Alpha Phoenix
Member
Says the studio who has yet to make a game with > 80 on Metacritic.
I meant it more as a general commentary, rather than Geralt's story in particular. That being said, just because the protag is straight and does straight things, that doesn't mean the rest of the game gets a pass for not promoting alternatives - Inquisition is actually a good example, considering even the background NPC crowds are pretty diverse and you have characters like Krem.
Says the studio who has yet to make a game with > 80 on Metacritic.
The Witcher never pretended to be set in an authentic medieval society. That world is full of anachronisms and if their scholars can have a fairly good grasp on modern sciences (even genetic engineering), it really shouldn't have to obey by any of our outdated rules.It's still fantasy based within a medieval setting no? Certainly the sexism is part of the world building to make it seem authentic to that setting, if you don't agree though that's cool.
Says the studio who has yet to make a game with > 80 on Metacritic.
While I like your post, I think you're confusing Keira with YenneferKiera is also love with Geralt, In the story of the Witcher, Geralt can choose between two women, Kiera and Triss who both love him. The witcher series is based on a book series. So if the poster you quoted finds this scene sexist then its not the fault of the devs. Unless you believe its the devs job to filter out the seduction of Geralt completely.
I found the who sequences between Triss talking about her fears / the pushyness of Kiera's and Geralt's relationship. Geralts responses to really humanize fill out all the characters.
The problem is down to the viewer, some of us can put down our ideological lens to enjoy the media at hand instead of looking at accusing the devs of portraying women negatively even though the Witcher does an excellent job of moving the bar forward on how to portray women instead of just eye candy.
When people feel threatened and shamed and can't find a rebuttal where they win they attack the man and not the argument.What does this have to do with anything?
I meant it more as a general commentary, rather than Geralt's story in particular. That being said, just because the protag is straight and does straight things, that doesn't mean the rest of the game gets a pass for not promoting alternatives - Inquisition is actually a good example, considering even the background NPC crowds are pretty diverse and you have characters like Krem.
sigh, im really tired of 'sexist this, racist that'...
what is wrong with people.
I think everyone has made all the witty comments possible towards The Chinese Room.Says the studio who has yet to make a game with > 80 on Metacritic.
You mean women and gay men can play The Witcher 3 and enjoy it?!
The books are mostly fine. The show is undeniably sexist.
Yeah, that really is a pathetic rebuttal.Says the studio who has yet to make a game with > 80 on Metacritic.
at least they make good ones
White men aren't an oppressed class in society.Oh ok then, pack it up boys. Case settled. SG-17 has declared it once and for all. ¬_¬.
Without spoiling the show for some. You have both sexes being treated horribly. You have both sexes objectified. You have the Blacksmiths son shirtless with a perfect body practicing with a sword. The brothel which also contains homosexuals, characters that are bi.
You have numerous men stripped. You have mutilations of men in many ways. You have women using their sexuality for personal gain. A man who's practically a-sexual. As well as the usual accusations female sexual objectification and raping of female characters that immediately makes any show to use rape in a story as "sexist".
I have never heard when a male gets raped, or gets his organs mutilated as this show is sexist towards men. Do you know why? Cause male characters can be treated like shit and that's acceptable.
FWIW, I know CDPR don't exactly have the best reputation when it comes to representation in their games. But for a studio to up and call another's project 'sexist' based on an obscure teaser image is kind of unprofessional.When people feel threatened and shamed and can't find a rebuttal where they win they attack the man and not the argument.
Did you actually play the game though? The first questline in the entire game has you meeting a gay character in the starting region, and Geralt even has the ability to express his acceptance. And he's not even the only such character....
I've seen as much ITT, and I appreciate the inclusion of those characters. My problem's more with people who think that including minorities is "forcing" them or pushing an agenda, and that they're only there to fulfill a quota so that once you reach a certain amount of black people in RPGs that They aren't allowed to complain about diversity in gaming. Like, a lot of people in here seem to think that diversity will eventually be "completed", which isn't how it works. At all. Which is why it's disheartening to see things like "X, Y and Z already have characters A, B, and C, what more could you ask for?" meanwhile that poster's respective demographics have millions and millions of examples in games compared to maybe thousands if not less of other types.
Then The Witcher has sold millions of copies? They are catering to their audience. Point is it can't be everyone's audience or 40 million people would have bought it on PS4.
The Witcher never pretended to be set in an authentic medieval society. That world is full of anachronisms and if their scholars can have a fairly good grasp on modern sciences (even genetic engineering), it really shouldn't have to obey by any of our outdated rules.
I don't think I've trained my mind in such a way. I think that werewolves existing would have far far less of an impact on British society of the late 19th century than racial equality would have.
It's very strange that it comes from their official company account. Does it reflect the opinion of the entire team?Regardless if CDPR's games are sexist or not, here's my question:
Why would The Chinese Room want to start shit with another developer?
Are people aware that this is essentially a replication of an image from the original Cyberpunk 2020 role-playing game from the '90s?
Exactly.Screaming "sexist" without understanding the context is just irresponsible.
oh yes, of course, I can ignore it. I'm just expressing my opinion and besides, I think that I should say something so they know that at least not everyone agrees with them.You're free to ignore it if it bothers you so much.
Yeah but does that serve the story? throwing in positive representation is not what you want. What we need is for it to be a non noticeable thing and be apart of the norm within that story and not be paraded around. Just to have it.Reposting from the last page:
--
Why wouldn't a studio want to sell 40 million copies?
Yeah, this. The whole "it was a different time" argument just falls into the same bucket as the "werewolves would change Victorian England less than black people being given rights" fallacy:
I mean sure, it's based on medieval folklore except now people are using magic to modify the human genome, but hey, throwing in some positive representation? It's not the stone ages!
Regardless if CDPR's games are sexist or not, here's my question:
Why would The Chinese Room want to start shit with another developer?
Yeah i would hope so. It's a video game not a social experiment.
Reposting from the last page:
--
Why wouldn't a studio want to sell 40 million copies?
Yeah, this. The whole "it was a different time" argument just falls into the same bucket as the "werewolves would change Victorian England less than black people being given rights" fallacy:
I mean sure, it's based on medieval folklore except now people are using magic to modify the human genome, but hey, throwing in some positive representation? It's not the stone ages!
They have to find a way to be relevant, don't they?Regardless if CDPR's games are sexist or not, here's my question:
Why would The Chinese Room want to start shit with another developer?
I'd like to think we've come a long way in the past ~20 years, but maybe the '90s are only just coming to Poland?Are people aware that this is essentially a replication of an image from the original Cyberpunk 2020 role-playing game from the '90s?
.
It's very strange that it comes from their official company account. Does it reflect the opinion of the entire team?
FWIW, I know CDPR don't exactly have the best reputation when it comes to representation in their games. But for a studio to go up and call another's project 'sexist' based on an obscure teaser image is kind of unprofessional.
What if they do and still found it sexist?Screaming "sexist" without understanding the context is just irresponsible.
White men aren't an oppressed class in society.
Gratuitous sexual violence for the sake of gratuitous sexual violence is sexist.
I think the posts about scores are meant to imply that Chinese Room is just "picking on the top dog"What does not having made a game over 80 on metacritic have to do with that though? Would you have posted that if it was Naughty Dog who tweeted that?
It was a stupid thing to post on the companies twitter account but man all these "lol but you make shitty games" posts are just as stupid.
yeah wtf? have they been harboring some ill will towards them or something?
I love how when company accounts make sly jabs at MLG pros, rival game companies, introduce Gunnery Sergeant Baldwhites McBuzzkill as the protag of Space Raiders 4, etc. it's "wow getrekt 420 quickscope" and a good time is had by all, but the second a company injects """politics""" into the situation people try and place everything under an electron microscope to make sure that they keep their SJW agendas out of muh gaming.
Yeah, that's not what I said at all but you just keep on building your strawmen armyI love how when company accounts make sly jabs at MLG pros, rival game companies, introduce Gunnery Sergeant Baldwhites McBuzzkill as the protag of Space Raiders 4, etc. it's "wow getrekt 420 quickscope" and a good time is had by all, but the second a company injects """politics""" into the situation people try and place everything under an electron microscope to make sure that they keep their SJW agendas out of muh gaming.
I'm guessing you're also not a meatbag who was taken over by the robotic implants and went crazy killing people. Those type of lunacits are known for their sensible attire.
Then it's the shittiest and laziest way to do it. And put your name on the claim. Not the game company account.What if they do and still found it sexist?
The tweet implied that the person found the witcher games also be sexist so that image wouldn't exactly dissuade that opinion.
I take that back. But my point stands: accusing a fellow studio of sexism based on obscure material is completely unprofessional and irresponsible.What does not having made a game over 80 on metacritic have to do with that though? Would you have posted that if it was Naughty Dog who tweeted that?
It was a stupid thing to post on the companies twitter account but man all these "lol but you make shitty games" posts are just as stupid.
Says the studio who has yet to make a game with > 80 on Metacritic.