If your display isn't calibrated to D65, Rec 709 and 2.2 gamma then it is in fact "wrong."
Anything else wouldn't be calibrated to accepted standards for HD content, sure. For UHD content I'd argue you should calibrate for Rec 2020 or at least DCI-P3 instead and rely on colorspace transformations to accurately represent Rec 709 content since their relationships are well defined.
I don't get why people keep coming in here and pretending there isn't an objectively correct answer to this question. In your examples it is the environment that is the issue and not the display.
... and I don't get people asserting that others are living their lives wrong. There are plenty of people who aren't planning to rearrange their home to guarantee a neutral viewing environment with D65 lighting. Whether that's due to personal preference or a different set of economic priorities is pretty much irrelevant. Is there anything actually incorrect about my representation of color theory and human color perception, or are you just parroting the same pedantic line you've heard from others? It makes sense to follow standards obsessively in content production. In content consumption there's no real reason to make the same assertion.
Lady, I suggest you just take the time to calibrate your screens so you can have accurate colour rather than justifying your preference for bad colours.
I suggest you stop bring a presumptive jerk. My screens are carefully calibrated to standards because I care about both the theory and the practice of content capture, editing, and reproduction. On the other hand, I also value personal freedoms and while I'd suggest others give D65 white balance a try to see if they find it less fatiguing due to being more in keeping with an daylight environment, I'm not going to insist that my way is the only way.