• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PC Low Settings Screenshot Thread

EatChildren

Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
dragonageinquisition29zut9.png

dragonageinquisition2qhuuh.png
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Oh, I thread I can contribute to!

sZnpR8m.jpg

This is the best my current pc can do. Almost playable at 20ish fps.


That's basically how I played through Half-Life 2. Pentium 4 1.4ghz (the shitastic first-gen P4s) with a FX5200. The game stuttered every time I used the gravity gun.
 

Angryhead

Neo Member
Some Skyrim shots from a few years ago:

GrwWx.jpg

GToPY.jpg

Gsdv9.jpg


The machine I took these on had a single-core 2GHz CPU, 1 GB of RAM and a ATI Radeon X1300 card, so under the minimum requirements. I didn't actually play it much on that machine, just took the screenshots for fun.
 

ricki42

Member
This is how I played through most of The Witcher
BUd9tMO.png

Everything set as low as possible or turned off, resolution 1366x768, ran mostly at 20 - 30 fps, sometimes lower, on a Thinkpad 220 (integrated intel 3000 graphics).
This is what made me decide to build a gaming PC, where the same scene looks like this.
 

hateradio

The Most Dangerous Yes Man
That actually still looks pretty good.

All this reminds me of that horrible wave effect they have near water sources.

They have the waves stop at a certain point. It's the most awful effect ever.
 

Ludono

Member
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

640x480
All settings at low

iXZnBcpo4cNFZ.png

ibjbK2lzRdGIJ7.png

iqjXSW0KfbzmZ.png


Actually doesn't look terrible, definitely very playable.
 

Daingurse

Member
This is how I played through most of The Witcher
BUd9tMO.png

Everything set as low as possible or turned off, resolution 1366x768, ran mostly at 20 - 30 fps, sometimes lower, on a Thinkpad 220 (integrated intel 3000 graphics).
This is what made me decide to build a gaming PC, where the same scene looks like this.

Good lord this looks rough. I remember Witcher 1 running TERRIBLY on my hardware when I played through it the month before Witcher 2 dropped. I think I had 5870's and my 980x?!! That game just didn't give a fuck, excellent RPG though. Loved it.
 

Megabat

Member
d55shot20160216time2243.png

shot20160216time2239.png

shot20160216time2257.png


It still looks pretty good.

720p, point_shadow_resolution 8, sun_shadow_resolution 8, no MSAA, no texture filtering

With the same settings at 1440p w/MSAA, it actually looks incredible. Maybe better than full spec!
 

GreatNumber

Unconfirmed Member
Call of Duty Black Ops 3
All settings set to lowest including Resolution scaling and Fov.
pDoxjuW.jpg

All settings set to as high as they can be with resolution scaling and Fov at it's lowest.
teN18X2.jpg

Technically cheating, but this is the game at it's absolute lowest via the in game settings.
v0zq7TE.jpg
 

CHC

Member
Aside from the jaggies, Black Ops III and GTAV both manage to stay pretty good looking.

Tomb Raider though.... ouch!
 

Maxey

Member
This thread makes me think that if devs were willing to go the extra mile, they could make it so low and medium settings would have a carefully planned aesthetic instead of just being worse looking versions of the highest quality settings.

So imagine that setting a game to low quality would actually make it look like a good looking PS2 game, medium a PS3 game, high is PS4 settings and then have ultra be the one that takes advantage of good rigs.

Of course that would only work for the global quality scale, the games would still have individual options of course.
 

Nvzman

Member
Tomb Raider might look like shit at lowest settings, but that means it can likely run on shit.

If you get what I mean.
 
This thread makes me think that if devs were willing to go the extra mile, they could make it so low and medium settings would have a carefully planned aesthetic instead of just being worse looking versions of the highest quality settings.

So imagine that setting a game to low quality would actually make it look like a good looking PS2 game, medium a PS3 game, high is PS4 settings and then have ultra be the one that takes advantage of good rigs.

Of course that would only work for the global quality scale, the games would still have individual options of course.

You mean something like this alternate low-poly style for TF2 being a toggle in the options menu?
I honestly would like that. Back with my old PC a setting like that would have been a godsend.
 

Ullus

Member
Maybe someday I should disable my GTX 970 and see how much performance I can squeeze out by running everything on low on Intel integrated...
The integrated graphics are actually pretty capable, had to use it when my 970 broke, could play GW2 on mixed medium settings without too much trouble.
 

kraspkibble

Permabanned.
most games at their lowest settings aren't that bad. maybe it's just me because i've played on consoles all my life. this is why the first thing i set on a PC game is the AA and texture filtering. i can put up with anything else but jaggies/blurred textures are just the worst.
 
Top Bottom