-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Laura Dale: 2 Switch SKUs planned, UK Retailer GAME will sell at £199.99 and £249.99
- Thread starter Richie
- Start date
Shikamaru Ninja
任天å ã® å¿è
I'm not proposing a 6 month price drop like the 3DS suffered because of its intolerable launch line up and stagnant sequence of games. The Switch can survive through 2017 easily at a base $249 based on the software schedule it potentially has, and its much more varied function as a machine.
Principate
Saint Titanfall
They probably will eventually just at launch they don't want to deal with the marketing nightmare that would involve
Ah interesting if true. Since the announce I've been thinking that £250 had to be the price point for maximum effect. Higher would be a harder sell as that would push it into PS4/Xbone territory.
So far there doesn't appear to be the classic Nintendo twist (e.g. Classic NES cable length lol). Here's hoping they hit a home run!
So far there doesn't appear to be the classic Nintendo twist (e.g. Classic NES cable length lol). Here's hoping they hit a home run!
Azure Phoenix
Member
Sure, I'd pay £249 as long as the reveal trailer was correct and there will be ports of Mario Kart 8, Splatoon and Skyrim. I can't say I'm excited about the Switch at all, but I still like Splatoon and sold my Wii U the other day before the price crashes.
You mean $245 as the dock is probably adding $5 to the cost.
NOLA_Gaffer
Banned
Hopefully the pack-in game is as amazing as Nintendoland was. That shit STILL gets brought out on a regular basis for gettogethers.
sir_bumble_bee
Member
This is my take as well. A steady pace of quality first party titles throughout the year to keep Nintendo fans buying, and then in 2018 start introducing more SKUs. Hopefully by then third parties will start becoming established and keep up with the software output.
Spine_Ripper
Member
While that's probably true, we all know that's not how this game works lol
frankie_baby
Member
wouldn't be surprised to see a more traditional handheld variant hit later, maybe next xmas or early 2018, non-detatchable controllers, slightly smaller screen, die-shrunk chips and slightly better battery life for like $150
Jorok Goldblade
Member
It's most likely either going to be Mario Kart or the new Mario game.
That a good reason, but my closest friends aren't gamers. In the end, it's useless for me.
frankie_baby
Member
199 pounds is 198 dollars after tax is taken off
Won't do me any good when barely anyone buys Nintendo consoles.
Stone Ocean
Member
Is there actually any chance this will be $200 in NA? Because I would lose my shit
serenewarfare
Banned
No. They aren't going to sell it to consumers at the wholesale price.
I hope so. I got The Wind Waker HD for free when I bought the console bundled with Mario Kart 8 and I enjoyed my summer with these two games.
Dr. Zoidberg
Member
<Shrug> I'm afraid that is their only path to success. I can almost guarantee you that, barring some Wii-like mania, the vast majority of Switch purchasers are already going to have another primary gaming device (PS4/X1/PC) and/or primary handheld gaming device (iPhone/Android). The Switch will be a secondary platform purchased solely to access Nintendo's exclusive games and properties.
frankie_baby
Member
if its 200 pounds it'll be 200 dollars
frankie_baby
Member
local multi on the go with one system
Linkstrikesback
Member
It's unlikely the wii U ever price crashes to a significant degree again, there just aren't enough of the darn things. Fire sales of stock happened months ago and prices rose back up afterwards.
Will be interesting to see what the pack in game is. Zelda seems like a good game but I think they could easily sell it separately which makes me think it's better to go with something else.
At the same time I don't think a re-released Wii u game would be a good choice as that does not give Wii u owners and gamers anything new to show off the machine.
At the same time I don't think a re-released Wii u game would be a good choice as that does not give Wii u owners and gamers anything new to show off the machine.
frankie_baby
Member
if anything I could see the Wii U as an expensive collectors item
Would you mind if Nintendo made it much less powerful to hit the $200 price point. Such as Sub Wii U graphics portable and Wii U graphics when docked.
I feel alot of people here are being unreasonable and wanting a handheld device that's significantly more powerful than Wii U at the price of a 3DS XL.
Principate
Saint Titanfall
That's no different to the 3DS. I pretty sure most consumers who even bought a 3DS don't consider it their secondary mobile device despite likely owning a phone. The amount of people that are interested in such a device are shrinking but there's no way the switch works as a secondary mobile gaming device.
I firmly believe that price will be one of the major factors as to whether this will succeed or not, even if the games in the first year are great. One strike against the initial game library: you can't assume that loyal Wii U owners who already bought Smash/Mario Kart/Splatoon are going to hungrily line up to buy them again only 2-3 years later.
I really don't think anyone at this point can claim to know how many of us are buying it as a pure console or pure handheld as opposed to some of both. This is a new concept, after all. I also think that America will receive it differently than, say, Japan will. But we really have no idea, right?
The best we can do is compare apples to apples: Switch as a console to other consoles, and Switch as a handheld/tablet to other such devices. Obviously there will be more value for some users because it can be used as both, but for some (unknown) portion of the audience, this will not make as much of a difference. That is why I believe the price needs to be as low as possible: to encourage folks to buy it regardless of how they *think* they'll use it.
I would not suggest that it's DOA at higher prices (unless we go over $299), but really, this launch needs to be successful to convince gamers, developers, publishers AND investors that Nintendo is here to stay as a player in hardware. If they want to silence their "they should go 3rd party" critics, they need to move a ton of these things, and a lower price would really help.
That sounds like a ridiculous comparison. But for some people, it's really not. The fact is, many or even most folks nowadays don't need a computer. They go on Facebook and Tumblr and Instagram, they post and repost, they watch Netflix and YouTube, they laugh at cat videos, they occasionally write a post or a brief document or send an e-mail. Mobile versions of Office can even print. If a family is in that boat, why not compare a tablet with a computer?
And this is exactly why the lowest price point possible would be ideal.
peanutbutterlatte
Member
Not bad! £250 is about what I paid for a Wii U, and the cheaper option is even better.
Just no hideous white SKUs please. I feel like I would have played my Wii U more if it was black.
Just no hideous white SKUs please. I feel like I would have played my Wii U more if it was black.
frankie_baby
Member
considering 98% of Wii Us are black you kinda got yourself to blame for that
Jorok Goldblade
Member
But Europe also has VAT built into the price.
Really? The color of the box below the TV stopped you from playing the console?
ShadowFox08
Member
That doesn't mean they will still be priced $250 after holidays are over. Switch is out 3 months after holidays.
frankie_baby
Member
VAT is 20% in the uk, so without VAT £200 becomes £160 which at current exchange is pretty much spot on $200
Okami Haundo
Member
You did a fantastic job of further explaining things where I failed to do so, and I absolutely agree. In the scenarios you mentioned, people don't "need" a tablet and they would objectively get a more powerful and capable PC for the price.
I would argue that the people who want the PC over the tablet in that scenario would already choose Xbox One or PS4 over the Switch. Therefore, I don't think the two options being priced similarly means by default that one will always fail. Nintendo is seemingly aiming at the "form over function" crowd here and I don't think that means they need to come in way under in terms of pricing.
KojiKnight
Member
This. US process don't include tax and obviously don't have VAT. I'd expect about $200 for the us base model unless Nintendo wants to screw the US for a change.
Nah, I think people are being reasonable because...well, Nintendo hardware isn't worth that much. Market has told them that time and time again.
Price seems good
Games rumored in launch window looking promising
now waiting for exclusive AT&T 4G, expensive Memory Cards, and poor battery life to complete the Vita resurrection ritual.
Games rumored in launch window looking promising
now waiting for exclusive AT&T 4G, expensive Memory Cards, and poor battery life to complete the Vita resurrection ritual.
give me standard SD memory and i could care less about poor battery life and some stupid exclusivity feature i'll never use