• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kotaku: XB1 Slim 2016, More Powerful XB1 Scorpio/VR 2017, iterative boxes from now on

Chris1

Member
I answered the question. Multiplayer has been a huge shift this gen to focus on 60FPS cap. IT WILL NOT INCREASE WITH THE NEW XBOX. A cap is a cap is a cap.

Done with this conversation.
Like Destiny? And I responded to that with the BO3 example of developers not giving a shit about last gen and pushing out any old shit just to make a quick buck, same thing will happen here once the Scorpio install base takes off and they start focusing on Scorpio. Just because a game has a cap of 60FPS doesn't mean the game actually runs at 60FPS. Well the Scorpio version might, lol.
 

Markoman

Member
Here is the upgrade cycle I'm going to be following in the future.

My Main Console: Buy an upgraded iterative console every 3 years.

My secondary console: Buy a new console every 6 years, mainly for exclusives.

Rince and repeat

It looks like instead of buying 2 consoles every 6 years I will be buying 3 every 6 years. An extra 400-500 dollars over a 6 year period isn't really that much money when you think about it.
I don't think there is enough reason to freak out over iterative consoles for me at least.

That's 8 full-priced games, my friend.
 

ironcreed

Banned
Which are all good things. But, just proves what I'm saying. They're pushing you away from console gaming.

Like others are saying if these things release every 3 or 4 years, fine I can work with that. But, every 1 or 2 years. Fuck no.

Even every 3-4 years is too much for me. I know I don't have to and all that, I just don't see the point. But for those that want to drop hundreds on a new system that often, then more power to them, I guess.
 

EvB

Member
The new Xbox will not be significantly more powerful then the neo. The jump will be bigger ten ps4 to neo though so it will be a significant boost in that regard.

but what ghz and CUs and RAMS extra does it take for it to go the extra 0.5.

How did they get to 360 and then go back?
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Like Destiny? And I responded to that with the BO3 example of developers not giving a shit about last gen and pushing out any old shit just to make a quick buck, same thing will happen here once the Scorpio install base takes off and they start focusing on Scorpio. Just because a game has a cap of 60FPS doesn't mean the game actually runs at 60FPS. Well the Scorpio version might, lol.

Both your 'examples' are not cross platform play. Thus they have no bearing on your argument/concern.
 

Pelagic

Banned
Imagine of Fanboy Wars:

Fanboy#1: Oh yes PS4k more powerful than Xbox one.

Fanboy#2: Yes but Xbox 1.5 is more powerful than PS4K in 2017

Fanboy#1: Oh yea? PS4.5k comes out in 2018 and blow the Xbox 1.5 out of the water.

Me: Wow.....

All these new consoles are like a dream come true for fanboys and comparison sites like Digital Foundry and NX Gamer.
People will be desperate to know which version runs the best/has the best grass etc. The comparision videos will be endless ;-)
 
I wanna see the receipts on that performance. That's a mobile APU. And it's more than the $300 he quoted.

I never said $300. He did.

Game debate says that PC can run the game "well" at low at 30fps. Since Qunatum break does move nicely before hitting slide shows on a laptop I tested it on which is weaker than this laptop, I believe it can run it.

Now keep in mind I did not say 1080p fps, with advanced textures and shaders. We are talking the lowest settings.
 

Kaako

Felium Defensor
Great. Just don't forget quality content and support is king.
MS, Facebook & Oculus partnership sounds like a match made in heaven.
 

16BitNova

Member
Even every 3-4 years is too much for me. I know I don't have to and all that, I just don't see the point. But for those that want to drop hundreds on a new system that often, then more power to them, I guess.

I'm with ya. I'm hoping its longer too, but I doubt it. And gaming is one of my favorite hobbies so at 4 years I may bite, at least on whichever console I play more. But, they are definitely going to lose some people, like yourself, if this is the route they choose.

Of course, until now there are surely many multiple console owners out there including myself. - WiiU, PS4 (+PC). From now on consumers will become even more dedicated brand loyalists ..."Will I give NX a chance or do I spend my money on the next PS upgrade".
It's an endgame....
No one on Gaf will convince me that this strategy will lead to market growth. It's basically roughly 200m (out of my booty figure) console people that are now being divided amongst more hw. And this is where the phone comparisson fails. Even the third world population is a vital part of the ww phone market. Consoles?...not even close.

Oh, definitely. If you think fanboyism and loyalist are bad now, the division this will cause is way worse. Hell, it may force some people who use to buy from all brands to have to become a loyalist themselves. Not many will spend so much, so often. This is the beginning of the end for one of these former power players.
 

ironcreed

Banned
Imagine of Fanboy Wars:

Fanboy#1: Oh yes PS4k more powerful than Xbox one.

Fanboy#2: Yes but Xbox 1.5 is more powerful than PS4K in 2017

Fanboy#1: Oh yea? PS4.5k comes out in 2018 and blow the Xbox 1.5 out of the water.

Me: Wow.....

LkQ.gif


Fuck all that noise.
 
I've got to wonder just how much this is costing them to develop and manufacture, and whether the money they'll make from the US and UK will be enough to make it back.

Overall, I'm very sceptical about whether any of this will work. They're very late to the media stick and set top box markets, and I'm not sure the few Xbox exclusive games those devices will offer will be enough to compete against the established names of Amazon Fire, Apple, Rhromecast and Roku.

The Xbox Slim is as dead in the water as the Xbox One, so that's neither here nor there, but the Two, that could go either way.

If they can position it as a Surface like, high end, entry level gaming PC with an Xbox 'pick up and play' level of simplicity built in to it, then it could be a damned fine product, and finally deliver on the promises of Steam Machines.

If it's just another new Xbox, but potentially even more off puttingly expensive than the XO was, that's going to be hilarious in a slow train wreck kind of way.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Great. Just don't forget quality content and support is king.
MS, Facebook & Oculus partnership sounds like a match made in heaven.

For them...

Sounds like a scarier utopian fear people had with 'always on/always listening', lol.
 
While I am not currently against the idea of iterative consoles (I really need MS/Sony/Nintendo to spell out what the plan is and how they plan to do it), I really cant see how any of the new tech like Neo/Scorpio will launch at what is perceived as a "consumer" price.

The argument will be that you dont have to upgrade but I am not confident at this stage that if you don't upgrade you will very quickly be hung out to dry with shitty ports and mass-downgrades and concessions. Each of them will say otherwise but I remain highly sceptical that non-upgraders get little more than a year of that platform being the "lead" platform.
 

Chris1

Member
Both your 'examples' are not cross platform play. Thus they have no bearing on your argument/concern.
BO3 was just an example of them not giving a shit about the weaker hardware and putting out anything to make a quick buck, and that's how it's gonna go down when the Scorpio releases, maybe not straight away but eventually once the Scorpio install base takes over and they start focusing on that, while putting out any old shit for the launch xbox one because they have to, even if it means running at half the FPS as the Scorpio one.

When they start increasing graphical fidelity for the Scorpio, you think they're gonna downgrade all the graphics to make launch xbox one look garbage? No, they'll use the roughly the same graphics at a lower resolution and lower frame rate since it won't be able to handle those graphics as smoothly as the Scorpio, eventually getting to the point where the framerate is garbage because they're trying to keep up with the graphics on Xbox scorpio.
 

//DEVIL//

Member
"Microsoft plans to move towards an incremental model, with more frequent hardware releases and games that are both forwards and backwards compatible across both Windows 10 and different Xbox models.""

fucking fucking fucking finally. this is what I wanted from consoles since forever. now I know I can play my games even if I bought a new console.

I can't stress how much I am happy with this news. day fucking one if its true. and I hope this Forces Sony to do the same.

Enough of this BS rebuying games I already own so I can play them on PS4 ( yes I am talking to you PS2 classics and PS3 remasters ) what a fucking rip off.
 
NEO this fall and Scorpio next fall sounds about right. If Sony were to release an iterative model of PS4 there's no doubt in my mind MS would follow with their own iterative hardware. MS has been following Sony's lead for years now.
 

jelly

Member
I've got to wonder just how much this is costing them to develop and manufacture, and whether the money they'll make from the US and UK will be enough to make it back.

Overall, I'm very sceptical about whether any of this will work. They're very late to the media stick and set top box markets, and I'm not sure the few Xbox exclusive games those devices will offer will be enough to compete against the established names of Amazon Fire, Apple, Rhromecast and Roku.

The Xbox Slim is as dead in the water as the Xbox One, so that's neither here nor there, but the Two, that could go either way.

If they can position it as a Surface like, high end, entry level gaming PC with an Xbox 'pick up and play' level of simplicity built in to it, then it could be a damned fine product, and finally deliver on the promises of Steam Machines.

If it's just another new Xbox, but potentially even more off puttingly expensive than the XO was, that's going to be hilarious in a slow train wreck kind of way.

I agree, it's a busy market but there is two key factors that the Xbox console has always excelled at, variety of streaming apps way ahead of others during the 360 era and doesn't play favourites. While Amazon begrudgingly has Netflix, it doesn't have others whereas Xbox has always welcomed everyone. Remains to be seen if that plays with a streaming stick but that's what I always liked about Xbox streaming.
 

prwxv3

Member
"Microsoft plans to move towards an incremental model, with more frequent hardware releases and games that are both forwards and backwards compatible across both Windows 10 and different Xbox models.""

fucking fucking fucking finally. this is what I wanted from consoles since forever. now I know I can play my games even if I bought a new console.

I can't stress how much I am happy with this news. day fucking one if its true. and I hope this Forces Sony to do the same.

Enough of this BS rebuying games I already own so I can play them on PS4 ( yes I am talking to you PS2 classics and PS3 remasters ) what a fucking rip off.

Wat. There is no forcing sony. That is he plan for the neo.
 

HUELEN10

Member
Possible iterative Playsation, possible iterative Xbox, NX possibly being an architecture for consoles instead of a console, announced before all this....


Did... Did Nintendo bet on the right horse?!?!?
 

Jerm411

Member
I'm super curious to see what they'll price the Slim or whatever it's called at and if it gets paired with an upcoming release....I'm already going to get one but I'd also be all in on a Gears 4 or Sea of Thieves or Crackdown, etc. special edition Slim.
 

Welfare

Member
Why is it that every thread on incremental hardware there is this slippery slope of yearly refreshes? Makes no sense.
 

AmyS

Member
IGN and Arstechnica are both running with this news.

Arstechnica:

Reports: Microsoft preparing multiple Xbox upgrades over next two years

Anonymous sources suggest a slim 2016 console could precede a VR-ready upgrade next year.

A pair of reports from anonymous Microsoft sources suggest the company is preparing to launch at least one downsized version of the Xbox One later this year and a more powerful, potentially VR-capable version of the console next year.

Kotaku cites "three people familiar" with the matter describing the new, more powerful Xbox One model. Codenamed Scorpio, this version is set for 2017 release according to the report. Kotaku writes that the console will be able to support the Oculus Rift, and it could have a GPU technically capable of supporting 4K resolutions. This year, meanwhile, the anonymous sources suggest Microsoft will release a cheaper, smaller Xbox One, perhaps with an upgraded 2TB hard drive.

Elsewhere, Brad Sams at the Microsoft-focused Thurott Report posted a podcast with similar but slightly different information on Microsoft's Xbox hardware plans. Sams' sources suggest that Microsoft will announce two "miniature" Xbox systems for release this year. The smaller one (priced around $100) will reportedly be a streaming-focused stick comparable to devices like the Chromecast and Amazon Fire. The larger one, coming in "a little bit smaller than a large lunchbox," might be able to play "lightweight" Windows Store games thanks to Microsoft's recent integration with Universal Windows apps, Sams suggested.

As for next year's Xbox upgrade, Sams' sources suggest it could have a "completely new architecture" and "VR might be built in," but the report had little in the way of concrete info.

more here: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/...g-multiple-xbox-upgrades-over-next-two-years/


IGN:
SMALLER XBOX REPORTEDLY COMING IN 2016, MORE POWERFUL 'SCORPIO' IN 2017

Reports say Microsoft is going to be releasing two new Xbox One models over the next two years.

According to Kotaku, three anonymous sources have spoken about a smaller, cheaper Xbox One which will release this year, with one of the sources saying it will contain a larger 2TB hard drive.

Next year, we'll reportedly be getting a more powerful version of the Xbox One, codenamed "Scorpio," with a better GPU that can handle 4K resolutions. Sources say there are no current plans to upgrade the I/O speed of the console in addition to the GPU, which could mean longer load times.

The sources also say Microsoft is seeking to form a partnership with Oculus, and next year's Scorpio model could support the Oculus Rift. However neither Microsoft nor Oculus have provided comment on this yet.

All of Microsoft's plans are apparently part of a "Project Helix" strategy to unify Xbox and Windows. Developer sources told Kotaku Microsoft plans to release future games, including the likes of Halo, on both platforms.

IGN's article here: http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05...-coming-in-2016-more-powerful-scorpio-in-2017
 

Markoman

Member
I'm with ya. I'm hoping its longer too, but I doubt it. And gaming is one of my favorite hobbies so at 4 years I may bite, at least on whichever console I play more. But, they are definitely going to lose some people, like yourself, if this is the route they choose.



Oh, definitely. If you think fanboyism and loyalist are bad now, the division this will cause is way worse. Hell, it may force some people who use to buy from all brands to have to become a loyalist themselves. Not many will spend so much, so often. This is the beginning of the end for one of these former power players.

And what really baffles me here on Gaf is that many are saying that spending more on hw over time is ok. Now imagine the prices of AAA games being raised by 10$. Meltdowns! Shouldn't the money go where it truely belongs? Games! Imagine how much better the software development would run if the market accepted a 10-20$ raise instead of people spending 400$ every 3-4 years instead of every 5-6 years. That's what I call double standards. People praise this whole thing as some kind of modern revolution. How is having plattform-holders gating away entertainment content modern? Oh I really hope this will eventually lead to gaming-as-a-service - a one box plays all scenario.
 

jelly

Member
NEO this fall and Scorpio next fall sounds about right. If Sony were to release an iterative model of PS4 there's no doubt in my mind MS would follow with their own iterative hardware. MS has been following Sony's lead for years now.

Come on, that's nonsense. I would have loved it if they did follow them this generation though!
 

SpecX

Member
Imagine of Fanboy Wars:

Fanboy#1: Oh yes PS4k more powerful than Xbox one.

Fanboy#2: Yes but Xbox 1.5 is more powerful than PS4K in 2017

Fanboy#1: Oh yea? PS4.5k comes out in 2018 and blow the Xbox 1.5 out of the water.

Me: Wow.....

Where does Nintendo fall in all of this? Kind of looks like Sony and MS are squeezing them out of the .5 upgrade game.
 

V-Faction

Member
Had only one company been planning to do this, I'd say it was an inevitable failure.

If all the companies pull this off, then the playing field is even.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Why is it that every thread on incremental hardware there is this slippery slope of yearly refreshes? Makes no sense.

"The sky is falling!"

On a side note...

Some do not want us to compare this to cell phones as far as same ecosystem, people have no issues waiting or upgrading often, yet they don't want to denounce the 'yearly iteration' argument of fear/concern either. Fancy that one, eh?
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
If the plan for both Sony and Microsoft is to do upgrades every 3rd year say then surely explaining things on the biggest stage in E3 is a must.

Them both doing what they've done in the past with slims of announcing them 2-4 weeks before going on sale would be a disaster?
 
Top Bottom