• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ReCore ReView thread

Ascenion

Member
What in the world...


In your logic, a grade of 60 or below shouldn't be failing in university using 0-100 scales, since the student is "above average"

A 60 isn't failing, it's a D. It's not the best grade but if that class isn't in your major fuck it, the D is fine just don't get too many.
 

Shiggy

Member
Point is everyone screaming it's below average when the used score system says otherwise. I mean sure, if you take everything it is, but individually it's still above a 5 on the critic scale.

Everyone knows that few to no review sites give out 0, 1 or 2s or even 5s. A game with a score of 7 is therefore pretty much considered average, which is also in line with OpenCritic. It's not a good game.


Not to mention if you only give select games review usually you pick good games (or high cost ones with a lot of marketing behind it) which usually will go above the default critic score line.

How does this game fare overall to all the other $40 games?

Pretty much all console games get a review score. And it's mostly those games which are relevant for the audience on here and in core or hardcore gaming.

Not sure what you want in terms of price. A (not really) low price doesn't make an average game good.
 
another miss for a sony/ms first party title. truly the worst gen in terms of exclusives.

I have to agree but I also feel this has been the most underwhelming gen overall in my life time. I think Sony offers more diversity to be honest but that doesn't mean high quality and MS are far too predictable for my liking.
 
Anticipated? I've yet to purchase it and barely even cared until I saw the stream which looked interesting.

You can see it how you want, but the inherent median score system is super flawed considering only a small % of actual released games get properly reviewed if you look at the daily trash that is released.

I will however purchase it on UWP as it looks like a alright game while waiting for Mafia and such.

Nobody cares how games relate to trash they've never heard of and aren't going to play. It's not a flaw at all to not throw a bunch of shit down at the bottom of the scale so you have some kind of balance. The grading scale could literally be between 39.6 and 44.7 and it wouldn't matter. You look at the score, understand how that score relates to how every other game has been scored since the history of game reviews, and that's all the information you need.

You're trying to argue semantics because you can't seem to understand what's actually happening.
 

Zafir

Member
Go to Gamespot and sort reviews by score. In the modern day, 7 is average.
I'd say it is actually getting closer to 6.5.

It definitely used to be 7 a few years ago, but reviewers have gotten a bit harsher. Probably due to all the lashback that they got for 'not using all of the scale'.

A 60 isn't failing, it's a D. It's not the best grade but if that class isn't in your major fuck it, the D is fine just don't get too many.

The funny thing is, 60%-70% is actually considered a good pass from Universities in the UK. :p
 

Tecnniqe

Banned
Everyone knows that few to no review sites give out 0, 1 or 2s or even 5s. A game with a score of 7 is therefore pretty much considered average, which is also in line with OpenCritic. It's not a good game.

But isn't that the point I tried to make with moving the score from 0-10 to 2-12 instead? That way the score system makes sense again :)

Ahhh it's all a mess, as for the price it's fine IMO, it doesn't need to be a great game, just keep me busy for a few hours. I was just curious how the score average is between $40 titles as there have been a good few.
 
I'm saying the industry's standard scale which have always been 0-10 is the norm and a such 5 is the average score.

I bet you're open critic scores would go down rapidly if they started reviewing steam trash, and as such it's fluctuating while the old ass system still works, as the rating is based on their time and makes the most sense.


A game getting 7 all across the board should not make it "average" as it would be above on the rating system they use.

A 70% in school was a C which was average which was not a good score.

A 50% would be a fail.
 

Garlador

Member
That Prismatic Core stuff at the end sounds an awful lot like the keys you have to find in the Metroid Prime series. What is their obsession with that?

Just what I was thinking. "Hey guys, let's take the most unfavorable part of Metroid Prime and do it again, only much worse!"

I'm perturbed... One one hand, we have Metroid Prime Federation Force imploding on impact, and on the other we have some of the guys behind Metroid Prime making a game that's imploding on impact.

Either way, it feels like some sort of Metroid-curse like a vengeful pharaoh going after the people who desecrated its legacy or abandoned him.
 
I'd say it is actually getting closer to 6.5.

It definitely used to be 7 a few years ago, but reviewers have gotten a bit harsher. Probably due to all the lashback that they got for 'not using all of the scale'.



The funny thing is, 60%-70% is actually considered a good pass from Universities in the UK. :p

Part of it is the death of AA games (kinda like ReCore). You had tons more AA games in the PS2 era, so when the AAA juggernauts came out, they were guaranteed that top end of the spectrum. Now that the games that took up the 6-8 range have disappeared, AAA games have spread out along the scale and it takes a lot more to stand out and hit the high end.
 
At the first reveal I was really interested in this game but we only saw a trailer. When we saw more information at the last E3 I wasn't sure how I felt and it looked a little rough. This past week I have been watching people play the game and for some reason it has really drawn me in. The downfalls are obvious but the game simply looks fun. These reviews are a little worrisome but I still think I'm going to have fun with this game. I'm going to purchase it and give it a shot.
 

Shiggy

Member
A 60 is a B in Europe so I think trying to apply school grade analogies to videogames should be avoided!

Where is that in Europe? Not the countries I lived in.


But isn't that the point I tried to make with moving the score from 0-10 to 2-12 instead? That way the score system makes sense again :)

Ahhh it's all a mess, as for the price it's fine IMO, it doesn't need to be a great game, just keep me busy for a few hours. I was just curious how the score average is between $40 titles as there have been a good few.

You achieve the same by ranking average scores in percentiles as on Open Critic. That way you can identify stinkers despite score inflation.

40 EUR might be fine for you. At the same time, you can get some great titles at that price or less. You can also get shittier titles for more.
 

Maffis

Member
The game never looked like a AAA-game from the beginning. The 40 dollar price tag makes it more bearable to deal with some of the jankiness. I'm surprised the game is so long however. I didn't expect a 20 hour campaign on a 40 dollar game. I hope some patches in the future can help with the loading times and I really hope the game runs well on my PC.

I have to say though that the score disparity between reviewers are pretty high. From low 3's to 8's. Kind of hard to judge quality from that. Jim's review with a 7/10 looks really promising though. AA-platformer like from the golden era with some jank, seems right with a 7.
 

Noobcraft

Member
A 60 is a B in Europe so I think trying to apply school grade analogies to videogames should be avoided!
Like a 60/100? Because here in the States as a white male the average GPA to get into Medical School is like 3.7 on a 4.0 scale. Which is pretty is pretty much 93% or higher in every class o_o
 

Montresor

Member
Very disappointing, but then again my tastes rarely align with metacritic. The written content of the reviews seem to describe a fun game (in my eyes), so I`m hoping I enjoy the game.
 

prwxv3

Member
The game never looked like a AAA-game from the beginning. The 40 dollar price tag makes it more bearable to deal with some of the jankiness. I'm surprised the game is so long however. I didn't expect a 20 hour campaign on a 40 dollar game. I hope some patches in the future can help with the loading times and I really hope the game runs well on my PC.

I have to say though that the score disparity between reviewers are pretty high. From low 3's to 8's. Kind of hard to judge quality from that. Jim's review with a 7/10 looks really promising though. AA-platformer like from the golden era with some jank, seems right with a 7.

The reveal trailer made it look like a AAA game. Though no one should make expectations based on a CG trailer.
 

drotahorror

Member
A 70% in school was a C which was average which was not a good score.

A 50% would be a fail.

Are you in the US? Have they changed rating scale since I've been to school?

It was always like this for me up til high school:

65-73 = D
74-82 = C
83-91 = B
92-100 = A

*I see it is different now on wikipedia.
 
What? No.

AAA titles will almost always get 100%, since unless they're absolutely hot garbage they won't get below a 60 or 70... That would be a terrible gauge of quality.

RT doesn't automatically assume that 60 or 70s are fresh, you can still submit it as rotten.
 

Shiggy

Member
Like a 60/100? Because here in the States as a white male the average GPA to get into Medical School is like 3.7 on a 4.0 scale. Which is pretty is pretty much 90% or higher in every class o_o

In Sweden and Germany it's definitely not. There you often fail with 40-60℅.
 
Top Bottom