Had you told me this in 2013, i would've laughed hard. Now, after seeing all the gratuitous hate the game is getting on the internet, i'll be very surprised if its metascore will be above 78-81. Luckily i don't give a damn shit about reviews, especially after last gen, so it won't really be a problem for me if reviewers will shit on my most anticipated game. Maybe then i won't like it, but i'll be the judge of that.I really don't see Xenoblade X having a 90 metacritic rating.
Agreed.Yoshi (imo unfairly) shunned by reviewers.
Considering they shat out Animal Crossing Amiibo Party, Chibi Robo and Mario Tennis just recently and PZ5 and Yoshi were (imo unfairly) shunned by reviewers, too, I'm surprised it's not so much worse than it is.
If you told me this in 2013, i would've laughed hard. Now, after seeing all the gratuitous hate the game is getting on the internet, i'll be very surprised if its metascore will be above 78-81. Luckily i don't give a damn shit about reviews, especially after last gen, so it won't really be a problem for me if reviewers will shit on my most anticipated game. Maybe then i won't like it, but i'll be the judge of that.
Considering they shat out Animal Crossing Amiibo Party, Chibi Robo and Mario Tennis just recently and PZ5 and Yoshi were (imo unfairly) shunned by reviewers, too, I'm surprised it's not so much worse than it is.
When you have full priced shovelware like the two AC releases this year, you tend to look crappy in the review department. Hopefully the lukewarm reception of these two titles makes Nintendo put forth at least a tiny bit of effort before trying to extract $40-$60 from its users.
I really think this is one of those pointless statistics.
As the average doesn't really matter, getting a bunch of 75's would then be better than a few 90's and a few duds.
It's easy to forget that Other M reviewed pretty decently. It really wasn't until it was in the hands of gamers that you saw the vitriol and the retrospective articles about "hey, this did suck ass!" popping up a short time thereafter.AND it's the year in which Other M released
averages across entire game libraries mean almost nothing
What about Mario Maker? Or Yoshi? Or Kirby? Or Majora's Mask 3D?
Its also a year where games like Codename STEAM, Kirby, and Yoshi got slaughtered by traditional outlets and are all excellent.
Also, stop including HHD in the apparent year end rushed titles. Game is great.
I'm not quite sure why people are including Codename Steam in a list of games that are hidden gems.
Neither do I, upper 70s most likely
The OP stat is currently made up from the lowest number of software releases they've put out in a while though, I'd agree with you if they'd increased output by 25% and review scores had dropped in inverse proportion.Corners had to be cut when Nintendo is the only one releasing software on that console. Gotta keep churning out software.
The OP stat is currently made up from the lowest number of software releases they've put out in a while though, I'd agree with you if they'd increased output by 25% and review scores had dropped in inverse proportion.
Even when you add in delayed titles and those yet to be released this year, it would still end up as about average in terms of number of titles released.
Did you really just use 'all time' in the same sentence as 'for the past 10 years'?
Activision would score bad because of Tony Hawk 5.Do this for other major publishers as well so Activision games can be averaged out with their licensed trash.
Its a bad metric.
it's TI82 what did you expect
Its also a year where games like Codename STEAM, Kirby, and Yoshi got slaughtered by traditional outlets and are all excellent.
Also, stop including HHD in the apparent year end rushed titles. Game is great.
I think the new game is supposed to be a lot better, but I'm sure sure if that'll reflect in the score.The first two mystery dungeon games were stellar IMO, but they reviewed very poorly. If Super Mystery Dungeon is anywhere as bad as Gates to Infinity, I doubt it'll put a dent in that average.
Looking forward to seeing how it does though.
I think it's fitting that 2015 is the worst in10 years. Seems completely deserved. I mean yeah there were some good/great games this year but nothing at all like 2014 or even 2013.
2010 though... 0_0 daaaaamn, and people said Wii was a critical flop.
Considering they shat out Animal Crossing Amiibo Party, Chibi Robo and Mario Tennis just recently and PZ5 and Yoshi were (imo unfairly) shunned by reviewers, too, I'm surprised it's not so much worse than it is.
If you want to take the numbers for accurate analysis in relation to quality, maybe. But I think for around estimation on the critical reception of their games I think it has enough merit to discuss it.With different reviewers reviewing all the games, when you say they had the lowest reviews in 10 years, the numbers mean absolutely nothing.
Nintendo is still arguably publisher of the year this year even with some of the misses they had. They had 3 GOTY contenders.
Data derived from
And yes, I know that 2015 isn't over yet. But there are only two titles left for 2015, Xenoblade Chronicles X and Pokemon Mystery Dungeon.
So, let's assume both will match the scores of their previous titles (which Xenoblade is unlikely to do given import impressions) that would give us a +149 for total score (90 theoretical for Xenoblade, 59 theoretical for Mystery Dungeon) and a 29 for total hardware in 2015.
Which leaves us with 70.2 average, still the lowest in the past ten years. Just some food for thought, could be because the extremely low software output this year or because of low quality titles such as Amiibo Festival and Mario Tennis.
If you want to take the numbers for accurate analysis in relation to quality, maybe. But I think for around estimation on the critical reception of their games I think it has enough merit to discuss it.