Leona Lewis
Banned
Shrewd isn't leaking your specs so early that the competition has enough time to adjust its own.If it's controlled then I can at least respect that as a shrewd move on MS's part.
Shrewd isn't leaking your specs so early that the competition has enough time to adjust its own.If it's controlled then I can at least respect that as a shrewd move on MS's part.
I want Sony to be on the defensive. They're at their best when they are. Take 'em to town MSFT.
Just imagine this with the infinite power of the cloud!
Shrewd isn't leaking your specs so early that the competition has enough time to adjust its own.
You guys should read SPE's latest post:
It's at least not a bad idea to wait since we have 3 new consoles on the horizon. It's such an odd situationlooks like I might pass on neo and get scorpio.
The time difference between this leak and the Neo's release is probably about the same as the time from the Neo's to Scorpio's release. So I don't understand this concernShrewd isn't leaking your specs so early that the competition has enough time to adjust its own.
But how much would lower be? Assuming everything was the same for the Xbox One, bad reveal, launch in tiny amount of countries, and $100 more expensive because of forced Kinect, the amount of consoles that would be flipped would be insignificant.
A more powerful XB1 requires a completely different machine and marketing than what actually happened, and how that would have gone is a different discussion.
1.31 vs 6 Tflops...
I wanna see how the games will be for run in both systems.
It'll be like PC games for awhile, higher res/textures/framerate, stuff that peeps have been complaining about since the start. VR will be important, and MS can 1up Sony with Rift support.
It's at least not a bad idea to wait since we have 3 new consoles on the horizon. It's such an odd situation
looks like I might pass on neo and get scorpio.
I want Sony to be on the defensive. They're at their best when they are. Take 'em to town MSFT.
I want Sony to be on the defensive. They're at their best when they are. Take 'em to town MSFT.
By the time the Scorpio's out we're already going to be hearing rumours about the PS5, or PS4.5K or however it shakes out. The move to iterative consoles means there's never going to be a 'safe' time to jump in; just like with PC hardware there's always going to be the next thing just over the horizon.
By the time the Scorpio's out we're already going to be hearing rumours about the PS5, or PS4.5K or however it shakes out. The move to iterative consoles means there's never going to be a 'safe' time to jump in; just like with PC hardware there's always going to be the next thing just over the horizon.
I want Sony to be on the defensive. They're at their best when they are. Take 'em to town MSFT.
It's not gonna happen this gen. So best to keep your expectations low.
I don't think would be insignificant. One of the reasons for hardcore players rush for a PS4 was the power. Combined with the lower price was an easy decision.
If Xbox One had a better hardware, part of the people would think in pay $100 more for a better machine and after the price drop (that likely would happen anyway because bundle w/ Kinect was a stupid idea) Xbox One would be very competitive.
PS4 would be the leader because of the worldwide presence, but Xbox One would be doing significantly better than now in markets like North America and UK.
Before E3 2017, Kotaku: PS4 Trinity will be a 12TF machine announce soon, release fall 2018.
Let him dream. Dreams 2.0 is right around the corner I hear lmao.It's not gonna happen this gen. So best to keep your expectations low.
Take 'em to town MSFT, and while your at it, bring us back the DRM/always online when you had Sony on the defensive, lol.
I can't fucking wait to see how this affects the graphics in future titles. Consoles having such great graphics power could bring PC graphics further faster.
It's a win win for everyone.
I don't think would be insignificant. One of the reasons for hardcore players rush for a PS4 was the power. Combined with the lower price was an easy decision.
If Xbox One had a better hardware, part of the people would think in pay $100 more for a better machine and after the price drop (that likely would happen anyway because bundle w/ Kinect was a stupid idea) Xbox One would be very competitive.
PS4 would be the leader because of the worldwide presence, but Xbox One would be doing significantly better than now in markets like North America and UK.
Not really. You're telling people who bought a PS4/XB1 recently that no, you didn't buy the best, you bought relegated hardware. Increasing graphics at this point is pointless. Increasing how fast Nvidia ups the prices on their GPU in the future is also terrible for consumers, because AMD sure as hell isn't competing with them in that space.
I think the "console generation" definition will be over soon, at least in the traditional way. If this iteration model works out for them then we will see both companies try their best every years.
That supposed Nintendo deal seems to suggest they got heated from all the current AMD console wins.Good news for gaming hardware in general. This competition is great. I like to think it'll help NVIDIA from getting too comfy.
Hold up, this doesn't make any sense. You can apply this logic to the PS4 and PS4 Neo. Why bother w/ PS4 in the next few months if I can buy one that's 2-3 as powerful for $100 more?
Hmmm, why would I buy a PS4 now if I know Neo is coming out "this year"? Given that the price difference between the two is probably no more than $100-$150 I would just forego purchase a PS4.
I think the "console generation" definition will be over soon, at least in the traditional way. If this iteration model works out for them then we will see both companies try their best every years.
Take 'em to town MSFT, and while your at it, bring us back the DRM/always online when you had Sony on the defensive, lol.
Umm it's one thing to have a monopoly it's another to price your product so high the consumers can't afford it. Anyway 4 years is a good run.
Nvidia already produces $1,000 plus GPU's and they've been increasing their prices ever-so-slightly recently. If PS4K/XB2 try to hurt their business by making older GPU's weaker, they'll bump it up because they know their customers (PC Gamers) except the best. Them being a monopoly on PC doesn't help matters, either.
I honestly wouldn't mind some of what they had planned. Some stuff about it was extremely shitty though.
How much of that is cloud computing huh!
The GTX TitanX wasn't intended for consumers
Are PS4 games backwards compatible with the NEO?
Are PS4 games backwards compatible with the NEO?
Nothing is stoping them from implementing the positive things without the need for the negative right now. In other words, they were blowing smoke to lessen the outrage. They could not even detail any of the claims, and the info was patchy at best.
uhm, It's not cheap to have a GPU that could push those figures. The XO isn't doing so hot right now to be demanding $600+ from consumers, but we will see.
uhm, It's not cheap to have a GPU that could push those figures. The XO isn't doing so hot right now to be demanding $600+ from consumers, but we will see.