what other British director could do a Bond film who isn't Nolan.


I mean, I'm keen on that option, but for some reason I'm drawing a blank on any other option that hasn't done one of them yet.

Guy Ritchie proved he could with Man from U.N.C.L.E, among other movies, or maybe Matthew Vaughn (directed Layer Cake)
 
A loving homage to the scene in From Russia With Love.

You say potato, I say patata.

The train brawl was incredible IMO.

The fighting itself was pretty good, and I liked that it wasn't scored (at least until the last bit), but the poor cinematography, loony toons ending, and the total lack of pace or tension in building up the train scenes and Hinx's character himself just made that whole sequence feel like they put a fight on a train JUST to have a fight on a train and reference the GOAT FRWL. How that sequence is constructed and the amazing henchman Red Grant compared to the one in Spectre is night and day.
 

shintoki

sparkle this bitch
A loving homage to the scene in From Russia With Love.

You say potato, I say patata.

Anything on the train was devoid of thought.

Between the poor Casino Royale knock off with Bond and Vesper to the Red Grant vs Bond fight in FRWL. There was no build up at all. It was just... Remember Bond and Vesper. Remember Red Grant and Bond.

It's very clear Mendes and the writing staff can not come up with a damn original idea or properly build up to anything.
 

Blader

Member
Continuity is nothing new for Bond - all the Connery films are linked.

Dr No was a SPECTRE agent. In FRWL, spectre set up Bond and plotted to kill him in retaliation for Dr No's death. Goldfinger was a side story, but in Thunderball Bond stops Spectre again and kills their number 2 (largo). You Only Live Twice is next, where Bond eventually meets Blofeld in his volcano lair, blows it up and then in OHMSS he meets Blofeld again, who kills his wife. And then diamonds are Forever wraps it all up, albeit badly.

And then For Your Eyes Only wraps it up even worse. :lol
 
And then For Your Eyes Only wraps it up even worse. :lol

foryoureyesonlybdcap1_original.jpg

I don't know what you're talking about!
 

SinShep

Member
Dr No was a SPECTRE agent. In FRWL, spectre set up Bond and plotted to kill him in retaliation for Dr No's death. Goldfinger was a side story, but in Thunderball Bond stops Spectre again and kills their number 2 (largo). You Only Live Twice is next, where Bond eventually meets Blofeld in his volcano lair, blows it up and then in OHMSS he meets Blofeld again, who kills his wife. And then diamonds are Forever wraps it all up, albeit badly.

I'd use this as a reason why I think the continuity in QoS was a really good idea. After I watched DaF following OHMSSs ending it felt like really wasted potential of a revenge story. The way Quantum carries over its theme of revenge for Bond through the film, then concludes it was very much the kind of thing I was hoping for in DaF.
 

jet1911

Member
Really liked the movie. I thought the story was pretty good. Didn't like the car chase though. There was no tension at all.
 
I don't think I was prepared for just how incredibly dull this turned out to be. Thomas Newman's score is so damn boring, and strangely distracting(maybe it was just my theater, but the sound mix was quite bad, making some dialog very hard to hear). There isn't a single exciting set piece in the entire film, with only the train fight threatening to be interesting. Everybody, every single actor, seems bored to be in this movie. And between Sam Mendes static compositions, Lee Harvey's editing, the stunning lack of wit from the script, and the look of the film that seems to either be overblown light from God or deadening beige, its a challenge to keep yourself awake for all 150 agonizingly long minutes. And as bad as the first half was, somehow the second half is even worse, with a central romance with zero sparks or chemistry, a completely wasted Christopher Waltz, pointless retcons, and about 3 anti-climaxes one after another, each more nonsencial than the last. I felt trapped watching this movie. I wanted to escape the theater, but some sense of fandom kept me there.

Thing is, its the kind of bad film that makes you question that fandom. Like maybe this is it for me, this series has clearly gone so far up its own ass, that even on the curve that we often rate James Bond movies, I can't even give it a pass. Then I went back to YouTube, and found that clip of Bond and Vesper on the train. What a night and day difference! A conversation full of wit and character-revealing moments, performed by actors clearly relishing the material, starring a Bond who's cool and handsome but still somebody recognizably human, edited with a smooth rhythm for maximum audience engagement. Then I went through all the other clips, the fantastic action sequences, David Arnold's wonderful score, how a fuckin' poker game had more dramatic stakes and tension than all the sequences in Spectre combined, and then I realized....no, I don't hate James Bond. Its just Spectre that sucks.
 
Just got back. Really enjoyed it but felt that they could have cut about twenty minutes from the middle it ran too long.

This is pretty much where I like my Bond tonally.
 
Just saw it. I liked it but not as much as Casino Royale and Skyfall.

Casino Royale>Skyfall>Spectre>Quantum of Solace

And no, I don't hate Quantum of Solace, in fact I liked all these movies.

This is pretty much my ranking and I like them all as well. Spectre would probably crack the top 10 on my overall Bond list too. I need to think it over.
 

ryseing

Member
I think SPECTRE sets a record for outstanding actors absolutely wasted in meaningless roles between Scott, Waltz, and Bellucci. While Seydoux wasn't totally wasted she and Craig had little chemistry. The constant Vesper reminders did her no favors.

At least seeing it in IMAX was kinda fun. Definitely the worst out of the four espionage movies I've seen this year though.

Guy Ritchie proved he could with Man from U.N.C.L.E, among other movies, or maybe Matthew Vaughn (directed Layer Cake)

Vaughn did Kingsman so...
 

Pachimari

Member
I loved them, Craig was incredible IMO.

It was just to much, I have no idea where to jump in. But when there is a Spectre Arc in the old movies, I will follow them first.
The first five movies have Spectre in them. They are also worth watching. Dr No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger, Thunderball and On Her Majesty's Secret Service.

Don't miss out on either of the Timothy Dalton movies either. They are very mature and different from the rest of them. Those are License to Kill and The Living Daylights.

I would recommend watching at least one movie from each actor.
 

GAMEPROFF

Banned
I was talking about Die another Day, assuming that's what you watched.
Was this the one with Halle Berry and the stupid satelite who melted the ice palast?
I saw this and thought, ok, this is classic Bond? Seems I didnt missed to much, but Ive learned that the Brosnan era seemed to be the worst yet?

Will definitly watch a couple of them when I see a sale, very excited for classics like From Russia with love, etc
 

AcridMeat

Banned
Saw it yesterday, and came out a bit disappointed. Some parts were good but it was far too long, the car chase seemed more like a throwaway, and it was pretty formulaic.

The worst is
figuring out the head security guy would be a main villain in his second scene and having to wait 90 minutes for that reveal.

Léa Seydoux though.
whoo.png
 
I keep seeing Spectre called "cheesy." I actually didn't find the movie particularly cheesy, to be honest. I thought Skyfall was far cheesier than Spectre.

Spectre was just ineptly plotted and written, with dull visuals, dull direction and dull acting.

Skyfall was corny and stupid, but it sure as hell wasn't dull.
 
Recorded a rather long audio review for it with a friend:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPdPvzcfZ14

(As a warning, there's a fairly light spoiler somewhere in there that isn't part of the ending spoiler section, but I'll say it "spoils" something that I'm confident almost everyone can figure out on their own).

I don't hate Spectre and I think it remains watchable and even enjoyable at times, but if they wanted to go back to formula, they really shouldn't have even tried to do the emotional, personal stuff because all of that just falls flat. I think it could've worked as "just another Bond movie," but they clearly tried to make it more than that and almost everything involved in that attempt (the villain, the continuity, the romance, the "deeper" themes) is half-baked at best. It completes Skyfall's rather unfortunate aspiration to steer the franchise back into familiar territory, but it doesn't even do that particularly well since it has all the baggage of being a Daniel Craig James Bond movie tacked on.
 

Pachimari

Member
Was this the one with Halle Berry and the stupid satelite who melted the ice palast?
I saw this and thought, ok, this is classic Bond? Seems I didnt missed to much, but Ive learned that the Brosnan era seemed to be the worst yet?
Yes, that's the one.

It depends who you ask. I would argue Roger Moore is the worst but I haven't finished The Spy Who Loved Me and have yet to see For Your Eyes Only. But at least Goldeneye and Tomorrow Never Dies are good and I enjoyed the first hour of Die Another Day. But again, it depends who you ask.
 

Melon Husk

Member
i enjoyed the train scene... it would have benefited with more focus on bond and swann.

Long winded, like all the scenes in Spectre. I liked it way more than the opening scene that kept going on and on... and we all knew the most obvious way it'd end, and so it did. Similarly the main plot was clear the moment they showed the news on the
Johannesburg
bombing.

Also, something I noticed:

They would have never treated England/Scotland as an exotic location in the old days.
Please stop bombing the shit out of London aswell.
 

GAMEPROFF

Banned
Similarly the plot was clear the moment they showed the news on the
Johannesburg
bombing.
It was clear for me the moment
South Africa voted no.
And I found it strange that nobody thought it was a fitting coincident, that
Johannesburg was bombed
shortly later.
 
I keep seeing Spectre called "cheesy." I actually didn't find the movie particularly cheesy, to be honest. I thought Skyfall was far cheesier than Spectre.

Spectre was just ineptly plotted and written, with dull visuals, dull direction and dull acting.

Skyfall was corny and stupid, but it sure as hell wasn't dull.

It was almost certainly cheesy. How they ever thought that movie would be any good on release is an absolute mystery to me. It had no business even being labeled a bond film as far as I'm concerned. Or maybe I'm just so disappointed that I'm being extra harsh with my criticism. Either way, the movie simply wasn't very good at all. The plot was terrible, I didn't find the villains at all cool or interesting past the very earliest stages of the movie.

As others have said, it was beyond obvious from the very early part of the movie that one of the "good guys" would turn out to be a traitor. C, I believe the name was. I honestly can't remember very much about it. To be honest, it felt like a really, really long version of one of those WWE sponsored films or something.
 

Hatchtag

Banned
how the hell did this have the same exact plot as MI5
Like seriously, how?

It was enjoyable. Needed more Waltz. Hope there isn't another Craig Bond, because this was a good ending.
 

Blader

Member
Yes, that's the one.

It depends who you ask. I would argue Roger Moore is the worst but I haven't finished The Spy Who Loved Me and have yet to see For Your Eyes Only. But at least Goldeneye and Tomorrow Never Dies are good and I enjoyed the first hour of Die Another Day. But again, it depends who you ask.

Moore is the worst. The Spy Who Loved and For Your Eyes Only are his best, but only insofar as they're the least bad of an entirely bad run.

how the hell did this have the same exact plot as MI5
Like seriously, how?

I'm not sure where the MI5 plot comparisons are coming from, but mostly because I've largely forgotten that movie's plot. :lol
 

Mr-Joker

Banned
Came back from watching it, it was okay.

Though it was amazing how Bond can get into a fight and still come out unscarred and by amazing I mean boring. Bond is such a Gary Sue. ¬_¬;
 
I have 30 minutes left of The Spy Who Loved Me, and so far it have been fantastic though. Most likely a top 10 Bond movie.

The Spy Who Loved Me is my favorite Moore film.

For Your Eyes Only is probably the most common choice, but I find TSWLM so much more enjoyable. It's Bond cheese at its best.
 
Watched this today. Movie itself was ok (which is still improvement compared to other Craig Bonds) but that intro song was the worst tint he history of series.
 

Blader

Member
If you want to talk about gross age gaps between Bond and Bond girls, For Your Eyes Only might be the worst offender. Moore was 54 in that film, she was 24!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom