Art Vandilay
Member
They did the same thing with Blood Dragon and 3 so... heh.
Blood Dragon wasn't a $60 release.
They did the same thing with Blood Dragon and 3 so... heh.
That wasn't $60...
Is FCP 2 hours long like Blood Dragon? I haven't played it so why do people keep comparing it to Blood?
I would like to see the argument that this isn't lazy.
Nope.
Far Cry 4: "Himalayas "
Far Cry Primal: "Central Europe"
Having said that, maybe it started out as Far Cry 4 dlc?
It's a full sized game that retains some elements of recent far cry gameplay while managing to be its own thing as well.
If you came in and watched someone playing with the HUD off like I've been, you wouldn't even know it was a Far Cry game.
The people making the more snide comments just have height issues, that's why they grab the low hanging fruit.
They did the same thing with Blood Dragon and 3 so... heh.
That wasn't $60...
Blood Dragon wasn't a $60 release.
They're using similar animations too... it's not just the map that's being rehash, climbing, scavenging and a feel others look exactly the same.
It's the same map but with different landscape or layout? Because there are some areas that do not remember from previous games
A bit of both, really. Then they threw in that Blood Dragon easter egg and Hurk's ancestor for good measure.I think that's kinda cool actually. Being able to see how the area changed in 12000 years or whatever.
But then again it's Ubisoft so one has to wonder if that was their actual intention, or if they were just cutting corners.
I would like to see the argument that this isn't lazy.
I think that's kinda cool actually. Being able to see how the area changed in 12000 years or whatever.
But then again it's Ubisoft so one has to wonder if that was their actual intention, or if they were just cutting corners.
I'll give Ubisoft props, they got away with it. And that in itself is brilliance.
Blood Dragon wasn't a $60 release.
Ubisoft doing minimal work to release a product for full price?
Im shocked.
This is no excuse, but take into consideration that this is a far cry game.
If noone noticed until now who cares
I think that's kinda cool actually. Being able to see how the area changed in 12000 years or whatever.
But then again it's Ubisoft so one has to wonder if that was their actual intention, or if they were just cutting corners.
The "lazy developers" thing here is getting disgusting.
The "lazy developers" thing here is getting disgusting.
Ubisoft doing minimal work to release a product for full price?
Im shocked.
It's not "lazy". It's smart.
There's literally no reason for Ubisoft to have designed something new. Considering that no one noticed until they carefully looked at the 2D maps, it appears that they were right.
Anyone who says they noticed this by simply playing the game is probably a liar.
A smart use of existing resources.What else would you call this? fan service? easter egg?
Whelp so much for that! lol Haven't played the past two FC's so I didn't know.They are two different locations tho.
It's not "lazy". It's smart.
There's literally no reason for Ubisoft to have designed something new. Considering that no one noticed until they carefully looked at the 2D maps, it appears that they were right.
Anyone who says they noticed this by simply playing the game is probably a liar.
The "lazy developers" thing here is getting disgusting.