• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Watch Dogs 2: Ubisoft Patches Out Female Genitalia, Leaves Male Genitalia

SJRB

Gold Member
Nudity is allowed under an M rating.

The back of the game case states nudity in one of its content descriptions for the rating.

It's only when you get into pornographic type of nudity that it would kick it into an AO rating.

tumblr_mta53fXrAR1qkyrq9o1_500.jpg

PEGI rating doesn't indicate nudity on the back of the box.

wxfDXIs.gif
kLmJp4a.gif
LTsNiPU.gif


And according to the ratings site, 18 is for explicit violence.
 
I've edited in the quote from Eurogamer. Fact remains, they are censoring a (the? how many are there?) female model, while leaving male genitalia unchanged.

it's completely beside the point as they're leaving female genitalia in there too. poor form from eurogamer.
 

Ferr986

Member
Guys, they only patched that model that wasn't supposed to show it. Don't worry, your virtual vaginas are still intact.

Seriously, the overreaction from some people for 1 digital pussy is kind of amazing.
 

danowat

Banned
Guys, they only patched that model that wasn't supposed to show it. Don't worry, you're virtual vaginas are still intact.

Seriously, the overreaction from some people for 1 digital pussy is kind of amazing.

Forget the vagina, it sets a poor president, especially in an 18 / M rated piece of media.
 
I've edited in the quote from Eurogamer. Fact remains, they are censoring a (the? how many are there?) female model, while leaving male genitalia unchanged.

There's a clothed NPC with her vag out as well as fully nude NPCs of both sexes. They're only getting rid of the former, it looks like.
 
I've edited in the quote from Eurogamer. Fact remains, they are censoring a (the? how many are there?) female model, while leaving male genitalia unchanged.

The female model being patched is walking around with a skirt and gaping hole on her underwear. They are leaving the male equivalent unchanged because there are none to begin with. There is no male NPC walking around with a gaping hole on his pants.

I saw a video of a full nude man pissing on a wall. So yeah.

Full nude women are still in the game.
 

Par Score

Member
I guess Sony grabbed them by the pussy.

It's a stupid knee jerk, retro-active decision from Ubi to censor this, just panders to the tabloid notion that games are evil.

No, it "panders" to one of their key partners who also happens to be a major platform holder.
 

Ferr986

Member
Forget the vagina, it sets a poor president, especially in an 18 / M rated piece of media.

why? they have female nude models. Thing is that model wasn't supposed to show that, so they patched it. This is not about censoring sexual content, it's about correcting something that wasn't supposed to show.

If it really was about not showing any nude females they would have patched them all.
 

Occam

Member
Because Sony banned a guy for tweeting a screenshot of vagina via live for Playstation.

Shits happened, Sony unbanned the guy and Ubisoft now has to cover the vagina up.

Wouldn't the correct reaction be to leave it in and for Sony to tell PSN users not to share images with full frontal nudity?
 
The girl hoola hooping butt naked is still in from what my friend has said. Guess they just closed up the other girls underwear window.
 

danowat

Banned
why? they have female nude models. Thing is that model wasn't supposed to show that, so they patched it. This is not about censoring sexual content, it's about correcting something that wasn't supposed to show.

If it really was about not showing any nude females they would have patched them all.

They would say that!
 

black070

Member
One model being changed, what's the issue here ? That they should change a penis model too for fairness ? Lol, there's always gotta be a controversy.
 
So full nude is fine, but 'special' underwear isn't.

Why? I'm seriously a tiny bit perplexed. But Sony stopped making sense to me when they decided to not include an UHD drive to the pro so whatever.
It's a tad more invasive. The logic would be that the woman doesn't want her genitals to be seen, the only way to do that is murder her and peep under her skirt. That's slightly different to nudist models.
 

SomTervo

Member
Fuck.

That.

Ubisoft were just rebuilding trust. Now this.

Edit: right, so it's just the prostitute model. Makes it slightly more understandable, she was a bit gritty/brutal in comparison with the rest of the game.
 

13ruce

Banned
Well the reaction to nudity nowadays is kinda childish, you can kill people in the most horriffic ways in video games but show a boob, dick or vagina and everyone gets crazy.

Just allow nudity in games and 18+ media imo and put it big on the FRONT of the box that there is violence or nudity, cursing etc on a game and film boxes for parents. Not all of them read the back cover.

I guess sex/nudity is still kinda embarrassing or something like that.
 
The Australian box art has a nudity warning on the ratings sticker.

This seems like a knee jerk reaction, so the tits and dicks are fine but the vagina is too far.

191861-L-LO.jpg
 

OmegaX0

Member
It's a tad more invasive. The logic would be that the woman doesn't want her genitals to be seen, the only way to do that is murder her and peep under her skirt. That's slightly different to nudist models.

Apart from the silliness of applying this logic to digital character models, I would imagine the women doesn't want to be murdered either but they're not patching that out.
 

Chris1

Member
Stupid. Not just because they're leaving dicks in (that's only making the situation worse), but cmon, it's an 18 this shit should be allowed within reason. People are way too up tight about what's in video games, it's not like it's a porn simulator or something.
 
Top Bottom