Usually, Game Mode has less lag, but depending on the screen, it fucks up all of your settings, increases sharpness, messes up colour temperate etc.
PC mode usually tries its best to give you the most accurate picture I find. No overscan, SRGB, 4:4:4 chroma etc. and this tends to have less lag (although sometimes game can have even less but personally I don't think it's worthwhile).
Sometimes, though, Game Mode COMPLETELY fucks with your picture. I see this shit on Gaming Monitors usually. Ugly as fuck.
just checked, input lag on my TV in PC mode is 34.9 ms; Game mode is 26.4 ms. is that difference even noticeable? lol
and yeah the difference in sharpness between the two modes is pretty shocking.
![]()
How GAF likes to view content
People love their red-ish greys.After reading this thread I've gone from Standard to Warm 1. Warm 2 just looks like a piss filter.
Apple devices tend to come fairly well calibrated by default ... I've always assumed that's a big reason why people like Apple products without them necessarily realising it.
I play Cool. Hate whites looking yellowed. I want them pure or bleached
No kidding, I had no idea this was true:Marketers have ruined everything.
Just the name warm 2 makes it sound like some 3200k setting or something.Proper computer monitors are all 6500K. Warm 2 is 6500K.
Give me cool or give me nothing!
My man.
Warm looks like a piss filter.
Fascinating. This makes me wish Apple made TVs, because at least then there'd be a popular, properly calibrated standard for people to compare against.Not only is the hardware carefully designed for accurate representation, but the entire software stack is color managed with every single color value and bitmap carrying color space information that is matched at output. Not a lot of people realize what a big difference this makes.
One of the most recent devices, the 9.7" iPad Pro goes a step further by monitoring ambient light and adjusting color temperature on the fly so that on-screen images will look as similar as possible to objects in the world around us.
Our visual apparatus is incredibly adaptable, as evidenced by the wide range of experiences in this thread, allowing us to see "white" in a wide range of color temperatures. What we can't do is see two different colors as white simultaneously. D65 is the white point used by anyone doing professional work viewed on screen (printed material is usually calibrated to the much warmer D50 to cope with the dreadfully warm light spectrum most indoor lighting puts out.) As virtually everyone else with some real experience in the field here relates, D65 is generally closest to what you get with Warm2 settings. Your eyes can adjust to much warmer or cooler light, but it skews toward the edges of the accurately representable color gamut and is not a match for authorial intent.
You've been deceived by decades of advertisers telling you to get your clothes or teeth their whitest and showing you an overtly blue image as "white." It's a trick of perception that it takes a little bit to unlearn, but it's totally worth rediscovering true daylight white.
Fascinating. This makes me wish Apple made TVs, because at least then there'd be a popular, properly calibrated standard for people to compare against.
This thread has made me very angry with TV manufacturers. Why not just make the standard setting have the correct colour temperature and gamma? Why use confusing labels like cool, neutral and warm? Why even have any other setting but the one content is made for?
Fascinating. This makes me wish Apple made TVs, because at least then there'd be a popular, properly calibrated standard for people to compare against.
This thread has made me very angry with TV manufacturers. Why not just make the standard setting have the correct colour temperature and gamma? Why use confusing labels like cool, neutral and warm? Why even have any other setting but the one content is made for?
A few have, and the consensus is 6500k, which is typically Warm/Warm 2 on TVs. My girlfriend is a 3D artist at a game studio and they take display calibration very seriously.Personal preference is why. Not everyone likes Warm/Warm 2. Even though it is the closest to reference and taking into account other settings on the TV.
There are people and I have been to friends places where they have the set on Vivid (Torch) mode and they love it that way. I could never watch TV in Vivid let alone gaming on a set in Vivid mode. Same with Cool, it just looks horrible to me and makes things look really off.
I would rather have the ability to change settings rather than have a TV that is set one way and no way to change it.
Really wish a dev or two would come in and let us know when they are creating the game what temp they make the game in.
Natural or Warm, the rest mess with colours regardless of what experts say.
I use 6500k calibrated mode on my IPS laptop, Warm 1 on my 2009 Panasonic plasma (Warm 2 is too greenish/yellow, common issue with the set) and *Computer for my Vizio 2015 E Series 32" which edges out the Warm setting, use it solely for a secondary screen on the PC. The Vizio is definitely the worst looking of the bunch if you have all 3 together. Laptop screen and the Panny trade blows with varying content.
Noone should be using Cool 2 or 1 or Normal/Neutral. Even if warm looks too yellow, try it for a week and it will be hard to go back unless your TV is absolutely fucked in the calibration department, then I don't know. That would suck.
Maybe I'm dense, but I don't follow this at all. My TV (Panasonic Viera) has 3 colour temp settings; Cool, Normal and Warm. I just assumed Normal is the most balanced setting, and Cool or Warm are more extreme either way. Looks that way when I switch between them.
Warm is actually the best colour balance?
What? 6500k rec709 is the standard.Fascinating. This makes me wish Apple made TVs, because at least then there'd be a popular, properly calibrated standard for people to compare against.
As in, there would be a popular TV available (assuming popular because Apple) that would be properly calibrated, so people would have a point of comparison and look at their TVs at home and be like, "What have I been doing with my life, I feel infinite shame."What? 6500k rec709 is the standard.
I wonder why Cool 1 and 2 settings exist, if (according to this thread) they provide the most inaccurate results when trying to properly display natural looking colors. It's like TV manufacturers decided to have a "fuck up my whole shit, fam" setting.
Warm 2 for life
With all the talk of 4k, HDR etc. with the release of Xbox One S & PS4 Pro/PS4 HDR update, I was wondering what developers suggest to consumers the proper color temperature for our sets? I know that movie studios author their movies in the Warm/Warm 2 setting or Expert/Expert 1 (different TV's call it different things). But I never heard from a developer when they make a game what color temp. do they create the game in.
Can any devs offer input on what is the preferred color temperature we should have our sets in? I know the majority of retailers have TV's displayed using "torch" mode where everything is blown out and the color temp is set to Cool, but this adds a blue hue to everything and does not look natural and taking personal preferences to color temperature as each person may like different things aside, what do dev's recommend as the best color temp so the game looks like the artist/dev's intended them to look?
Fascinating. This makes me wish Apple made TVs, because at least then there'd be a popular, properly calibrated standard for people to compare against.
This thread has made me very angry with TV manufacturers. Why not just make the standard setting have the correct colour temperature and gamma? Why use confusing labels like cool, neutral and warm? Why even have any other setting but the one content is made for?