Just wait. More announcements are coming soonNo Battlefront? This still gets DLC, so why no Neo-Mode?
Just wait. More announcements are coming soonNo Battlefront? This still gets DLC, so why no Neo-Mode?
As many others have said already, the notable lack of Bloodborne is agonizing.
Don't count on it. Sony confirmed that framerate has to be the same on PS4 and Pro. Bloodborne is always online (by design, only offline if you opt out). Upscaling? Sure. 60fps? No.
Really hope that Fallout 4 and Witcher 3 get upgraded.
Just for your informaton: All games after late september must ship with a PS4 Pro mode.
I'm confused since Sony said they can choose to do 4K pro mode or 1080. Are they not required to do both? Like do they not have to support two Pro modes, being one which is high fidelity 1080p and one that's 4K? It doesn't really sound like they're required to support both ideas and could just do a 4K mode or a 1080p+ mode and that would count as having a Pro mode?
This is very misleading, while all games must have a Pro mode there's no enforcement on Sony's part to make the Pro mode better, so for all you know the Pro mode can very well be a carbon copy of the PS4 mode.
Understand this or there will be another drama like native 4k vs upscaled 4k.
What exactly is "Pro mode" again?
Sorry, I've been out of the loop.
Do you think it might be worth saying what the upgrades do?
(better textures, higher frame rates, true 4K, fancy-upscale to 4K etc)
High fidelity 1080p will require developer to put more work and resource adding effects or better asset etc. There's no way Sony can enforce that to all developers. Simply having higher resolution and then upscale or downscale to 4k or 1080p seems like the most dev friendly way.I'm confused since Sony said they can choose to do 4K pro mode or 1080. Are they not required to do both? Like do they not have to support two Pro modes, being one which is high fidelity 1080p and one that's 4K? It doesn't really sound like they're required to support both ideas and could just do a 4K mode or a 1080p+ mode and that would count as having a Pro mode?
Asked in the other thread too-
Any chance that even if a developer DOES NOT patch anything on an old game, it will perform better simply because of the better GPU and overclocked CPU (basically, more consistently hitting its performance targets)? Fallout 4 looking at you....
Asked in the other thread too-
Any chance that even if a developer DOES NOT patch anything on an old game, it will perform better simply because of the better GPU and overclocked CPU (basically, more consistently hitting its performance targets)? Fallout 4 looking at you....
I hope devs pay attention to the fact that 95% of the market or more still aren't using 4K TVs. I want devs like Square to make FFXV 1080p amazing on Pro.
I think Cerny said as much that if there's no patch, the game will still continue to work as it does on a normal PS4. The only extra advantage might be that the pro will upscale the image to 4k (?)
As many others have said already, the notable lack of Bloodborne is agonizing.
Done!Minor suggestion...can you include references when things get added to list? I know the top ones were all revealed during conference and ESO had a youtube trailer, but didn't know where to look for the F1 info. Sources would be cool if you have time
Thanks for making the list though!
Yes please!!SFV and Bloodborne are necessities ...
SFV and Bloodborne are necessities ...
I really hope DICE go back and give Battlefield 4 and Battlefront a boost to 1080p60.
Thanks for making a better thread than the one before.
I don't know how Bloodborne will be updated if online FPS must match the PS4. Unless you're just hoping for framerate pacing fix & better graphics.
I think OP should add titles from this picture from PS Asia conference.
Yeah.I find the whole "must have the same fps on both consoles for multiplayer" a bit of a bullshit statement, used soley to appease those who aren't getting a Pro. The "fairness" concept is blown out of the window when you consider crossplay.
I find the whole "must have the same fps on both consoles for multiplayer" a bit of a bullshit statement, used soley to appease those who aren't getting a Pro. The "fairness" concept is blown out of the window when you consider crossplay.
What's next, saying that you can't play fighting games with anything other than a DS4 for "fairness"?
I think OP should add titles from this picture from PS Asia conference.
It depends on the developer. They can have one size fits all NEO mode, they can have 2, 3,4,5,6 it doesn't matter generally speaking, and all of them can do different things to take advantage of the power increase.
Also, its not an upscale, the frame takes two images and blends them together for additional information, an upscale is taking a single image and blowing it up.
The inclusion of Shadow of Mordor is so odd to me if it isn't a case of raising hype/market awareness for the presumed sequel set for next year. Here's hoping MKX or even Arkham Knight gets Pro support at some point.
Oh man, that'd be glorious. The game already looks terrific on the PS4 as it is. I haven't actually played much of it yet, but it'd be cool if a patch came out before I got around to it. Sony seems to have a good relationship with WB, and Rocksteady is making that Arkham VR game after all. Maybe once that's done they can work on a patch.Here's hoping MKX or even Arkham Knight gets Pro support at some point.
When is the cutoff for requiring a pro mode?
Nba 2k16 releases sep 16. I'm assuming it's a no on that one?
Really hope that Fallout 4 and Witcher 3 get upgraded.